Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - mvossman - 02-06-2024 (02-06-2024, 09:33 PM)The Jom Wrote: How bout PJ and Kyle Lowry for the unwanted 4 (Morris, Holmes, Hardaway, Williams). I’d pay an unprotected first for that. Why? Holmes and Hardaway will be expiring in the offseason and perfect fodder for trades. All that trade would do is bring us roughly to the cap line. After the first 10 mil you are not accomplishing anything. GWill is looking like a bad contract, but it makes no sense to spend part of an unprotected first to dump him for air when you have no way to replace it. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - youzigizag - 02-06-2024 (02-06-2024, 10:07 PM)Jakeospikez Wrote: Box score plus minus metrics being the end all be all that lots of fans care about is getting tiresome. Need to watch players play. Lamelo has been out most of the year and maybe he's disgruntled that he's stuck there because he was a RFA and wants out and all anyone can do is point to plus minus. GWill had good metrics in Boston Im sure, yet he is clearly not a fit here as a starting 4. Random 4s/5s shoot over him in the paint like he doesn't even exist. PJ has plenty of skill, proper size/length, actually blocks shots, and will likely be much better here. Him being a bad defender in Cha doesn't instantly correlate that he'll suck here. Mavs do their double and swarm scheme and he may be the right guy to play 4 for that scheme cause he is decently quick for a big wing. I'd be fine with PJ. Would prefer someone with a shorter contract like PJs if the Mavs believe in OMax cause they'll expire out sooner and can potentially be used in a trade in a couple of years if OMax is ready to take over. Collins is way more expensive but has only 2 more years and a big expiring. Beef stew would prob be fine also. Whatever the best deal is any of these guys would be ok as starting 4s/small ball 5s. THJ thinks he is the best shooter in the World and chucks too. Only thing is Kuzma has more skill and is 6'9+...which means he has the ability to disrupt with his athleticism. THJ doesnt. I do agree with the defensive stopper role of Prosper. That means something. But is he another DFS with low offensive skill? We saw how that got frustrating. OMax best quality seems to be the ability to drive and finish even if it looks ugly...there is a lot to grow on there. The best thing about it is...he is not afraid and eager to take it to the rim unlike DFS, Maxi and Green his first couple of years. Knowing your role is important...and we need defense over offense. But we have seen what low offensive skilled defenders do. If Kuzma was bought in to what the Mavs were trying to do and they trusted his effort to be that specific person Mavs want...Im willing to take the risk assuming there is not a more well rounded lengthy guy coming on market this summer that Mavs are confident they can acquire. TL;DR = I think I would like to see investment into lengthy, well rounded fundamental players over value, bargain bin fit guys. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - MarkAguirreWrathofGod - 02-06-2024 I’m pretty sure even Kuzma would be fully aware he is 3rd in the pecking order behind two of the best offensive players to EVER play the game. And he would still even probably average 20ppg, just feasting off of easy looks. Imagine replacing GW or DJJ with a 6’10 version of Josh Green. Kuzma would have to buy-in, of course. But our rebounding and defense would probably improve and the offensive potential would go through the roof. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - vfromlmf - 02-06-2024 Luka and Kyrie could’ve used the help tonight. This game is a great example that illustrates my argument that THJ is the odd man out. His shots and minutes were down because he’s TOO SMALL and it’s only going to get worse when Exum returns. This team needs one of Green/Exum on the floor at all times and THJ isn’t taking Luka or Kyrie’s minutes unless it’s getting them to 36 instead of 40. There’s not enough minutes left for another 6’ 5” guard to get 28 minutes per game, and THJ is never going to average 18 points in 14-18 minutes that are available. This negates his value to this team. THJ needs to be moved for more size. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - MarkAguirreWrathofGod - 02-06-2024 (02-06-2024, 11:26 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: Luka and Kyrie could’ve used the help tonight. This game is a great example that illustrates my argument that THJ is the odd man out. His shots and minutes were down because he’s TOO SMALL and it’s only going to get worse when Exum returns. This team needs one of Green/Exum on the floor at all times and THJ isn’t taking Luka or Kyrie’s minutes unless it’s getting them to 36 instead of 40. There’s not enough minutes left for another 6’ 5” guard to get 28 minutes per game, and THJ is never going to average 18 points in 14-18 minutes that are available. This negates his value to this team. THJ needs to be moved for more size. Definitely need another guy that can create his own shot. I thought Hardy looked good again tonight, albeit in limited minutes. THJ, Josh Green and Exum can create at times, in a pinch. But we really could use a 3rd option for when Ky or Luka is sitting. Or sitting out. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - KillerLeft - 02-06-2024 (02-06-2024, 11:26 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: Luka and Kyrie could’ve used the help tonight. This game is a great example that illustrates my argument that THJ is the odd man out. His shots and minutes were down because he’s TOO SMALL and it’s only going to get worse when Exum returns. This team needs one of Green/Exum on the floor at all times and THJ isn’t taking Luka or Kyrie’s minutes unless it’s getting them to 36 instead of 40. There’s not enough minutes left for another 6’ 5” guard to get 28 minutes per game, and THJ is never going to average 18 points in 14-18 minutes that are available. This negates his value to this team. THJ needs to be moved for more size. Luka is not a guard on defense. 