MavsBoard
Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - omahen - 05-26-2023

Which one would you prefer?

THJ+Bertans+10 for Ayton or
Maxi+McGee+10 for Turner

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10077300-trade-packages-to-jump-5-teams-into-the-2023-nba-draft-lottery


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DallasMaverick - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 01:42 PM)omahen Wrote: Which one would you prefer?

THJ+Bertans+10 for Ayton or
Maxi+McGee+10 for Turner

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10077300-trade-packages-to-jump-5-teams-into-the-2023-nba-draft-lottery

Dang.

Turner, but I don't want to give up Kleber.  How about Bertans & McGee +10 for Turner?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - Mapka - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 05:41 AM)F Gump Wrote: Are  you saying the window of opportunity for the Mavs to develop their own bargain talent has been closed? I wouldn't think so. In fact, I think it's more important than ever.

Whether Cuban will make it a priority and demand it be done at the highest level does remain to be seen. But I think the team's current roster and payroll screams for them to figure out how to become really superior at the find-and-develop game.

I don't think they should stop searching and developing talent.

But they can't stop doing win-now stuff to bet on something, that may be there in three years or not.

Win-now > betting to be lucky later.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - SleepingHero - 05-26-2023

Quote:Kyrie Irving certainly has the right to leave in free agency.

But the Mavericks don’t plan to assist any other team in acquiring him in a sign-and-trade, @tim_cato writes.
[url=https://twitter.com/theathleticnba/status/1662141797617877002?s=46&t=Fmdr94oXagcEyy75KJqaFg][/url]

Seems like the Mavs are set on Kyrie.....or this is posturing. In either case, I'm penciling a Kyrie return.

Which means we better find a good defensive center. Does CLE really want to give away Jarrett Allen?

More from the article
Quote:Kleber signed an extension prior to last season that will pay him $11 million each of the next three seasons. He’s as available as anyone else on the roster not named Dončić.

But Kleber probably won’t be traded this summer, not after the disappointing season he had sandwiched around midseason surgery. Other teams might like Kleber as a player, but his league-wide valuation has been understandably reduced by those injury- and age-related factors. Basically, Kleber would be much more valuable to the Mavericks if he does return to playing like his best self next season than if he was traded. He’s also a player who has benefited from playing with Dončić, something the league increasingly realizes about Dallas’ role players after seeing Dorian Finney-Smith’s production decline in Brooklyn.



RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - dirkfansince1998 - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 02:27 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: [url=https://twitter.com/theathleticnba/status/1662141797617877002?s=46&t=Fmdr94oXagcEyy75KJqaFg][/url]

Seems like the Mavs are set on Kyrie.....or this is posturing. In either case, I'm penciling a Kyrie return.

Which means we better find a good defensive center. Does CLE really want to give away Jarrett Allen?

More from the article

Based on the Brunson failure one could also come to the conclusion that they aren´t prepared for whatever Kyrie can come up with in the next few weeks.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - omahen - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 02:27 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: [url=https://twitter.com/theathleticnba/status/1662141797617877002?s=46&t=Fmdr94oXagcEyy75KJqaFg][/url]

Seems like the Mavs are set on Kyrie.....or this is posturing. In either case, I'm penciling a Kyrie return.

Which means we better find a good defensive center. Does CLE really want to give away Jarrett Allen?

More from the article

Cato statement was taken hugely out of context. It was just his opinion, not insider info he was reporting. Here is the full quote:

It requires tact, but the Mavericks should simply tell Irving upfront what contract they would like for him to re-sign, and while he certainly has the right to leave, they don’t plan to assist any other team in acquiring him. They have the most appealing offer.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - Chicagojk - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 02:45 PM)omahen Wrote: Cato statement was taken hugely out of context. It was just his opinion, not insider info he was reporting. Here is the full quote:

It requires tact, but the Mavericks should simply tell Irving upfront what contract they would like for him to re-sign, and while he certainly has the right to leave, they don’t plan to assist any other team in acquiring him. They have the most appealing offer.

Wouldn't you hope that conversation has already happened already?  No more of this BS that they never got a chance to make an offer to Jalen again.

