MavsBoard
Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - Scott41theMavs - 01-10-2024

(01-10-2024, 05:49 PM)StrandedOnBeauboisHill Wrote: Biyombo just got waived...

Get 'im!!!


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - SkenfromLMF - 01-10-2024

Is it too late to save money on Morris?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - MarkAguirreWrathofGod - 01-10-2024

(01-10-2024, 06:17 PM)SkenfromLMF Wrote: Is it too late to save money on Morris?

Isn’t today the deadline for Morris guarantee?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - Razzmatazz_Hopskidillydoo - 01-10-2024

6 more days before the Kuzma trade.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - F Gump - 01-10-2024

(01-10-2024, 06:41 PM)MarkAguirreWrathofGod Wrote: Isn’t today the deadline for Morris guarantee?

Nope, that has already come and gone.

Biyombo was paid in full. The Grizz wanted the roster space for a diff player.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - SkenfromLMF - 01-10-2024

So there is now a window with which to pursue Biyombo, BUT even a minimum contract at this point would start to eat into the amount we can take back into a trade slot.

How long before 10 day contracts are available?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - F Gump - 01-10-2024

(01-10-2024, 10:46 PM)SkenfromLMF Wrote: So there is now a window with which to pursue Biyombo, BUT even a minimum contract at this point would start to eat into the amount we can take back into a trade slot.

How long before 10 day contracts are available?
  • 10-days are doable now. 
  • Mavs don't have any roster spaces. 
  • Would a 10-day deal be enough to land him?
  • Does this motivate the Mavs to do some trade sooner that leaves them with an empty space? 
  • Or do they even perceive a need for another C?



RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - Scott41theMavs - 01-10-2024

(01-10-2024, 11:46 PM)F Gump Wrote: [*]Or do they even perceive a need for another C?
[*]
Come on, man. Kidd's the coach, not the GM.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Kuminga no longer believes in Kerr| Pascal to be traded - SleepingHero - 01-11-2024

@Con_Chron)
Steph Curry on whether he feels the Warriors need to show the front office by the trade deadline that this group should stay together: "It’s pretty evident that if things stay the same ... That’s the definition of insanity, right? Do the same thing and expect the same result?"


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - SleepingHero - 01-11-2024

(01-10-2024, 11:46 PM)F Gump Wrote:
  • 10-days are doable now. 
  • Mavs don't have any roster spaces. 
  • Would a 10-day deal be enough to land him?
  • Does this motivate the Mavs to do some trade sooner that leaves them with an empty space? 
  • Or do they even perceive a need for another C?

As to point 5, Nico came out early in the season that they were looking at trades to bring in more size and rebounding. Biyombo does that, at a very cheap cost. 

Now the only issue is the roster spots. Point 4 solves that pretty well. A 3 for 1 trade opens up 2 spaces, 1 for Biyombo, and 1 for 10-days pretty easily. 

I think the course is clear imo.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - SleepingHero - 01-11-2024

@wojespn)
The Grizzlies are waiving center Bismack Biyombo, sources tell ESPN. He made a good impact with franchise and could be brought back again. Memphis is expected to add another big on a newly available two-way contract.

NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral)
Dejounte Murray is a name to monitor for the Golden State Warriors, per @anthonyVslater


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - omahen - 01-11-2024

Bleacher is "crazy". Expiring Siakam would cost Indy Jarace Walker (top 10 pick in 2023 draft) and two protected FRP according to them. On the other hand, Hunter and Murray combined (Hunter is on a decent deal and Murray on a great deal) are worth Moody (one more year on his rookie deal, not shown much in his first three years), one FRP and 2 SRP.

A proposed Mavs move for Jerami Grant has Omax in it, so it will not have many fans around here. Other than that, I like.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10104320-nba-trade-ideas-from-latest-rumors-and-buzz


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - omahen - 01-11-2024

Toronto beat writer and Cato discuss potential Siakam to Mavs deal on the Athletic. Seems like Toronto guy would accept bascially best possible Mavs offer. I hope Mavs would be able to negotiate for something less, but I would consider this deal too.

To Dallas: Siakam (more salary needed due to Green poison pill putting Toronto in tax)
To Toronto: Grant Williams, Tim Hardaway Jr., Josh Green, Olivier-Maxence Prosper, 2025 second-round pick (originally belonging to Toronto), 2026 first-round pick

https://theathletic.com/5193654/2024/01/11/pascal-siakam-trade-raptors/


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - Chicagojk - 01-11-2024

(01-11-2024, 08:16 AM)omahen Wrote: Toronto beat writer and Cato discuss potential Siakam to Mavs deal on the Athletic. Seems like Toronto guy would accept bascially best possible Mavs offer. I hope Mavs would be able to negotiate for something less, but I would consider this deal too.

To Dallas: Siakam (more salary needed due to Green poison pill putting Toronto in tax)
To Toronto: Grant Williams, Tim Hardaway Jr., Josh Green, Olivier-Maxence Prosper, 2025 second-round pick (originally belonging to Toronto), 2026 first-round pick

https://theathletic.com/5193654/2024/01/11/pascal-siakam-trade-raptors/

i expect any trade for Siakam (and probably Grant) to hurt.  This is probably closer to reality though.   Question though, I wonder what the split would be if the Mavs could keep one of OMAX, Green or future first.   I wonder what the breakdown would be here for which one the board would want to keep.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - omahen - 01-11-2024

Sacramento offer was Barnes, Huerter, Mitchel and FRP (or potentially more). No indication if this was acceptable to Toronto, but is a deal Mavs could match in quality.

https://hoopshype.com/lists/kings-rumors-pascal-siakam-zach-lavine-kyle-kuzma-harrison-barnes-keegan-murray/


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - Winter - 01-11-2024

(01-11-2024, 08:20 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: i expect any trade for Siakam (and probably Grant) to hurt.  This is probably closer to reality though.   Question though, I wonder what the split would be if the Mavs could keep one of OMAX, Green or future first.   I wonder what the breakdown would be here for which one the board would want to keep.

