Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - youzigizag - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 08:44 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: I think their is a decent change the Nets trade Mikal this offseason. They are stuck in no where land. They may decide to wait out until next free agency when Donovan Mitchell is free. That is a tough wait though. I think eventually Mikal is moved. Look at what a decently skilled, lengthy player with decent bball fundamentals on both sides of the floor did for Dallas. Im talking about PJ. Stop wasting Luka time and time in general on these 10M per "hope he works out" niche players and go spend the money on a modern sized, decently skilled player that doesnt have glaring warts. Go get a stud player in the 20M range. All these sports boards go on and on and on and on about cap crap. The Luka clock is getting louder and louder. Nope. I dont have a list of players. Why? Because it will be nullified with lots of posts about cap managements and age of players yada yada yada. Move: THJ Maxi Dwight(unless you think his elite lob deep stats say he is worth his new contract...I dont. Dude has flaws) Green(if you think you can upgrade) I think the bottom line is...Mavs need someone they can rely on. You cant rely on anyone other than Luka and Irving...and you arent going to get that guy bargain bin shopping worrying about the cap. If Mikal Bridges was gettable, a FOR SURE two way baller you can rely on, I would offer up anyone not Luka, Lively and draft assets. Assuming you would still have decent core that could compete in Playoffs. Im aware that OKC, Houston and other teams can outbid us. It was more about trying to get a reliable player that produces at a high level. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - SleepingHero - 03-19-2024 NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral) A few teams in the east are monitoring Paul George, per @johnhollinger “Keep an eye on Paul George, by the way. Presumably, if there was a max extension sitting around for him, he would have signed it by now; I think it’s fair to say a couple of cap-room teams in the East are, um, ‘monitoring’ this.” RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - Chicagojk - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 09:11 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral) You know Morey is sniffing around there. Probably doesn't matter if Embid is not healthy though. Tough to get a player to willingly leave LA if salaries are close. Will be interesting if things change if the Clippers have a disappointing playoff. I think Jrue Holiday is another interesting name. I don't think the dregs of the league will get his attention. But what happens if Philly makes a big push. It could put Boston in a real tough position with their already big salary commitments. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - omahen - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 08:44 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Not a question for now, but this offseason how do we make this team as on of the top 4 in the west for the next 3-4 years? Those teams are all good...and mostly young. You also have some up and coming teams. Injuries factor in, but I think you want to be positioned closer to the top rather than battling out for the play in every year. The Nuggets are the perfect example. They can get a way with their B game on most nights. When they really want it or in the playoffs, you know Jokic will get close to 40 and a triple double. How can Dallas get there without relying on a A Luka and Kyrie game every night? This is a very good point and I agree that the only solution for this is to diversify offense to be less centered around Luka and Kyrie, especially when they don't play. And that offense can't be THJ chucking contested prayers, imho. That is why I am hoping they design a few plays for PJ and see if he is the guy capable of taking that role. If not, they need to bring in another player. If healthy, Mavs probably should make it to top6 this season. Phoenix has really tough schedule and it would be a disaster to finish below them. Sacramento is a bit more tricky and those 2 games against them will likely be deciding. While I believe Mavs should make it to top6, I am worried how much of a cost will that take. It is not just about making it to top6, it is also about bringing everyone healthy and in top form to playoffs. (03-19-2024, 09:23 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: You know Morey is sniffing around there. Probably doesn't matter if Embid is not healthy though. Tough to get a player to willingly leave LA if salaries are close. Will be interesting if things change if the Clippers have a disappointing playoff. I think everything related to Boston depends if they win it this season. If yes, I could see JRue declining his PO and sign a long term deal at a bit lower average value. Lets say something like a four year deal at 100 mil. If they dissapoint again, things might get tricky. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - Scott41theMavs - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 09:25 AM)omahen Wrote: If healthy, Mavs probably should make it to top6 this season. Phoenix has really tough schedule and it would be a disaster to finish below them. Sacramento is a bit more tricky and those 2 games against them will likely be deciding. It's essentially the season, wrt the Mavs taking care of business against the Kings. If they can't get serious and win those two games (both of them, dammit) - and their defense should do it - then they deserve to be in the playin and get their butts handed to them. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - loki - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 08:44 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: I think their is a decent change the Nets trade Mikal this offseason. They are stuck in no where land. They may decide to wait out until next free agency when Donovan Mitchell is free. That is a tough wait though. I think eventually Mikal is moved. Cam was benched recently which makes me think he could be available. They're definitely more likely to move him than Mikal, at least until they strike out on Donovan Mitchell. Finding a sensible deal is tough though. I doubt a 25 1st gets it done. Do you give up a protected 31 1st along with something like THJ+Kleber? Seems like a pretty steep price for a role player. If they still have interest in Green you could possibly build something around him. I've gone back and forth on DFS, but at this point I don't think he's enough of an upgrade over DJJ to justify spending any trade assets. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - mvossman - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 12:17 PM)loki Wrote: Cam was benched recently which makes me think he could be available. They're definitely more likely to move him than Mikal, at least until they strike out on Donovan Mitchell. Finding a sensible deal is tough though. I doubt a 25 1st gets it done. Do you give up a protected 31 1st along with something like THJ+Kleber? Seems like a pretty steep price for a role player. If they still have interest in Green you could possibly build something around him. With the addition of PJ I'm not sure we need to be focusing on a big wing as that final piece. I am leaning more towards a two way player that can play point of attack defense, shoot and provide a little creation. Green is too timid, Exum too fragile and DJJ can't shoot. In an ideal future those three make up the bench with Omax and Gafford and we land a starting POA defender using Timmy and picks. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - KillerLeft - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 02:29 PM)mvossman Wrote: With the addition of PJ I'm not sure we need to be focusing on a big wing as that final piece. I am leaning more towards a two way player that can play point of attack defense, shoot and provide a little creation. Green is too timid, Exum too fragile and DJJ can't shoot. In an ideal future those three make up the bench with Omax and Gafford and we land a starting POA defender using Timmy and picks. As long as PJ Washington’s shooting slump is temporary, and I believe it is, I am right there with you. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 03-19-2024 (03-19-2024, 02:29 PM)mvossman Wrote: With the addition of PJ I'm not sure we need to be focusing on a big wing as that final piece. I am leaning more towards a two way player that can play point of attack defense, shoot and provide a little creation. Green is too timid, Exum too fragile and DJJ can't shoot. In an ideal future those three make up the bench with Omax and Gafford and we land a starting POA defender using Timmy and picks. Agreed but what you described is exactly what Mikal Bridges is, he just happens to be a big wing as well. Curious if anyone knows anything about Cam Johnson's POA defense. All the defensive tape I can find on him just highlights ISO defense which I don't care nearly as much about. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - loki - 03-20-2024 (03-19-2024, 02:29 PM)mvossman Wrote: With the addition of PJ I'm not sure we need to be focusing on a big wing as that final piece. I am leaning more towards a two way player that can play point of attack defense, shoot and provide a little creation. Green is too timid, Exum too fragile and DJJ can't shoot. In an ideal future those three make up the bench with Omax and Gafford and we land a starting POA defender using Timmy and picks. Anyone in mind that might be attainable? You're probably going to have to compromise on some of those qualities unless Boston wants to donate Jrue. I could see a Marcus Smart or Dillon Brooks being an option if you can stomach the questionable shooting. Caruso would be solid but doesn't offer a ton of playmaking. Bruce Brown? He's also not a great shooter and I'm not sure he's that impactful defensively. Dejounte Murray fits the bill on paper (if you can motivate him to defend again). However, if he can't play with Trae I'm not sure he would be any better with Luka/Kyrie. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - youzigizag - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 12:18 PM)loki Wrote: Anyone in mind that might be attainable? You're probably going to have to compromise on some of those qualities unless Boston wants to donate Jrue. Caruso...all the negativity about him on the offensive side...every time I watch him play the dude is handling the ball. I get it...he can kind of facilitate and sucks at shooting. The ball is always in the guys hands it seems Djaunte was playing good hard defense against Dallas earlier this year late game in a close one. Dude can at least one on one defend well. Was frustrating Luka. The issue about him wanting the ball is a red flag. Beyond that...its a risk...but guys like this that show they can play...do it in playoffs a majority of the time. I would put money on Murray playing hard defense in playoffs. This board and discord seem to hate Smart. I have never understood it. Straight dog that is always disrupting the other team. This is one of those areas where if its because of Luka fit I will die on that hill claiming the fit guys are wrong. Any team needs his disruptiveness. He always hitting 3s when I watch too. But I get that career/history 3 stats matter. Brooks gives effort...never been a big fan of his game though. He does try at least. Is Thybulle a POA? His 3 supposedly has gotten better. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - mvossman - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 12:18 PM)loki Wrote: Anyone in mind that might be attainable? You're probably going to have to compromise on some of those qualities unless Boston wants to donate Jrue. I believe Caruso makes the most sense of that group. I think he provides enough playmaking (you don't need a ton with both Luka and Kyrie) can shoot well enough to stretch the floor, and he is an elite perimeter defender. He is also one of the most likely available in trade. With only one year left (in the offseason), not sure what the cost would be. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - RGP1981 - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 12:18 PM)loki Wrote: Anyone in mind that might be attainable? You're probably going to have to compromise on some of those qualities unless Boston wants to donate Jrue. *cough, cough, cough* Brought up this name lots of times before... he wouldn't be my 1st pick if Mavs only had Luka... but since there is Luka and Kyrie to generate plays, then Quentin Grimes is perfect for the SG role. Kyrie Grimes/Green Luka PJ Lively/Gafford I can't see anyone else who would be easily available AND fit the role better. BTW, I could live with Brooks between Luka/Kyrie but I'm not sure if having Smart between them will achieve the necessary balance on offense. Brooks is shooting the three at 37% on 5x 3PA while Smart is only at 31% on almost 7x 3PA. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Keep Eye on PG13 This Offseason - The Jom - 03-20-2024 Brooks and Smart foul out in first half wearing Mavs colors. Can’t go that route unless new ownership is slipping some cash to Adam Silver under the table. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - The Jom - 03-20-2024 (03-19-2024, 08:50 AM)youzigizag Wrote: . . . Last night in the 4th, Maxi screamed at anyone watching “Thou SHALT NOT trade me till Wemby retires!!!!!!!!!!!!” I was watching. Were you? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 01:30 PM)RGP1981 Wrote: *cough, cough, cough* You keep bringing him up and he continues to be very unavailable. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - youzigizag - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 02:22 PM)The Jom Wrote: Last night in the 4th, Maxi screamed at anyone watching “Thou SHALT NOT trade me till Wemby retires!!!!!!!!!!!!” We can argue this forever. Counter argument is Luka fit or length, mobility and spacers are hard to find. I am not opposed to Maxi as a one off on a roster....but I am firmly in the "drain the swamp" of all players with glaring flaws. Again...you can argue it all you want about fit, need...whatever....the dude has major fundamental basketball flaws. Every other team seems to have decent guys...so I am of the belief that Maxi isnt some rare jewel. This team needs fundamental skill upgrades. They are getting better, it seems, at adding more skilled players. Maxi was included with all the other guys on the roster I think have weird issues. I wasnt singling him out. My personal opinion is you need guys that can dribble, pass, catch a pass without fumbling, shoot decently and have a decent feel for the game. Most other teams have these guys playing heavy minutes. We have guys playing heavy minutes with heavy flaws. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 03-20-2024 (03-19-2024, 02:29 PM)mvossman Wrote: With the addition of PJ I'm not sure we need to be focusing on a big wing as that final piece. I am leaning more towards a two way player that can play point of attack defense, shoot and provide a little creation. Green is too timid, Exum too fragile and DJJ can't shoot. In an ideal future those three make up the bench with Omax and Gafford and we land a starting POA defender using Timmy and picks. I've been thinking about this a lot lately and when we get to watch a healthy Exum play I think it changes the conversation in a really big way. Is Exum not a two way player that can defend the POA, shoot and provide a little creation? I say this because with a team that has Luka and Kyrie it's clear that you'll need two things, a big wing who can play weakside defense, help with rebounding and rim protection, space the floor and hopefully create for himself in a pinch and the POA defender that was described above. With PJ Washington and Exum playing and closing games, isn't that what we have? And with Lively/Gafford/Maxi it's kind of pick which center makes the most sense to close that night. I say this knowing every player I just mentioned is under contract next year and I would argue that the only reason we talk about getting that POA defender instead of a big wing is because of Exum's health (which is a valid concern). But when you zoom out, don't we have the pieces and we're really just looking for a talent upgrade? Is PJ really more reliable in his role than Exum is in his? Couldn't we really just be using all our other assets to shop for a talent upgrade for either spot and know that we'll end up with a talented player in either PJ or Exum coming off the bench? I guess what I'm saying is we keep talking as if we're missing a skillset on the roster that we need to shop for and in reality I think we have what we need and just need certain players to stay healthy so why not just take the best wing available regardless of their ideal defensive role? The only downside to taking a PJ upgrade and moving him to the bench (a role that he has been playing all year for a lesser team) is that it's a big role of the dice on Exum's healthy but I've seen enough of him when healthy to know he's exactly the type of player you want slotted next to Luka and Kyrie down the stretch. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - loki - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 12:50 PM)youzigizag Wrote: Is Thybulle a POA? His 3 supposedly has gotten better. He gambles a bit too much on D but is still really disruptive. Would be a big improvement over what we currently have. He's a DJJ level shooter though. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Bulls To Revisit Lavine Trade in Offseason - loki - 03-20-2024 (03-20-2024, 01:02 PM)mvossman Wrote: I believe Caruso makes the most sense of that group. I think he provides enough playmaking (you don't need a ton with both Luka and Kyrie) can shoot well enough to stretch the floor, and he is an elite perimeter defender. He is also one of the most likely available in trade. With only one year left (in the offseason), not sure what the cost would be. I'm kind of leaning Caruso too. He won't be cheap. Definitely going to take more than a 1st as a lot of contenders would be willing to offer that. Probably something like Green+1st would give you a shot. I'm not sold yet that they should do that though. I guess it maximizes their chances of a title over the next couple years, but Caruso is already 30. It's not hard to imagine Green putting it all together defensively with another team while Caruso declines. What would really be nice is a Caruso/Green platoon where they can both go all out for 24 mpg. |