In an ideal world, they have laid out the range the want to resign Kyrie at and have communicated that to him.   I would get his thoughts and then tell him to give us up to the draft and we will come back with a plan and present to him how we are surrounding him and Luka.   And his total $ could vary a few million depending what we come back with.    

With that being said, they probably haven't discussed a salary range internally and Mark is all hands on working on a Kyrie animated video on a flat earth.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - SleepingHero - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 02:45 PM)omahen Wrote: Cato statement was taken hugely out of context. It was just his opinion, not insider info he was reporting. Here is the full quote:

It requires tact, but the Mavericks should simply tell Irving upfront what contract they would like for him to re-sign, and while he certainly has the right to leave, they don’t plan to assist any other team in acquiring him. They have the most appealing offer.

Thanks for the clarification. That definitely changes the context of the entire statement. Still, can't help but agree with Cato's thinking, as it's the simplest for all parties. Tell Kyrie your number (and make sure it's significant enough no other team can come reasonably close), and tell him you aren't helping any other teams to sign your rights unless it's for an all-star. 


Problem is, I think Cubes will forget he needs to make an offer that is more than what other teams can offer, based on history.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - ItsGoTime - 05-26-2023

Missing in that evaluation of DFS is he slipped this year on our team too. Hardly evidence of anything.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DanSchwartzgan - 05-26-2023

I spent a little time yesterday trying to consume news/rumors from the perspective of other markets.  I’m starting to piece together how some of the more prevalent things we’ve heard are seen elsewhere and see if it has any impact on what I’ve considered my core position:

Ayton:  I’m starting to think the Ayton thing is pretty likely.  I also think the Eric Pincus proposal is going to be close.  In some of the writing and podcasts I consumed, folks in Phoenix think there will be a market for Ayton.  One source thought his market was a starter, a young player and a pick.  From a salary matching standpoint, it pretty much has to be THJ/McGee and Green in a two team deal.  Pincus also added #10.  We are seeing some negotiations already in the media, so this isn’t done.  It doesn’t have to be number 10 and the salary matching changes if the deal expands to involve a Dallas salary dump to a third team that wants #10.  One thing to bear in mind, whatever we send, there has to be a path for Phoenix to use it to get a center.

#10:  We’ve heard lots of speculation about moving down, possibly as a means of moving some salary.  When you plan out the salary of what it would take to add two starters, dead money is just a killer.  A S/W of Bertans makes sense if Kyrie is staying as you have $180mm to work with.  But, if he leaves and you want to S&T someone in, the budget drops by $10mm and $4.4mm for Bertans is a ton.  Similarly, the $5mm price tag for #10 is higher than the value you are going to get from him for the next season or two.  So, I can easily see Dallas using the pick to move down for multiple picks.  One might go to Phoenix in the Ayton deal and one might go to pay for a team eating salary for us.  

We talk a lot about Utah with 16 and 28 or Brooklyn with 21 and 22 as logical trade down positions.  Indy with 26, 29 and 32 is alow logical.  But, the ability to eat salary is just as important as having multiple picks.  The only places that can eat sizable salary at the draft with no returning salary are SA (cap space) and Brooklyn (TPE).  Note Brooklyn is on both lists and has a center (Claxton is a CAA client as are Booker and CP).  BTW, if Claxton is in such a deal for #10, I might propose Green stays with Dallas and Brooklyn takes Reggie and McGee creating a $15.4mm TPE for Dallas.

Kyrie: I think he’s going to LA.  I think it is a double S&T and Dallas will get D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  If you think about it, D-Lo is Dinwiddie, Rui is DFS and 29 pick for 29 pick.  So, we got got a look at Luka with a second star who creates and we got younger at the positions we sent out.  Mentally, I’ve tried to put Vanderbilt in this slot for salary and defensive purposes.  But, if you put Ayton on the team, the PF can’t be Vanderbilt.  The PF has to be someone who can shoot from outside.  Rui actually has better net numbers as a SF, so closing lineups with Ayton, Maxi and Rui can work.  Is it ideal?  No, but neither was Dinwiddie and DFS.  Kyrie fits the Lebron timetable better and D-Lo and Rui fit the Luka timetable better (and you get two players for the price of Kyrie).

