Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - SleepingHero - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 02:19 PM)surfpuckmd Wrote: I think he's been less bad than Grant Williams this season so I suppose that is an upgrade. I don't think he was worth the price we paid. That's my argument. We're actually very much in agreement here. I did not think PJ was worth anywhere near the 2027 first. I felt the ability to go into the summer with 3 picks trumped what I perceive is a minor upgrade over Grant Williams. But I offer you two different viewpoints. First, I really love what Jason Terry said a couple of pages back. Looking at the last 4 trades for the Mavs, they've spent 2027, 2028, 2029, and 2030 and have netted: Kyrie Irving Daniel Gafford PJ Washington Omax Usually a player of Kyrie Irving's caliber is worth 3 FRP alone. The fact they got someone of that caliber for so cheap has allowed them to spend a little more elsewhere. In the aggregate the Mavs have used their assets pretty remarkably well. Of course this has only worked cause Kyrie has worked out. That was the biggest risk out of all the deals. Let's hope Kyrie continues to work out. 2nd view point: There has a been a lot of smoke that Kidd, and the front office didn't think certain guys fit and that we needed an upgrade. Of course we did need that, but after the TDL we've heard Luka begging for a backup center, how Grant Williams grated on the locker room, and that Holmes was frustrated in Dallas. The Mavs trimmed the fat and upgraded at each step. Again. I agree PJ was a huge risk and an overpay, but overall the Mavs roster building has been consistent in incremental improvements. I hope it pays dividends this 2nd half of the season. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - omahen - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:18 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Dallas can pay him more. If they want him badly enough I'm sure they'll get him. As FGump explained, they can't pay him more. Bought out player gets the value of his contract (unless he negotiates for less in the buyout). THe original team pays the difference between the buyout agreement and his new salary. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - KillerLeft - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:41 PM)omahen Wrote: As FGump explained, they can't pay him more. Bought out player gets the value of his contract (unless he negotiates for less in the buyout). THe original team pays the difference between the buyout agreement and his new salary. I'm not sure I follow "gets the value of his contract." Can you elaborate? I have seen in several places that the Mavs can offer more money, so if that it is incorrect it's widely incorrect. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - Scott41theMavs - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:11 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: @AnthonyIrwinLA Dallas is his best path to reviving his value for his next contract. However, after reading how badly LA wants him, Rich Paul and Lebron generally get what they want since they own the league. I'll be pleasantly surprised if we're able to bring him back. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - Jmaciscool - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:43 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I'm not sure I follow "gets the value of his contract." Can you elaborate? I think - and I'm no CBA expert - it means that if a player is bought out then some portion of that contract is paid for by the new team the player signs with based on the prorated amount remaining (I think). So the original team gets to save a little money for a player they no longer want/need and the player gets to move to a different team without losing money. Win-win. But because the amount is based on the original contract the player can't get additional money, so the fact that the Mavs have more available doesn't have an impact. At least that's my understanding. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - omahen - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:43 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I'm not sure I follow "gets the value of his contract." Can you elaborate? Lets say SD has a 20 mil contract and he agrees to buyout at full value. Toronto will pay 20 mil minus whatever he gets from Mavs. If I understand correctly, the ability to pay more would come into play if Mavs would sign someone into their remaining MLE past this season. Lets say, if SD agreed to a multiyear deal at 5 per or whatever space Mavs have left. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - KillerLeft - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:55 PM)Jmaciscool Wrote: I think - and I'm no CBA expert - it means that if a player is bought out then some portion of that contract is paid for by the new team the player signs with based on the prorated amount remaining (I think). So the original team gets to save a little money for a player they no longer want/need and the player gets to move to a different team without losing money. Win-win. But because the amount is based on the original contract the player can't get additional money, so the fact that the Mavs have more available doesn't have an impact. Is this new, or is there any other reason to believe national guys might not know this? Because I'm seeing discussion on twitter from people I normally trust about how the Mavs have more of their MLE left than LA, etc. And, even with your explanation, I still don't get it. Most buyouts end up signing for the Minimum, and I always assumed that was because the minimum exception is all any of the deirable teams had left down the stretch of a season. I've never once heard mention of a link to their former contract. Doesn't mean it's not there, it's just new information for me. Can someone point me towards the original post from FGump? (02-09-2024, 03:57 PM)omahen Wrote: If I understand correctly, the ability to pay more would come into play if Mavs would sign someone into their remaining MLE past this season. Lets say, if SD agreed to a multiyear deal at 5 per or whatever space Mavs have left. Right, that's exactly what I'm suggesting. They CAN pay him more by choosing to do that...RIGHT? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - KillerLeft - 02-09-2024 https://x.com/EricPincus/status/1756038814987137121?s=20 Eric Pincus: "My gut says Dinwiddie chooses the Mavericks, simply because they can pay him more than LAL. Even after set off, Spencer can earn -twice as much in Dallas. That may not be the decider, but usually is https://x.com/EricPincus/status/1756038960999186903?s=20 "That's assuming the Mavericks and Lakers offer whatever they have left in their pro-rated NTMLE's. Both team should need to mind the first apron, but shouldn't be prohibitive." This definitely wouldn't be the first time our FGump was right and the national guys were wrong, but I need some more explanation on this one, because I don't get it. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - MFFL - 02-09-2024 I think the difference is between being waived and bought out. A waived player is released by his team without the players consent and gets the full value of his contract immediately. BUT the player has to go through the waiver wire and can be claimed by another team (and that team assumes the contract). IF the player clears waivers and signs with another team during the remainder of the contract, the original team is reimbursed by the amount the second team pays. A bought out player has his contract terminated by mutual consent. The amount is up to the full amount of the remainder of the contract but usually at a slight discount. This player is a complete free agent and can sign for any amount that is available on the market. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - KillerLeft - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 04:08 PM)MFFL Wrote: I think the difference is between being waived and bought out. This was my understanding, too. Was Dinwiddie not a buyout? Maybe that's what I'm missing. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - mvossman - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:28 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: Again. I agree PJ was a huge risk and an overpay, but overall the Mavs roster building has been consistent in incremental improvements. I hope it pays dividends this 2nd half of the season. A lightly protected first round pick for PJ would have been an overpay, but even if you ignore the two seconds coming back, a significant chunk of that value was to get off a player who was terrible on the court and already becoming a problem in the locker room with 3 and a half more years on his contract. Personally I am at least as relieved to have GWill off this team as I am to have PJ on it. Its a bonus that there is a possibility PJ becomes worth the first by himself. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - MFFL - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 04:09 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: This was my understanding, too. Every report I read said Dinwiddie was being waived. The difference is consent. A player can be waived without his consent. A player can only be bought out WITH consent. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - KillerLeft - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 04:12 PM)MFFL Wrote: The difference is consent. A player can be waived without his consent. A player can only be bought out WITH consent. Great, so why is there disagreement about whether or not there can be a bidding war for him at this juncture? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - MFFL - 02-09-2024 This is what makes it confusing. +++ Shams Charania @ShamsCharania To avoid a $1.5M upcoming contract bonus for games played, the Toronto Raptors are planning to waive Spencer Dinwiddie, sources tell @TheAthletic Major new entry to the NBA’s buyout market who will be coveted by several playoff teams. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - DanSchwartzgan - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:57 PM)omahen Wrote: Lets say SD has a 20 mil contract and he agrees to buyout at full value. Toronto will pay 20 mil minus whatever he gets from Mavs. The other place it might come into play would be if SD took a discount in order to be set free. Say he took $15mm to not have to move to Canada (forgetting proration for a moment). An element of that negotiation is something they call the ‘offset’ language. Toronto might agree that the money SD might receive in the buyout market doesn’t go against what they owe him since he took a sizable discount. So, if SD goes to a Vet Min offer he gets $17mm for the year (again forgetting proration to keep it simple). If Dallas pays him $5mm, he gets back to even. My memory is foggy, but I think something like that happened with DWill, but I could be mistaken. Edit: To address MFFL’s point about waivers, I think (at least in the old CBA), the waiving team only gets back a portion of the new salary up to the Minimum. So, if the new CBA has the same language then SD profits the amount over the minimum he gets. He’s probably trying to get some or all of his bonus back. As FGump said though, Dallas won’t go over the tax. So, the offer would be a portion of the pro-rated MLE up to the tax. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - MFFL - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 04:16 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Great, so why is there disagreement about whether or not there can be a bidding war for him at this juncture? If he was waived then he can't make more than his original contract. He's getting that contract paid in full - all money paid by the new team goes back to the original team. So yes the Mavs can pay more, but none of it goes to Dinwiddie. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - KillerLeft - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 04:18 PM)MFFL Wrote: If he was waived then he can't make more than his original contract. He's getting that contract paid in full - all money paid by the new team goes back to the original team. Yeah, I get that. I guess we need to know whether he was waived against his will or if there was some type of buyout. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - MFFL - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 04:20 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Yeah, I get that. I guess we need to know whether he was waived against his will or if there was some type of buyout. I think he was waived because the Raptors wanted to avoid paying the $1.5m contract bonus for playing 50 games. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - Ghost of Podkolzin - 02-09-2024 (02-09-2024, 03:28 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: I did not think PJ was worth anywhere near the 2027 first. I think it was either the 27FRP or Green. I'd rather Green than the 27FRP. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs Get Gafford ! Mavs get PJ! Dinwiddie might get bought out? - michaeltex - 02-09-2024 Remember the Garth Brooks song "Unanswered Prayers"? Per Jason Quick of The Athletic: “But I would have liked something bold. A trade of Deandre Ayton, for starters. Although his play has spiked for the better in the past month, his first months in Portland were defined by tardiness and tantrums according to team sources. And there has been an eerie resemblance to Hassan Whiteside, the former Blazers’ center whose statistics looked nice, but had little to no impact on a game. The quicker the Blazers can move off Ayton, the sooner I will believe this franchise is headed in the right direction.” |