MavsBoard
Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - KillerLeft - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 01:26 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: The biggest problem the Mavs have is lack of size and physicality. Second to that is spacing. Teams aren't guarding any of our wings except THJ who is is a 6' 5" guard. Leave Green (also a 6' 5" guard), Williams, DJJ wide open and live with the results. Exum hasn't been playing but we all know his jumper is questionable. You can't leave Kuz wide open. He's a better scorer than THJ and he's a 6' 10" starting forward. He's no defensive stopper but he can play enough team defense and he helps on the defensive glass. Guys like OG and Gordon just aren't available.

I’m not sure I agree, but you are sure making a strong case. 

Put a pin in that and tell me what he will cost.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - Smitty - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 11:30 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral)
The Washington Wizards are not demanding two first-round picks for Kyle Kuzma, and the asking price may be lower, per @TheAthletic

“League sources maintain Washington has been holding out for two first-round picks for Kuzma, though team sources indicate that is somewhat overblown. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.”



Player wise I don't mind that deal. Especially since I was defending Dinwiddie hard the other day. But the Mavs essentially push their expiring contracts to this offseason and free up 29 mil. What could they even do with that?

The deal on its own is an upgrade this year, and next imo. The fact that it clears 29M next year is a bonus. Mavs have more flexibility being further away from tax, 1st and 2nd apron. Able to take more money in future trades etc. Also, use it to resign O’Neal. Even Dinwiddie if the cost is low enough.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - vfromlmf - 01-31-2024

An unvarnished review of our young players before we get to Kuzma's cost.

Green has been up and down but at this point he's more Payton Pritchard than Andre Iguodala. I wouldn't be shocked to see him blossom elsewhere. That often happens with a change of scenery after 4 years. But he's not some untouchable gem. He's an aggressive point-of-attack defender who makes mistakes in defensive rotations and gets lost. I love his speed and athleticism though.

Hardy has been lost for most of the year as he's tried to grow as a playmaker. He's done less in his career than Bones Hyland has, and Bones is out of the rotation and on the trading block himself. There's upside with Hardy, for sure. But he's a prospect, not Tyrese Maxey.

OMAX is a giraffe on roller skates. I love the kid and wish him the best but based on what we've seen so far, he's the definition of a D-League prospect. I'm certainly not willing to sacrifice an MVP-caliber season from Luka just in case OMAX turns into something in 3-4 years.

As state above, the deal I like is THJ to IND, for expiring Hield plus Curry and a late Dallas 1st to WAS, for Kuzma to DAL. If push comes to shove I'd part with one of our prospects without too much concern.

Expiring + RJ Hamption + late 1st = Gordon

Expiring + prospect + Late 1st = Kuzma


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - Smitty - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 11:34 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: The better question might be: Why would Brooklyn convert two expiring contracts into two contracts with an extra year each, one of which is attached to a player who won't play, for only a 2nd round pick?

If they aren’t traded at the TDL, THJ and Holmes will likely be used in a bigger trade next year as expirings. Nets simply do the same and use them next year in something bigger. Maybe they like THJ as much as you do. Dinwiddie has reportedly given up this year. Claxton might be gone and you rehab Holmes (again an expiring) before next years TDL. While getting a pick or two this year in the process.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 01:48 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Put a pin in that and tell me what he will cost.

Honestly this is where any Kuzma needs to start.  It hard to talk about him at all without understanding what's being asked.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - KillerLeft - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 01:52 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: An unvarnished review of our young players before we get to Kuzma's cost.

Green has been up and down but at this point he's more Payton Pritchard than Andre Iguodala. I wouldn't be shocked to see him blossom elsewhere. That often happens with a change of scenery after 4 years. But he's not some untouchable gem. He's an aggressive point-of-attack defender who makes mistakes in defensive rotations and gets lost. I love his speed and athleticism though.

Hardy has been lost for most of the year as he's tried to grow as a playmaker. He's done less in his career than Bones Hyland has, and Bones is out of the rotation and on the trading block himself. There's upside with Hardy, for sure. But he's a prospect, not Tyrese Maxey.

OMAX is a giraffe on roller skates. I love the kid and wish him the best but based on what we've seen so far, he's the definition of a D-League prospect. I'm certainly not willing to sacrifice an MVP-caliber season from Luka just in case OMAX turns into something in 3-4 years.

As state above, the deal I like is THJ to IND, for expiring Hield & Curry plus a late Dallas 1st to WAS, for Kuzma to DAL. If push comes to shove I'd part with one of our prospects without too much concern.

