(06-20-2023, 05:00 AM)omahen Wrote: I don't think Boston would be willing to trade Brogdon and Williams for just Wood. I still think, if contender wants Wood, he can choose the MLE way (either full or taxpayer, depending what contender has). I don't think a contender would be willing to pay him more than a "prove it" deal. 

My guess for Williams would be, that Boston would look at some draft compensation to facilitate SnT or not excersize their restricted option. To be honest, I am not sure Williams is worth more than full MLE. Huge risk paying him more than that, imho. I just don't see a third best player on a contender type in him, which would justify paying him closer to 20 per.

(06-20-2023, 05:18 AM)omahen Wrote: I wouldn't be surprised to see Morris twins on Mavs, especially if he gets dealed to Washington for CP3. His contract is expiring, so not bad. No idea how Mavs could pull it off, since they don't have small draft assets. How about a package for a lightly protected 2027 FRP, basically similar to what Lakers did? That could even allow Mavs to keep #10 pick and still get solid rotation.

Was: salary fillers, lightly protected 2027
Mavs: Avdija, Morris, Gafford

https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1670890614332747776

(06-20-2023, 08:16 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: That seems awfully light for Washington, but I would love this.    I was looking for a higher tier player using a future first, but to get all three seems like too much.    Gafford is a guy if you catch on the right night is fabulous.   I wouldn't count him more than a good backup and one who is overpaid.   But he could find a role here.   Morris is a stop gap, but could also provide 20-25 minutes, I think.  He would not be the reason for the trade but a solid win now move.  Avdija is the prize to me.   He is a gamble as he not been very good in the NBA.   But he is big, young and can defend.   He would be a good gamble to take.   

All this and you still have pick #10.   Not bad.

(06-20-2023, 09:16 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: I think my biggest issue with the Capella trade options is that it makes us better, but not good enough.  Long term, it makes it so important to his pick #15.  In 1-2 years Capella is gone and what do we have left?

I am sure that is the same if we keep #10 where that pick could bust.    But i just feel like we are playing the middle ground in a trade like that (I like the idea of playing the middle in previous discussions) but I think this leaves us potentially not good enough for now, and lacking the young good developmental pieces moving forward.  Sort of no mans land. 

Why am I wrong?  Would like to hear others disagreements.

(06-20-2023, 09:43 AM)omahen Wrote: Well, if Bilal is available at 10 and the Spurs are willing to trade Keldon Johnson, I would like it

https://twitter.com/_TradeDeadline/status/1671162811031117826

(06-20-2023, 05:18 AM)omahen Wrote: I wouldn't be surprised to see Morris twins on Mavs, especially if he gets dealed to Washington for CP3. His contract is expiring, so not bad. No idea how Mavs could pull it off, since they don't have small draft assets. How about a package for a lightly protected 2027 FRP, basically similar to what Lakers did? That could even allow Mavs to keep #10 pick and still get solid rotation.

Was: salary fillers, lightly protected 2027
Mavs: Avdija, Morris, Gafford

https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1670890614332747776

(06-20-2023, 09:58 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: I honestly don’t know exactly how TE’s work, but I wonder if this gets us a $19M one?

Bertans/Bullock/McGee/10 to SA
Sochan/Collins/$19M TE/3 SRPs to Dal

Something like that? Would like to see us step into FA with that kind of buying power and some SRPs.

(06-20-2023, 09:43 AM)omahen Wrote: Well, if Bilal is available at 10 and the Spurs are willing to trade Keldon Johnson, I would like it

https://twitter.com/_TradeDeadline/status/1671162811031117826

(06-20-2023, 10:13 AM)Luka77 Wrote: If the Mavs are moving out the first and SAS are desperate to move in, I would make it hurt.

Johnson and Vessell (he plays the same position as Bilal and Ausar) for #10 and some draft assests.

In no way am I helping SAS build there team.

(06-20-2023, 10:05 AM)omahen Wrote: I can't provide exact explanation. If I understand correctly, TE is basically the difference between the outgoing and incoming (but not taking into account the 125 % factor). FGump will provide the exact explanation. 

As for the deal - all accounts are, that Sochan is untouchable. He was 9th pick last year and has great potential. In addition to that, SA would be taking a bunch ob bad money (cap space has value) and pay 3 SRP. I am affraid valuation is far off, no matter how much they might like Bilal.

The only player from their core (Wemby, Sochan, Vassel, Johnson) that could be available is Johnson.

What you could perhaps do from your proposal - remove Sochan and insert one of the less talented guys on rookie deals they have (Wesley, Branham, Bassey). They might be available in such a deal.

(06-20-2023, 10:28 AM)omahen Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1671177851276517376

(06-20-2023, 10:28 AM)omahen Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1671177851276517376