6’6” is not small for a guard. What are you talking about? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - vfromlmf - 02-07-2024 (02-06-2024, 11:38 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Luka is not a guard on defense. 6’6” is not small for a guard. What are you talking about? I'm talking about playing defense. Luka doesn't play any defense. Look at the rotations. Dallas played at least 5 minutes tonight with Luka, Ky, Green, THJ on the floor. I don't care if you call them guards, wings, or smalls, or positionless. That's just not sustainable. Now add Exum. He's got a little more beef in the rear end than THJ but he's still too small to regularly play with three of Luka, Ky, Green, and THJ. It's TOO SMALL. Sure, they can be competitive and they can beat a lot of teams if the superstars play 40 minutes and each score 30 but we've seen this team get bullied repeatedly against bigger teams. The Mavs "big wing," forward, power forward, whatever you want to call it i.e. GWill and DJJ each got about 20 min which is probably about right given what we've seen from them this year. But they're small too. It solves part of the Mavs size issues if you replace GWill with a bigger more athletic wing. But that doesn't open up more minutes for THJ, in fact it might cut into his minutes even more. My point is, if you pay attention, there isn't a way to solve the size problem while simultaneously giving THJ enough minutes to justify his role on this team, unless you want to play THJ at the expense of Green/Exum, and I don't. If THJ wants to play 18 minutes and limit himself to a few catch & shoot threes while playing strong defense, fine. Then we don't have a THJ problem. But that's not what THJ does in this league. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - Jakeospikez - 02-07-2024 I don't think the Mavs need playmaking from a big wing. Luka/Exum/Green lineups have looked good. Not sure how many minutes they've played but I bet Kyrie/Exum/Green lineups have been fine as well. OMax has shown decent handles, he's erratic right now but over time seems like it'll be adequate. 3&D with rebounding is more important than playmaking from the big wing. THJ doesn't fit on a team with Luka/Kyrie imo so he needs to be moved. They can't play together all at the same time. Maybe if the Mavs were heavily dependent on THJ as 6th man, a playmaking big wing would be required, but rather play Exum/Green over THJ. Hardy/Seth is sufficient to cover for injuries/rest days. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - The Jom - 02-07-2024 (02-06-2024, 10:19 PM)mvossman Wrote: Why? Holmes and Hardaway will be expiring in the offseason and perfect fodder for trades. All that trade would do is bring us roughly to the cap line. After the first 10 mil you are not accomplishing anything. GWill is looking like a bad contract, but it makes no sense to spend part of an unprotected first to dump him for air when you have no way to replace it. Doh! RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - Knutsen - 02-07-2024 (02-06-2024, 11:11 PM)MarkAguirreWrathofGod Wrote: I’m pretty sure even Kuzma would be fully aware he is 3rd in the pecking order behind two of the best offensive players to EVER play the game. And he would still even probably average 20ppg, just feasting off of easy looks. Imagine replacing GW or DJJ with a 6’10 version of Josh Green. Kuzma would have to buy-in, of course. But our rebounding and defense would probably improve and the offensive potential would go through the roof. And now imagine - maybe for the second half of next season - a starting line-up of Kyrie Luka O-Max Kuzma Lively Now you‘re talking about one of the longest and at the same time most skilled line-ups in the league with two very athletic and defensively focused young guys at the three and at the five and a mismatch for every single defense at the one, two and four positions. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - youzigizag - 02-07-2024 (02-07-2024, 12:50 AM)Knutsen Wrote: And now imagine - maybe for the second half of next season - a starting line-up of I love the size...posters will argue about OMax and Kuzma 3 percentage, though. Also...who is the POA Defender here? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - donzingis38 - 02-07-2024 Really not a fan of Kuzma. I think he's a low IQ player. Who's guarding Booker/KD/PG/Kawhi/SGA/Ant/Fox? Someone like Jerami Grant would be my preference. Maybe even DFS. He fits better and will definitely embrace his role. I also think we need another center to come off the bench. A bit unfair to just rely on Lively. Even Tyson Chandler had Brendan Haywood.. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - F Gump - 02-07-2024 (02-06-2024, 06:20 PM)omahen Wrote: From Fisher: As I watch what's happening in MIL, I am persuaded this snippet is MIL trying to negotiate through the media. I think they badly want to make a trade, but haven't heard of anyone else being interested in Portis except Dallas, which hampers their ability to up the price and extract better offers. They may indeed opt not to deal, but I think their STRONG preference is to change the mix somehow. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - SleepingHero - 02-07-2024 (02-06-2024, 11:38 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Luka is not a guard on defense. 