Expiring + RJ Hamption + late 1st = Gordon

Expiring + prospect + Late 1st = Kuzma

Not sure I fully understand your offer. Can’t tell if you are suggesting a second or a first. I don’t believe the Mavericks have the ability to offer a late first right now. It seems like because of picks already owed the protections would need to be so light that it’s basically unprotected (making it stupid not to treat it like a high lottery pick). That’s too much value in a deal like this.

I’m not a CBA expert like some of these guys, so I don’t know, maybe there is a way to heavily protect it to the point where it’s a “fake first” and converts into a 2nd or never changes hands at all, but then I don’t think it would have ENOUGH value.

EDIT: You edited, and it’s clear now. I have the same questions above.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 12:52 PM)mvossman Wrote: The Kuz "success" at defense was longer ago, it was as a bench player and the advanced stats are not terribly impressed with his defense even in his LA days (DARKO hates him).  I think there is more reason to believe in Murray than Kuz, but there were plenty on here concerned with his recent defense as well.

Last I checked, Haliburton led the league in DARKO and Kyrie and Luka were both top 10 (I may not be using the best source). Advanced defensive metrics are certainly valuable when starting to look at a player but they aren't something I take as seriously as the eye test when it comes to defense.  It's just a very tough thing to measure with numbers.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - vfromlmf - 01-31-2024

Yeah, I meant a late 1st. The "2st" I wrote originally was a typo that's since been edited.

By "late" 1st I mean that pick should be in the 20s as long as Luka is around and I'm not ready to contemplate a future without him. If Luka leaves this whole thing will move to a vets-for-picks tank and rebuild.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - mvossman - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 01:26 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: The biggest problem the Mavs have is lack of size and physicality. Second to that is spacing. Teams aren't guarding any of our wings except THJ who is is a 6' 5" guard. Leave Green (also a 6' 5" guard), Williams, DJJ wide open and live with the results. Exum hasn't been playing but we all know his jumper is questionable. You can't leave Kuz wide open. He's a better scorer than THJ and he's a 6' 10" starting forward. He's no defensive stopper but he can play enough team defense and he helps on the defensive glass. Guys like OG and Gordon just aren't available.

OG was available, it was just bad timing regarding when we get access to our assets.  That is the kind of player we should be targeting when we have the assets to do it this coming offseason.  There is not a move to make this TDL that will turn this team into a contender (certainly not Kuz).  That is why I think we should be patient, see what we actually have now if these guys ever get healthy and move in the offseason when conditions favor us better.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - KillerLeft - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 02:08 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: Yeah, I meant a late 1st. The "2st" I wrote originally was a typo that's since been edited.

By "late" 1st I mean that pick should be in the 20s as long as Luka is around and I'm not ready to contemplate a future without him. If Luka leaves this whole thing will move to a vets-for-picks tank and rebuild.

But, if you are ready to trade away an unprotected first so far in the future that Luka might not be here, you simply must contemplate where you would be without him. Not to do so would be negligent, imo.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - vfromlmf - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 02:09 PM)mvossman Wrote: OG was available, it was just bad timing regarding when we get access to our assets.  That is the kind of player we should be targeting when we have the assets to do it this coming offseason.  There is not a move to make this TDL that will turn this team into a contender (certainly not Kuz).  That is why I think we should be patient, see what we actually have now if these guys ever get healthy and move in the offseason when conditions favor us better.

There's an argument for that. There's also an argument for win now. I personally don't think this team is too far away.

My priorities are starting forward who can rebound, defend and score with length. Siakam is way better than Kuzma. But I'm not ready to say this team can't win with an upgrade. Kuzma is better than DFS and Bullock.

Second on my priority list would be a five-out center who can close games. Kleber is our guy but ...


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - mvossman - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 02:02 PM)StrandedOnBeauboisHill Wrote: Last I checked, Haliburton led the league in DARKO and Kyrie and Luka were both top 10 (I may not be using the best source). Advanced defensive metrics are certainly valuable when starting to look at a player but they aren't something I take as seriously as the eye test when it comes to defense.  It's just a very tough thing to measure with numbers.

I'm not sure what you are referring to?  Haliburton has a good DARKO, but nowhere near league leading.  If you are talking about defense you are way off.  DARKO says Haliburton sucks at defense, Luka is bad, and Kyrie is not good.

I agree its really hard to judge defense with metrics.  By far the best seem to be EPM and DARKO, and for the most part they are in the ball park of the eye test (better than any other), especially if you look over a big sample (multiple seasons).


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 02:18 PM)mvossman Wrote: I'm not sure what you are referring to?  Haliburton has a good DARKO, but nowhere near league leading.  If you are talking about defense you are way off.  DARKO says Haliburton sucks at defense, Luka is bad, and Kyrie is not good.

I agree its really hard to judge defense with metrics.  By far the best seem to be EPM and DARKO, and for the most part they are in the ball park of the eye test (better than any other), especially if you look over a big sample (multiple seasons).