So, putting it all together, at the draft the following happens: 

Brooklyn gets 10/Reggie/McGee for Claxton/22
Phoenix gets THJ/Claxton for Ayton
Dallas gets Ayton/22 (for THJ, Reggie, McGee and #10).

Note, it doesn’t look like a trade down for a dump.  It is a trade down for talent.

You can stay put at this point if Kyrie stays, but I said I think Kyrie is leaving for D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  When you do that, you have:

Ayton.         Powell
Rui.             Maxi
Trade/Sign.  Green
Luka.           Hardy
D-Lo

You also have #22 and minimums to finish things out.  You also have a Wood S&T possibility or a TPE trade possibility and you now have 2027 and LA’s 2029 (and #22) to put in a trade.  Which MLE you get will be dependent on that trade and what you paid Rui Powell and D-Lo.  You have to pay attention to where you are regarding the first apron as you can’t go over with the S&T’s from LA..


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DanSchwartzgan - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 01:42 PM)omahen Wrote: Which one would you prefer?

THJ+Bertans+10 for Ayton or
Maxi+McGee+10 for Turner

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10077300-trade-packages-to-jump-5-teams-into-the-2023-nba-draft-lottery

Bleacher also had Reggie/Maxi/#10 for Allen and Okoru.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - ItsGoTime - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 04:09 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Bleacher also had Reggie/Maxi/#10 for Allen and Okoru.
I like this soooooo much better!


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DallasMaverick - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 04:05 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I spent a little time yesterday trying to consume news/rumors from the perspective of other markets.  I’m starting to piece together how some of the more prevalent things we’ve heard are seen elsewhere and see if it has any impact on what I’ve considered my core position:

Ayton:  I’m starting to think the Ayton thing is pretty likely.  I also think the Eric Pincus proposal is going to be close.  In some of the writing and podcasts I consumed, folks in Phoenix think there will be a market for Ayton.  One source thought his market was a starter, a young player and a pick.  From a salary matching standpoint, it pretty much has to be THJ/McGee and Green in a two team deal.  Pincus also added #10.  We are seeing some negotiations already in the media, so this isn’t done.  It doesn’t have to be number 10 and the salary matching changes if the deal expands to involve a Dallas salary dump to a third team that wants #10.  One thing to bear in mind, whatever we send, there has to be a path for Phoenix to use it to get a center.

#10:  We’ve heard lots of speculation about moving down, possibly as a means of moving some salary.  When you plan out the salary of what it would take to add two starters, dead money is just a killer.  A S/W of Bertans makes sense if Kyrie is staying as you have $180mm to work with.  But, if he leaves and you want to S&T someone in, the budget drops by $10mm and $4.4mm for Bertans is a ton.  Similarly, the $5mm price tag for #10 is higher than the value you are going to get from him for the next season or two.  So, I can easily see Dallas using the pick to move down for multiple picks.  One might go to Phoenix in the Ayton deal and one might go to pay for a team eating salary for us.  

We talk a lot about Utah with 16 and 28 or Brooklyn with 21 and 22 as logical trade down positions.  Indy with 26, 29 and 32 is alow logical.  But, the ability to eat salary is just as important as having multiple picks.  The only places that can eat sizable salary at the draft with no returning salary are SA (cap space) and Brooklyn (TPE).  Note Brooklyn is on both lists and has a center (Claxton is a CAA client as are Booker and CP).  BTW, if Claxton is in such a deal for #10, I might propose Green stays with Dallas and Brooklyn takes Reggie and McGee creating a $15.4mm TPE for Dallas.

