Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - ThisIStheYear - 05-29-2023 (05-28-2023, 01:10 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Maybe something more simple (leaving out Rui avoids BYC and hard cap for Phoenix). BTW, I don’t think we have to accommodate Kyrie’s max in a deal with LA. They can’t get there through cap room and $46.9mm is just a killer to their ability to fill the roster and stay under the apron. Trade matching is one issue in setting his number. But, paying who they want to keep and using their exception are also factors. This makes sense for Dallas without the pick. Ayton fills a need and will be very good in a better situation. Vandy is a massive upgrade on Reggie (bottom 5 among rotation players last year based on Raptor and Lebron). Plus, Dallas gets much younger. The problem is Phoenix. They get 3 poo poo players and wasted roster spots. No way they’d do this. But it’s a nice thought. Dallas would more than recoup what they gave up for Kyrie, which is the main goal. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DanSchwartzgan - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 07:06 AM)ThisIStheYear Wrote: This makes sense for Dallas without the pick. Ayton fills a need and will be very good in a better situation. Vandy is a massive upgrade on Reggie (bottom 5 among rotation players last year based on Raptor and Lebron). Plus, Dallas gets much younger. The problem is Phoenix. They get 3 poo poo players and wasted roster spots. No way they’d do this. But it’s a nice thought. Dallas would more than recoup what they gave up for Kyrie, which is the main goal. You should probably speak with BigDirk41. I agree that Dallas comes out well in this. Give me Ayton/Vandy over Dinwiddie/DFS all day (swapping unprotected 29's is a wash). The final quarter of Bill Simmon's podcast with Ryan Rusillo yesterday was an excellent listen on the new CBA. They thought this is exactly the kind of thing Phoenix HAS to do. It was pretty fascinating to hear them go team by team and see how challenging the new second apron is going to be. Their main point was that the middle class of the NBA is going to get screwed. Lots of good players are going to be available over the next 2-3 years. They didn't completely have some of the timing of this right. The phase in of certain aspects will give teams the choice of drastic measures now or in 24. Some might wait until 2025. But, things are going to change. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - StepBackJay - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 07:06 AM)ThisIStheYear Wrote: This makes sense for Dallas without the pick. Ayton fills a need and will be very good in a better situation. Vandy is a massive upgrade on Reggie (bottom 5 among rotation players last year based on Raptor and Lebron). Plus, Dallas gets much younger. The problem is Phoenix. They get 3 poo poo players and wasted roster spots. No way they’d do this. But it’s a nice thought. Dallas would more than recoup what they gave up for Kyrie, which is the main goal. I agree RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - DanSchwartzgan - 05-29-2023 Interesting idea from "Sir Charles in Charge" site. Plays off of SA's desire to move into the top 10 (presumably to draft a guard): #10/Bertans for Collins/Graham and Atlanta's 2025. SA has up to 7 first round picks between 23, 24 and 25. So, it doesn't have to be this pick. Collins is UFA a year from now. He's an interesting name we haven't talked about. Spreads the floor some. Switchable defender (fits scheme) who also blocks some shots. Not a great rebounder and extensive injury history. He has routinely been a net positive on-court even with bad teams. Graham could be the third guard behind Luka and Kyrie. He has two seasons left at about MLE money, but second season is only guaranteed for $2.8mm (so a very positive asset at the TDL). My question would be whether you'd rather have the depth with Graham, or no returning salary and a TE. It feels like the Collins/Bertans/picks parts of this would be good for both teams (except, you just can't count on Collins being an 82 game guy). Given the value of Graham as an expiring deal (essentially), I'd probably take him. The pick doesn't have to be the Atlanta pick. I'd be very interested in adding SA's #33 as part of this. Collins Powell McGee Luka Maxi Morris Green Reggie Lawson THJ Hardy Holiday Irving Graham #33 Note, this team didn't need to spend the MLE and is under the tax. It can trade a chunk of salary between Reggie and Graham at the TDL along with the Atlanta 2025 first and the Dallas 2027. BTW, if one wanted to still do a deal for Ayton, doing it at the same time as the rest of this makes the deal large enough that THJ/McGee is a trade match for Ayton without the need to include Green. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - StepBackJay - 05-29-2023 Hear me out guys.... https://twitter.com/StepBackJay77/status/1663188715840184320 RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - Chicagojk - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 09:21 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: Hear me out guys.... I just don't know if that Nets trade is enough. Adding DFS and O'neal would be intriguing. But adding Green to the trade is tough. Green is on the up and should be able to sign for a team friendly contract this year. Bullock was awful last year but I can see a world where he is a comparable player to DFS and O'neal next year, I think. So I think I would pass on this trade. But maybe I am in the minority. For the Utah trade, they mention two late round firsts in addition to 16. Utah has pick #28 this year but don't have any more picks. Is that a future pick? I would probably be against this trade as well. I just want to upgrade the talent. I like Olynyk, but not sure he moves the needle to where we want to go. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - DanSchwartzgan - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 09:21 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: Hear me out guys.... Nope. Josh Green is arguably the best player in this deal (certainly is over the next 3 seasons). Dallas refused to put him in the package for Kyrie. No way they include him in a deal for this bunch of mediocrity. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - Razzmatazz_Hopskidillydoo - 05-29-2023 I never had the notion that Josh Green took over games last season. To me, those games where he scored most isn't him taking control. He was, in my mind, still holding back. It's (still) part of who he is. He defers too much, even if he doesn't have to. I know JG has praised JKidd for his development, but IMHo, JG needs someone who'd tell him to "Go all-in". Someone who'd encourage him to take over. JKidd's offense is too Luka and Kyrie centric, I don't think that kind of offense unlocks what JG is truly capable of.. but still.. I'm quite sure, Josh Green is legit 2 way player. And a good one at that. He's going to ball if the coaches let him. So.. nope. JG is too valueble for a DFS+Oneal. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - BigDirk41 - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 09:21 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: Hear me out guys.... Appreciate the work, but no way if Josh Green is included. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - StepBackJay - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 09:32 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: I just don't know if that Nets trade is enough. Adding DFS and O'neal would be intriguing. But adding Green to the trade is tough. Green is on the up and should be able to sign for a team friendly contract this year. Bullock was awful last year but I can see a world where he is a comparable player to DFS and O'neal next year, I think. So I think I would pass on this trade. But maybe I am in the minority. They have pick 16 this year from Minnesota I believe. First the Nets part of the trade: they have a surplus of veteran wings that they don't really need for a rebuild. Green fits more what they need. Bullock would just be salary filler for them. The real prize is pick 16 and Green. For Mavs they get 2 starting-capable wings and more picks that they can use for depth or other trades. Back to the Utah trade, KO is just turning Bertans into a usable rotation player. KO would fit the Mavs well. The more important part of the trade is turning 10 into 16 and 28. After all this maneuvering you are left with a top 8 of: Luka, Kai, O'Neale, DFS, Maxi, KO, THJ, Hardy + 3 picks which likely are going to be used in part to get a starting center. I haven't added up the salaries but you are probably out of the full MLE bc of the salaries you would be adding, absent other moves. 21, 22, 28 could be used for Turner, Ayton, who knows either the night of the draft or after. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - StepBackJay - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 09:55 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Nope. Josh Green is arguably the best player in this deal (certainly is over the next 3 seasons). Dallas refused to put him in the package for Kyrie. No way they include him in a deal for this bunch of mediocrity. I guess my view of Green is lower than others. I am not sure he is worth more than a late first round pick. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - StepBackJay - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 10:55 AM)BigDirk41 Wrote: Appreciate the work, but no way if Josh Green is included. My issue with Green is he plays guard and Mavs have too many guards and not enough forwards. Mavs tried to play him at SF and he doesn't do as well there. He is a year away from a new contract and I would like to cash in on him before he gets paid too much money. He is a good player but Mavs tried him in a few different roles with limited success. He had a stretch of like 4 games where he was unstoppable but that was a limited sample size and then he came back down to earth. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - HoosierDaddyKid - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 11:02 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: I guess my view of Green is lower than others. I am not sure he is worth more than a late first round pick. I tend to agree. He needs to take a big jump in productivity to make me a believer. He has the tools especially defensively, but he plays too passively at times and defers way too often. This year we'll see if he's more than just hype. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - DanSchwartzgan - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 11:02 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: I guess my view of Green is lower than others. I am not sure he is worth more than a late first round pick. Oh yeah, we definitely don't agree on this. JG is exactly what everyone is looking for. +D, high percentage on 3's. Can destroy closeouts, runs the floor and a good mover of the ball. I literally wouldn't trade him for DFS AND a late first round pick. People have underappreciated him from the beginning because of who he wasn't. But what he has become is incredibly valuable. Unrelated to your idea (but related to Brooklyn), I've cooled considerably to the idea of dumping salary to them. They need to get under the tax this season (repeater) and signing Cam Johnson and taking on a salary into their TPE (like Bertans) isn't going to allow that to happen. That leaves SA as the only team that can facilitate a salary dump before 7/1 ($22.1mm according to Spotrac). If it turns out we really aren't meeting with guys who might go at #10 and are meeting with guys in the late first or early second, I'd keep an eye on SA. I really like some things about the SCIC trade idea I posted above. It requires us to think of improvement as a two step process with the second step being what we can get from trading picks and using expiring contracts like Graham and Reggie. BTW, you know who is a trade match for Graham + Reggie? Draymond. Front court is now Draymond, Collins and Maxi. Mix and match any combination. All of them are very switchable. D goes up dramatically. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - Ghost of Podkolzin - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 09:10 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Interesting idea from "Sir Charles in Charge" site. Plays off of SA's desire to move into the top 10 (presumably to draft a guard): IMO, Collins is an early retirement candidate. That finger that refuses to heal scares me. He had his worst season last year since his rookie year. As you mention he's not a good rebounder. (05-29-2023, 11:26 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Oh yeah, we definitely don't agree on this. JG is exactly what everyone is looking for. +D, high percentage on 3's. Can destroy closeouts, runs the floor and a good mover of the ball. I literally wouldn't trade him for DFS AND a late first round pick. People have underappreciated him from the beginning because of who he wasn't. But what he has become is incredibly valuable. Agreed. Green's productivity will increase. It's that effective (low output albeit) production that tells me that. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - omahen - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 11:42 AM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: IMO, Collins is an early retirement candidate. That finger that refuses to heal scares me. He had his worst season last year since his rookie year. As you mention he's not a good rebounder. Dan is speaking about San Antonio Collins, not Atlanta one. I am basically against all money saving trades. Neither Collins nor Graham are not nearly worth compared to what #10 could develop into. This kind of guys should be obtained for vet min or exception money, not using #10 pick, imho. If I am trading #10, it is for an established starter. Otherwise rather keep it. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - surfpuckmd - 05-29-2023 (05-28-2023, 01:10 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Maybe something more simple (leaving out Rui avoids BYC and hard cap for Phoenix). BTW, I don’t think we have to accommodate Kyrie’s max in a deal with LA. They can’t get there through cap room and $46.9mm is just a killer to their ability to fill the roster and stay under the apron. Trade matching is one issue in setting his number. But, paying who they want to keep and using their exception are also factors. I think Ayton would be a poor fit here. I also think he's a terrible contract. He doesn't defend well at the rim. He doesn't space the floor. He's a big who doesn't draw fouls (shoots 3 FT per game). He has serious effort issues. He couldn't get along with Monty Williams- a good coach who his players generally like. I can't imagine him suddenly getting along better with coach Kidd who is both malignant and incompetent. Ayton has the ability to be a top 30 player but is nowhere near that level currently. I believe he's currently a really bad contract who was paid based on potential improvement. I don't think he showed any improvement this most recent season. Not only he Kyrie Irving a vastly superior player to Ayton but Porzingis is much better as well. I think we'd be better off letting Kyrie Irving walk off to the Lakers than taking Deandre Ayton's contract on. There are not many competitive teams with significant cap space this summer. I believe we could sign a couple quality role players via free agency should Kyrie Irving go elsewhere. I think our best option though is clearly keeping Kyrie Irving on the Mavericks. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - DanSchwartzgan - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 11:45 AM)omahen Wrote: Dan is speaking about San Antonio Collins, not Atlanta one. Don't forget the unprotected 2025 from Atlanta. I like Collins as a big in the rotation, but he has to be supplemented given his injury history. Graham does nothing for me, but his contract structure and that pick are a means to an end. If that Atlanta pick, Reggie and Graham landed you Draymond and Collins in your starting lineup, that isn't a money saving move in the least. It is reworking your frontcourt and the cost was basically #10 and Reggie. One note, if this is done in June as one big trade, Dallas has to add another body (McGee) as Bertans/Reggie misses by $54k. Dallas salary is relatively low here, so this could be a S&T of Draymond in July also. Personally, I think better to knock it all out in June. If it is a S&T, you have about $70mm to work with for KI and DG before you hit the first apron. Collins Powell Green Maxi Green THJ Luka Hardy KI TP MLE RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - ItsGoTime - 05-29-2023 (05-29-2023, 11:45 AM)omahen Wrote: Dan is speaking about San Antonio Collins, not Atlanta one.Yes, #10 HAS to be a hit no matter what we do with it. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein: Mavs have "no interest" in DLo - Jakeospikez - 05-29-2023 Not really interested in dealing with the Spurs for #10. They have a bunch of junk from a tanking team they're trying to offload in hopes of getting Cason Wallace. Do you really want to help a division rival with giving them a point of attack defender to hound Luka for the next decade to go along with Victor protecting the rim? Sounds absolutely horrible to help these guys out for some of their trash. I'm not really that interested in Keldon Johnson even let alone Zach Collins. Graham is negative value. Picks in the 10-20 range this year are way more important to the Mavs right now than future picks. I'm sure there's better deals out there. |