Ya definitely looking at the wrong stuff.  Can you share where you can monitor DARKO stuff?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - mvossman - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 02:13 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: There's an argument for that. There's also an argument for win now. I personally don't think this team is too far away.

My priorities are starting forward who can rebound, defend and score with length. Siakam is way better than Kuzma. But I'm not ready to say this team can't win with an upgrade. Kuzma is better than DFS and Bullock.

Second on my priority list would be a five-out center who can close games. Kleber is our guy but ...

Yeah, I think we are farther from contention than you do.  They are just so bad at defense, and I am wildly skeptical that putting Kuz in the starting lineup is going to significantly change that.  It would be different if we could have landed either OG or Siakam.

To be honest, I think we got more from Dorian a couple years ago than we would be getting from Kuz.  His defense was crucial to that team.

(01-31-2024, 02:20 PM)StrandedOnBeauboisHill Wrote: Ya definitely looking at the wrong stuff.  Can you share where you can monitor DARKO stuff?

Here you go.  To be honest, I think EPM is a little better, but the Historical career trajectory on DARKO is very useful. 

https://apanalytics.shinyapps.io/DARKO/


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - SleepingHero - 01-31-2024

NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral)
The Houston Rockets are keeping tabs on Clint Capela, Robert Williams III, Kelly Olynyk and Andre Drummond, per @TheAthletic

NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral)
The Brooklyn Nets have ZERO interest in any deal involving Mikal Bridges, per @TheAthletic

He’s completely untouchable


Dime Alerts (@dimealerts)
The Boston Celtics and Phoenix Suns are showing interest in Jae’Sean Tate

(Via @TheAthletic)

[Image: 1752761105338798088.jpg?ex=65cd177b&is=6...ormat=webp]

Dereck Lively II Muse (@DL2Muse)
On Bleacher Report’s Warriors’ trades live stream, they floated this idea out there. Thoughts?

Evan Sidery (@esidery)
The Rockets have quietly repositioned their stance heading into the trade deadline with the intention of making big win-now moves, per @KellyIko (https://theathletic.com/5240648/2024/01/31/houston-rockets-star-hunting-nba-trade-deadline/).

Houston is now willing to relinquish one of their blue chip prospects in exchange for a star-level player.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - vfromlmf - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 02:30 PM)mvossman Wrote: Yeah, I think we are farther from contention than you do.  They are just so bad at defense, and I am wildly skeptical that putting Kuz in the starting lineup is going to significantly change that.  

They'd look a lot better on defense if they could defensive rebound. I also think Exum is their best perimeter defender.

I'd like to see how this team looks fully healthy, with a 6' 10" starting forward replacing THJ's scoring.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - Nowitzki Way - 01-31-2024

The Rockets, like OKC, can get pretty much anyone they want once they decide to go all in with picks and young players.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - Mavs2021 - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 03:10 PM)SleepingHero Wrote:
[Image: 1752761105338798088.jpg?ex=65cd177b&is=6...ormat=webp]

Dereck Lively II Muse (@DL2Muse)
On Bleacher Report’s Warriors’ trades live stream, they floated this idea out there. Thoughts?
I wish that person was the Warriors GM. LOL.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - BigDirk41 - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 03:10 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral)
The Houston Rockets are keeping tabs on Clint Capela, Robert Williams III, Kelly Olynyk and Andre Drummond, per @TheAthletic

NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral)
The Brooklyn Nets have ZERO interest in any deal involving Mikal Bridges, per @TheAthletic

He’s completely untouchable


Dime Alerts (@dimealerts)
The Boston Celtics and Phoenix Suns are showing interest in Jae’Sean Tate

(Via @TheAthletic)

[Image: 1752761105338798088.jpg?ex=65cd177b&is=6...ormat=webp]

Dereck Lively II Muse (@DL2Muse)
On Bleacher Report’s Warriors’ trades live stream, they floated this idea out there. Thoughts?

Evan Sidery (@esidery)
The Rockets have quietly repositioned their stance heading into the trade deadline with the intention of making big win-now moves, per @KellyIko (https://theathletic.com/5240648/2024/01/31/houston-rockets-star-hunting-nba-trade-deadline/).

Houston is now willing to relinquish one of their blue chip prospects in exchange for a star-level player.

We get A first round picks with Wiggins? Yeah I probably take Wiggins with compensation.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: BRK may want multiple 2nds for O'Neal? Mavs interested? - Nowitzki Way - 01-31-2024

(01-31-2024, 03:15 PM)BigDirk41 Wrote: We get A first round picks with Wiggins? Yeah I probably take Wiggins with compensation.

That 2026 1st will probably be a lottery pick too.