Kyrie: I think he’s going to LA.  I think it is a double S&T and Dallas will get D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  If you think about it, D-Lo is Dinwiddie, Rui is DFS and 29 pick for 29 pick.  So, we got got a look at Luka with a second star who creates and we got younger at the positions we sent out.  Mentally, I’ve tried to put Vanderbilt in this slot for salary and defensive purposes.  But, if you put Ayton on the team, the PF can’t be Vanderbilt.  The PF has to be someone who can shoot from outside.  Rui actually has better net numbers as a SF, so closing lineups with Ayton, Maxi and Rui can work.  Is it ideal?  No, but neither was Dinwiddie and DFS.  Kyrie fits the Lebron timetable better and D-Lo and Rui fit the Luka timetable better (and you get two players for the price of Kyrie).

So, putting it all together, at the draft the following happens: 

Brooklyn gets 10/Reggie/McGee for Claxton/22
Phoenix gets THJ/Claxton for Ayton
Dallas gets Ayton/22 (for THJ, Reggie, McGee and #10).

Note, it doesn’t look like a trade down for a dump.  It is a trade down for talent.

You can stay put at this point if Kyrie stays, but I said I think Kyrie is leaving for D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  When you do that, you have:

Ayton.         Powell
Rui.             Maxi
Trade/Sign.  Green
Luka.           Hardy
D-Lo

You also have #22 and minimums to finish things out.  You also have a Wood S&T possibility or a TPE trade possibility and you now have 2027 and LA’s 2029 (and #22) to put in a trade.  Which MLE you get will be dependent on that trade and what you paid Rui Powell and D-Lo.  You have to pay attention to where you are regarding the first apron as you can’t go over with the S&T’s from LA..

Wow!

Them's some hot takes, Dr. Dan.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - omahen - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 04:05 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Kyrie: I think he’s going to LA.  I think it is a double S&T and Dallas will get D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  If you think about it, D-Lo is Dinwiddie, Rui is DFS and 29 pick for 29 pick.  So, we got got a look at Luka with a second star who creates and we got younger at the positions we sent out.  Mentally, I’ve tried to put Vanderbilt in this slot for salary and defensive purposes.  But, if you put Ayton on the team, the PF can’t be Vanderbilt.  The PF has to be someone who can shoot from outside.  Rui actually has better net numbers as a SF, so closing lineups with Ayton, Maxi and Rui can work.  Is it ideal?  No, but neither was Dinwiddie and DFS.  Kyrie fits the Lebron timetable better and D-Lo and Rui fit the Luka timetable better (and you get two players for the price of Kyrie).

I was thinking about a scenario if Kyrie wants to leave. I think the smarter move would be to go with minimum salary back instead of Russel. He is just not a good player and I don't want to have his contract on the books for years. I am also affraid Hachimura will be overpaid. So, I would take just 2029 and Vandy (might be a pipedream to get both) and Lakers send Russel and whatever salary they need to to a third team. Mavs create a huge TE that works like cap space. But please remind me, when do the new rules come into play? 2023/24 or season after? Can we sign FA into TE this season already?

In any case, they have a huge TE, which might be valuable. Teams will be looking to dump salary due to the new CBA. Teams that might decide to start over might be happy to not receive bad salary back. TE opens many possibilities. Russell is just a bad contract, imho. 

I am not against Ayton. Still young enough and Luka would pump his numbers. But leave room for elite wings, not for the likes of Russell. Green could be number one. Vandy could be number two. Use TE and picks for the number three. OG could be ideal. You can sell to him he will be number two on offense. You have two picks to send to Toronto and they can either have some of our "trash" contracts or no salary back. Grant could be another option, if Portland and Lillard decide to part ways. Can we interest San Antonio for Keldon Johnson with two picks? 

Luka
Green
OG/Grant/Johnson
Vandy
Ayton

This looks like a very nice core to build on. Young, athletic, switchable. You don't like Vandy, insert Maxi or Bullock in the starting line-up and have him as a first reserve at SF and PF spots.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - omahen - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 04:05 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Brooklyn gets 10/Reggie/McGee for Claxton/22
Phoenix gets THJ/Claxton for Ayton
Dallas gets Ayton/22 (for THJ, Reggie, McGee and #10).