6’6” is not small for a guard. What are you talking about? Is it kind of crazy to say I think 6'6 is becoming small for a guard in today's league? Every year we're seeing dudes get bigger and bigger that can do everything on the court. Obviously 6'6 isn't small (Even though THJ is 6'5, and that isn't small either). But if you don't move your feet or pay attention off ball then it doesn't matter how tall you are. There was a moment last night against the Nets where THJ basically ball watched O'Neal while he pulled for a 3. And this was right after the Nets just hit 4/6 threes to open the 4th and O'Neal hit 2 of those I believe. Kidd called a timeout and that was the last we saw of THJ for the rest of the night. Point is, we need size, but what we're really after is defense with size. THJ is neither, and I agree with vfromlmf that THJ overlaps too much with Luka+Kyrie to have any sort of role on this team. Anyways not trying to derail any conversation. Just my 2 cents. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - RGP1981 - 02-07-2024 If nothing else, can the Mavs FO at least make a trade for Grimes? I could live with this temporarily while they figure out how to upgrade the Forward and backup Center positions. Kyrie................ Exum Grimes............. Green Luka................ THJ New PF............ DJJ/G-Will Lively............... Kleber.......... ABCD, anyone but clown Dwight RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - surfpuckmd - 02-07-2024 (02-07-2024, 12:50 AM)Knutsen Wrote: And now imagine - maybe for the second half of next season - a starting line-up of I don't think that would work very well. That lineup doesn't shoot well enough to play with Luka. I also believe OMax will be a 4. I think he'll play in lineups with someone like Kleber. We need someone next to him who can shoot. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - Okstate819 - 02-07-2024 THJ is the obvious odd man out. I wonder if the simplest trade is THJ and 27 1st for PJ? He really would be a great fit and although giving up 27 hurts it’s better than 27 +omax that it would take to get Kuzma. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - surfpuckmd - 02-07-2024 (02-07-2024, 07:38 AM)Okstate819 Wrote: THJ is the obvious odd man out. I wonder if the simplest trade is THJ and 27 1st for PJ? He really would be a great fit and although giving up 27 hurts it’s better than 27 +omax that it would take to get Kuzma. THJ is a better player than PJ Washington. Giving up THJ for PJ Washington makes some sense in that we would be bigger but adding a 1st for the privilege would be a disaster. Kuzma is a better player than PJ Washington but doesn't really solve our problems. If our best options are to trade our 2027 1st for PJ Washington or Kyle Kuzma, I hope Mark Cuban will just sit on his hands. Or, someone else can sit on his hands until the trade deadline is over. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - Okstate819 - 02-07-2024 (02-07-2024, 07:42 AM)surfpuckmd Wrote: THJ is a better player than PJ Washington. Giving up THJ for PJ Washington makes some sense in that we would be bigger but adding a 1st for the privilege would be a disaster. THJ is not a better player than PJ Washington. Not in any way shape or form. Now factor in this teams need for a versatile 2 way 4 with a 7’2 wingspan and that swap is a no brainer. Also PJ is on a fantastic contract. You certainly would have to add some asset to entice Cha. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Mavs emerge as top suitor for PJ| Rejected deal for Grimes - KillerLeft - 02-07-2024 (02-07-2024, 12:06 AM)vfromlmf Wrote: My point is, if you pay attention, there isn't a way to solve the size problem while simultaneously giving THJ enough minutes to justify his role on this team, unless you want to play THJ at the expense of Green/Exum, and I don't. If THJ wants to play 18 minutes and limit himself to a few catch & shoot threes while playing strong defense, fine. Then we don't have a THJ problem. But that's not what THJ does in this league. Well, V, in full transparency, I am one of the few who did not immediately reach the conclusion that size is what is wrong with the Mavs. Further, when talking to you guys who think this way, it’s clear that you think they’re playing hardaway right now because they have to. I submit that if the type of size you’re asking for was the solution, they probably could have found a way to get much closer with the players on hand. I think they need to trade for a four, sure, but I think the main reason is that Williams has been a disappointment. If he had done what he was expected to do, I’d be fine with this team, personally. Many people who agree with you guys are just looking for an excuse to get rid of Hardaway. That’s as far as logic enters into it for them. I have no problem dealing Hardaway (I’d probably wait until the summer, when he’s expiring and therefore more valuable, and when he’s not the leading bench scorer in the NBA) but he’s playing WELL this year. If you guys think adding a 4, and then giving all of Hardaway’s minutes to Exum/Green while simultaneously expecting DJJ to play the 3(!!) is going to magically make this a good defensive team…idk. Kind of doubt it. I do know that the offense and spacing will suffer if you remove Hardaway, and it already isn’t that great. The problem here isn’t size or defense. It’s coaching. (02-07-2024, 04:57 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: THJ is neither, and I agree with vfromlmf that THJ overlaps too much with Luka+Kyrie to have any sort of role on this team. Idk, man… He’s had a pretty sizable role all year and has looked pretty damn good playing it. |