I'd keep Omax.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - DanSchwartzgan - 01-11-2024

(01-11-2024, 08:41 AM)omahen Wrote: Sacramento offer was Barnes, Huerter, Mitchel and FRP (or potentially more). No indication if this was acceptable to Toronto, but is a deal Mavs could match in quality.

https://hoopshype.com/lists/kings-rumors-pascal-siakam-zach-lavine-kyle-kuzma-harrison-barnes-keegan-murray/

To your point here, I think the Toronto beat writer is out of touch on the market for a potential free agent who can walk for free.  Recent reporting seems to reflect that.  He's asking for two useful players and 3-4 assets.  I suspect the deal is closer to two useful players and one asset.  Or one useful player and one asset.  Teams who give up too many things will only have the MLE to replace what was traded away if things go poorly.  Any one of Green/2027/OMax would be painful.  Losing two plus two rotation players like GWill and THJ won't happen IMHO.

One other thing...I don't believe the writer is correct about Josh's PP causing a LT issue.  The trade machine counts his higher number in team salary.  I believe PP is just a trade matching mechanism and doesn't add to team salary for tax purposes.  Too lazy to look it up, but no one is being paid that salary, so it logically wouldn't count.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - omahen - 01-11-2024

(01-11-2024, 10:05 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: To your point here, I think the Toronto beat writer is out of touch on the market for a potential free agent who can walk for free.  Recent reporting seems to reflect that.  He's asking for two useful players and 3-4 assets.  I suspect the deal is closer to two useful players and one asset.  Or one useful player and one asset.  Teams who give up too many things will only have the MLE to replace what was traded away if things go poorly.  Any one of Green/2027/OMax would be painful.  Losing two plus two rotation players like GWill and THJ won't happen IMHO.

One other thing...I don't believe the writer is correct about Josh's PP causing a LT issue.  The trade machine counts his higher number in team salary.  I believe PP is just a trade matching mechanism and doesn't add to team salary for tax purposes.  Too lazy to look it up, but no one is being paid that salary, so it logically wouldn't count.

I think Toronto side is hoping for "either you pay big or we keep and resign Siakam ourselves". Siakam himself is the first one that might have something to say about that in the summer. 

Interesting for me was that Cato agreed with valuation and didn't provide the counter offer.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - dirkfansince1998 - 01-11-2024

(01-11-2024, 10:05 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: To your point here, I think the Toronto beat writer is out of touch on the market for a potential free agent who can walk for free.  Recent reporting seems to reflect that.  He's asking for two useful players and 3-4 assets.  I suspect the deal is closer to two useful players and one asset.  Or one useful player and one asset.  Teams who give up too many things will only have the MLE to replace what was traded away if things go poorly.  Any one of Green/2027/OMax would be painful.  Losing two plus two rotation players like GWill and THJ won't happen IMHO.

One other thing...I don't believe the writer is correct about Josh's PP causing a LT issue.  The trade machine counts his higher number in team salary.  I believe PP is just a trade matching mechanism and doesn't add to team salary for tax purposes.  Too lazy to look it up, but no one is being paid that salary, so it logically wouldn't count.

Looking back at the last trade deadline. Kyrie's value was at an all time low due to his contract situation and off court issues. Siakam comes with the same questions about his future contract. Two useful players and one asset would be comparable to SD/DFS/1st. Is Siakam worth more/less?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Mavs betting fav for Pascal, THJ+RH shopped?| MIA wants Mitchell - F Gump - 01-11-2024

(01-11-2024, 10:05 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: To your point here, I think the Toronto beat writer is out of touch on the market for a potential free agent who can walk for free.  Recent reporting seems to reflect that.  He's asking for two useful players and 3-4 assets.  I suspect the deal is closer to two useful players and one asset.  Or one useful player and one asset.  Teams who give up too many things will only have the MLE to replace what was traded away if things go poorly.  Any one of Green/2027/OMax would be painful.  Losing two plus two rotation players like GWill and THJ won't happen IMHO.

One other thing...I don't believe the writer is correct about Josh's PP causing a LT issue.  The trade machine counts his higher number in team salary.  I believe PP is just a trade matching mechanism and doesn't add to team salary for tax purposes.  Too lazy to look it up, but no one is being paid that salary, so it logically wouldn't count.

Thanks for saying all this, so I don't have to do it myself.

I think you're right on whether or not Josh's PP would cause TOR a LT issue. PP impacts trade matching, but not payroll and tax totals. And he does remind us that TOR is up against the tax line, just like DAL is, but as long as the salary totals going both ways are very close to the same, neither should go over the tax line.

I also agree the Dallas offer is a bit too rich, in light of the risk of Siakam as a FA. TOR is trying to get out from under that risk, so it's real. I would be in favor of the basic contour of the trade, but whittle down the extras. Something like this:

To Dallas: PS, 2027 SRP
To TOR: THJ, GWill, Green, 2026 FRP (contingent on 2024 conveying, protected 1-10, if either contingency pushes it out of 2026 then it becomes 2027 unprotected)

That leaves Dallas barely under the tax line, with 13 players, but with just enough room to use 1st year players to fill the slot (10-days, promote a 2-way, etc) and still remain tax-free.