I would just keep it simple and take Claxton. Leave Phoenix out.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - SleepingHero - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 04:05 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I spent a little time yesterday trying to consume news/rumors from the perspective of other markets.  I’m starting to piece together how some of the more prevalent things we’ve heard are seen elsewhere and see if it has any impact on what I’ve considered my core position:
Ayton:  I’m starting to think the Ayton thing is pretty likely.  I also think the Eric Pincus proposal is going to be close.  In some of the writing and podcasts I consumed, folks in Phoenix think there will be a market for Ayton.  One source thought his market was a starter, a young player and a pick.  From a salary matching standpoint, it pretty much has to be THJ/McGee and Green in a two team deal.  Pincus also added #10.  We are seeing some negotiations already in the media, so this isn’t done.  It doesn’t have to be number 10 and the salary matching changes if the deal expands to involve a Dallas salary dump to a third team that wants #10.  One thing to bear in mind, whatever we send, there has to be a path for Phoenix to use it to get a center.
#10:  We’ve heard lots of speculation about moving down, possibly as a means of moving some salary.  When you plan out the salary of what it would take to add two starters, dead money is just a killer.  A S/W of Bertans makes sense if Kyrie is staying as you have $180mm to work with.  But, if he leaves and you want to S&T someone in, the budget drops by $10mm and $4.4mm for Bertans is a ton.  Similarly, the $5mm price tag for #10 is higher than the value you are going to get from him for the next season or two.  So, I can easily see Dallas using the pick to move down for multiple picks.  One might go to Phoenix in the Ayton deal and one might go to pay for a team eating salary for us.  
We talk a lot about Utah with 16 and 28 or Brooklyn with 21 and 22 as logical trade down positions.  Indy with 26, 29 and 32 is alow logical.  But, the ability to eat salary is just as important as having multiple picks.  The only places that can eat sizable salary at the draft with no returning salary are SA (cap space) and Brooklyn (TPE).  Note Brooklyn is on both lists and has a center (Claxton is a CAA client as are Booker and CP).  BTW, if Claxton is in such a deal for #10, I might propose Green stays with Dallas and Brooklyn takes Reggie and McGee creating a $15.4mm TPE for Dallas.
Kyrie: I think he’s going to LA.  I think it is a double S&T and Dallas will get D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  If you think about it, D-Lo is Dinwiddie, Rui is DFS and 29 pick for 29 pick.  So, we got got a look at Luka with a second star who creates and we got younger at the positions we sent out.  Mentally, I’ve tried to put Vanderbilt in this slot for salary and defensive purposes.  But, if you put Ayton on the team, the PF can’t be Vanderbilt.  The PF has to be someone who can shoot from outside.  Rui actually has better net numbers as a SF, so closing lineups with Ayton, Maxi and Rui can work.  Is it ideal?  No, but neither was Dinwiddie and DFS.  Kyrie fits the Lebron timetable better and D-Lo and Rui fit the Luka timetable better (and you get two players for the price of Kyrie).
So, putting it all together, at the draft the following happens: 
Brooklyn gets 10/Reggie/McGee for Claxton/22
Phoenix gets THJ/Claxton for Ayton
Dallas gets Ayton/22 (for THJ, Reggie, McGee and #10).
Note, it doesn’t look like a trade down for a dump.  It is a trade down for talent.
You can stay put at this point if Kyrie stays, but I said I think Kyrie is leaving for D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  When you do that, you have:
Ayton.         Powell
Rui.             Maxi
Trade/Sign.  Green
Luka.           Hardy
D-Lo
You also have #22 and minimums to finish things out.  You also have a Wood S&T possibility or a TPE trade possibility and you now have 2027 and LA’s 2029 (and #22) to put in a trade.  Which MLE you get will be dependent on that trade and what you paid Rui Powell and D-Lo.  You have to pay attention to where you are regarding the first apron as you can’t go over with the S&T’s from LA..

I love the weekly inner thoughts omnibus of Dan.

I'm very curious why you're confident Kyrie is leaving at this point? Don't get me wrong, there is a lot of smoke pointing to Kyrie to LA (especially given the report that the Mavs might not offer the max). But what in this week tipped you over the edge?

Further, I don't think D-Lo is Dinwiddie. He's okay, but his hot-cold tendencies coupled with the "I'm an all-star" attitude scares the crap out of me. He flashed some incredible defensive potential in Minnesota 2 years ago, but that's all but vanished. I wouldn't be comfortable at all signing D-Lo for anything more than what THJ got, and even that that's an overpay. Problem is he wants 100mm+. He would have to agree to come to Dallas, at which point why are we accepting a bad salary deal?

Rui is way more interesting, but my excitement wanes if he's going to come on a deal bigger than 4/55. He's an okay player, but again he's flawed. 

You also have to demand Vanderbilt in such a trade. His archetype of defense and hustle does fit around the most important player on the roster, regardless of whether or not he fits next to a center we're trying to wrangle. 

Rui+D-Lo+Vanderbilt+29+#17 makes sense for the Mavs on paper. But I have a feeling seeing Kyrie jump ship in less than 4 months here can't bode well to keeping Luka happy. Who knows?

Re: Ayton , you know how much I love the big man, but I fail to see any other realistic suitor offering a package that nets the Suns all those things described above. Ayton's salary should be a massive negative. The Mavs had to pay to get off of a similar salary in Porzingis, I don't see why the Suns wouldn't have to do the same. Thus, I have to draw the line at Green OR #10. Suns can choose. 

A revised deal to that Pincus one could be one you alluded to in your #10n breakdown; THJ+Bertans+#10, but 10+Bertans is routed to IND, Turner goes to the Suns, Mavs get Ayton and IND last 2 picks in the first round. Now the Mavs have 3 firsts to fill out the roster should the Kyrie thing happen (as the Lakers pick as a formality). 

IND now has 7+10, and a massive salary relief. Mavs get Ayton and 2 shots to fill out the rotation. The deal feels a little light in terms for IND, so the Mavs might have to eat the last year of Hields contract (does the Buddy Love train return???)

Following with the rest of your offseason plans, New Look Mavs in my mind are:
Luka/Green/Hardy
D-Lo/Hield
Rui/Reggie
Vando/Maxi
Ayton/Powell

To me that is a much more balanced team head to toe.


Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 04:05 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I spent a little time yesterday trying to consume news/rumors from the perspective of other markets.  I’m starting to piece together how some of the more prevalent things we’ve heard are seen elsewhere and see if it has any impact on what I’ve considered my core position:

Ayton:  I’m starting to think the Ayton thing is pretty likely.  I also think the Eric Pincus proposal is going to be close.  In some of the writing and podcasts I consumed, folks in Phoenix think there will be a market for Ayton.  One source thought his market was a starter, a young player and a pick.  From a salary matching standpoint, it pretty much has to be THJ/McGee and Green in a two team deal.  Pincus also added #10.  We are seeing some negotiations already in the media, so this isn’t done.  It doesn’t have to be number 10 and the salary matching changes if the deal expands to involve a Dallas salary dump to a third team that wants #10.  One thing to bear in mind, whatever we send, there has to be a path for Phoenix to use it to get a center.

#10:  We’ve heard lots of speculation about moving down, possibly as a means of moving some salary.  When you plan out the salary of what it would take to add two starters, dead money is just a killer.  A S/W of Bertans makes sense if Kyrie is staying as you have $180mm to work with.  But, if he leaves and you want to S&T someone in, the budget drops by $10mm and $4.4mm for Bertans is a ton.  Similarly, the $5mm price tag for #10 is higher than the value you are going to get from him for the next season or two.  So, I can easily see Dallas using the pick to move down for multiple picks.  One might go to Phoenix in the Ayton deal and one might go to pay for a team eating salary for us.  

We talk a lot about Utah with 16 and 28 or Brooklyn with 21 and 22 as logical trade down positions.  Indy with 26, 29 and 32 is alow logical.  But, the ability to eat salary is just as important as having multiple picks.  The only places that can eat sizable salary at the draft with no returning salary are SA (cap space) and Brooklyn (TPE).  Note Brooklyn is on both lists and has a center (Claxton is a CAA client as are Booker and CP).  BTW, if Claxton is in such a deal for #10, I might propose Green stays with Dallas and Brooklyn takes Reggie and McGee creating a $15.4mm TPE for Dallas.

Kyrie: I think he’s going to LA.  I think it is a double S&T and Dallas will get D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  If you think about it, D-Lo is Dinwiddie, Rui is DFS and 29 pick for 29 pick.  So, we got got a look at Luka with a second star who creates and we got younger at the positions we sent out.  Mentally, I’ve tried to put Vanderbilt in this slot for salary and defensive purposes.  But, if you put Ayton on the team, the PF can’t be Vanderbilt.  The PF has to be someone who can shoot from outside.  Rui actually has better net numbers as a SF, so closing lineups with Ayton, Maxi and Rui can work.  Is it ideal?  No, but neither was Dinwiddie and DFS.  Kyrie fits the Lebron timetable better and D-Lo and Rui fit the Luka timetable better (and you get two players for the price of Kyrie).

So, putting it all together, at the draft the following happens: 

Brooklyn gets 10/Reggie/McGee for Claxton/22
Phoenix gets THJ/Claxton for Ayton
Dallas gets Ayton/22 (for THJ, Reggie, McGee and #10).

Note, it doesn’t look like a trade down for a dump.  It is a trade down for talent.

You can stay put at this point if Kyrie stays, but I said I think Kyrie is leaving for D-Lo and Rui and 2029.  When you do that, you have:

Ayton.         Powell
Rui.             Maxi
Trade/Sign.  Green
Luka.           Hardy
D-Lo

You also have #22 and minimums to finish things out.  You also have a Wood S&T possibility or a TPE trade possibility and you now have 2027 and LA’s 2029 (and #22) to put in a trade.  Which MLE you get will be dependent on that trade and what you paid Rui Powell and D-Lo.  You have to pay attention to where you are regarding the first apron as you can’t go over with the S&T’s from LA..
That sounds like a crazy post of mine

I like it. I’ve been anti-Ayton and pro-Kyrie but if those are the prices of those deals i would be happy with those moves. 

Kyrie i still believe is the best shot we have at pairing Luka with a real star. But if he wants out we have to max out the asset value. 

Pick 10, while i really like Walker and Hendricks, the best value is the trade down. It’s a deep draft and we need multiple players. Ideally we don’t trade totally out of the draft and we still have a pick while keeping Green and Hardy and upgrading our roster by moving THJ/Bert/Mcgee/Bullock


Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 05:54 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: I love the weekly inner thoughts omnibus of Dan.

I'm very curious why you're confident Kyrie is leaving at this point? Don't get me wrong, there is a lot of smoke pointing to Kyrie to LA (especially given the report that the Mavs might not offer the max). But what in this week tipped you over the edge?

Further, I don't think D-Lo is Dinwiddie. He's okay, but his hot-cold tendencies coupled with the "I'm an all-star" attitude scares the crap out of me. He flashed some incredible defensive potential in Minnesota 2 years ago, but that's all but vanished. I wouldn't be comfortable at all signing D-Lo for anything more than what THJ got, and even that that's an overpay. Problem is he wants 100mm+. He would have to agree to come to Dallas, at which point why are we accepting a bad salary deal?

Rui is way more interesting, but my excitement wanes if he's going to come on a deal bigger than 4/55. He's an okay player, but again he's flawed. 

You also have to demand Vanderbilt in such a trade. His archetype of defense and hustle does fit around the most important player on the roster, regardless of whether or not he fits next to a center we're trying to wrangle. 

Rui+D-Lo+Vanderbilt+29+#17 makes sense for the Mavs on paper. But I have a feeling seeing Kyrie jump ship in less than 4 months here can't bode well to keeping Luka happy. Who knows?

Re: Ayton , you know how much I love the big man, but I fail to see any other realistic suitor offering a package that nets the Suns all those things described above. Ayton's salary should be a massive negative. The Mavs had to pay to get off of a similar salary in Porzingis, I don't see why the Suns wouldn't have to do the same. Thus, I have to draw the line at Green OR #10. Suns can choose. 

A revised deal to that Pincus one could be one you alluded to in your #10n breakdown; THJ+Bertans+#10, but 10+Bertans is routed to IND, Turner goes to the Suns, Mavs get Ayton and IND last 2 picks in the first round. Now the Mavs have 3 firsts to fill out the roster should the Kyrie thing happen (as the Lakers pick as a formality). 

IND now has 7+10, and a massive salary relief. Mavs get Ayton and 2 shots to fill out the rotation. The deal feels a little light in terms for IND, so the Mavs might have to eat the last year of Hields contract (does the Buddy Love train return???)

Following with the rest of your offseason plans, New Look Mavs in my mind are:
Luka/Green/Hardy
D-Lo/Hield
Rui/Reggie
Vando/Maxi
Ayton/Powell

To me that is a much more balanced team head to toe.
I like how this type of move fits into plans of with or without Kyrie. 

Luka/Hardy
Kyrie/Hield
Green/Reggie
Mcdaniels-MLE/Maxi
Ayton/Powell 

Still the better lineup with Kyrie IMO


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DallasMaverick - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 05:54 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: I love the weekly inner thoughts omnibus of Dan.

I'm very curious why you're confident Kyrie is leaving at this point? Don't get me wrong, there is a lot of smoke pointing to Kyrie to LA (especially given the report that the Mavs might not offer the max). But what in this week tipped you over the edge?

Further, I don't think D-Lo is Dinwiddie. He's okay, but his hot-cold tendencies coupled with the "I'm an all-star" attitude scares the crap out of me. He flashed some incredible defensive potential in Minnesota 2 years ago, but that's all but vanished. I wouldn't be comfortable at all signing D-Lo for anything more than what THJ got, and even that that's an overpay. Problem is he wants 100mm+. He would have to agree to come to Dallas, at which point why are we accepting a bad salary deal?

Rui is way more interesting, but my excitement wanes if he's going to come on a deal bigger than 4/55. He's an okay player, but again he's flawed. 

You also have to demand Vanderbilt in such a trade. His archetype of defense and hustle does fit around the most important player on the roster, regardless of whether or not he fits next to a center we're trying to wrangle. 

Rui+D-Lo+Vanderbilt+29+#17 makes sense for the Mavs on paper. But I have a feeling seeing Kyrie jump ship in less than 4 months here can't bode well to keeping Luka happy. Who knows?

Re: Ayton , you know how much I love the big man, but I fail to see any other realistic suitor offering a package that nets the Suns all those things described above. Ayton's salary should be a massive negative. The Mavs had to pay to get off of a similar salary in Porzingis, I don't see why the Suns wouldn't have to do the same. Thus, I have to draw the line at Green OR #10. Suns can choose. 

A revised deal to that Pincus one could be one you alluded to in your #10n breakdown; THJ+Bertans+#10, but 10+Bertans is routed to IND, Turner goes to the Suns, Mavs get Ayton and IND last 2 picks in the first round. Now the Mavs have 3 firsts to fill out the roster should the Kyrie thing happen (as the Lakers pick as a formality). 

IND now has 7+10, and a massive salary relief. Mavs get Ayton and 2 shots to fill out the rotation. The deal feels a little light in terms for IND, so the Mavs might have to eat the last year of Hields contract (does the Buddy Love train return???)

Following with the rest of your offseason plans, New Look Mavs in my mind are:
Luka/Green/Hardy
D-Lo/Hield
Rui/Reggie
Vando/Maxi
Ayton/Powell

To me that is a much more balanced team head to toe.

https://deadspin.com/nba-los-angeles-lakers-dangelo-russell-point-guard-1850474961


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lebron: "I got a lot to think about next year" - DanSchwartzgan - 05-26-2023

(05-26-2023, 05:23 PM)omahen Wrote: I would just keep it simple and take Claxton. Leave Phoenix out.

Someone pointed out that Claxton is a CAA guy.  Not sure Cuban is their favorite owner right now.  If someone is going to take the risk of being ‘Brunsoned’ a year from now, it makes more sense for it to be Phoenix with much connective tissue.