MavsBoard
Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - F Gump - 07-17-2023

Circling back around - now would you ....

Ayton-Wainright-Camara
Holmes-McGee-THJ

Can't happen until early Sept. Money is almost identical (only about 179K diff). 3-for-3 means no one has empty slot to fill afterwards, or a need to waive someone and eat their salary to make the bodies fit. Those may be the ONLY 3 that Phx can trade until Dec (except their big 3).

Very imperfect deal. It ignores all the posturing from both camps, about who is or isn't worth what, and what they will and won't do.

But it does a lot. Besides the right money and number of bodies being swapped, it solves (to some degree) "a starting C for Dallas" and "split Ayton into smaller pieces for easier maneuvering for PHX" while still (perhaps fairly) leaving both teams with other possible needs to deal with.

So, would you?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - Jason Terry - 07-17-2023

What if Green wants a crazy number like 20 per?

Caruso is already everything we wish Green could become

Green
Mcgee
Both 2nds?
2028 swap?

More cap friendly as well


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - KillerLeft - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:35 PM)Jason Terry Wrote: What if Green wants a crazy number like 20 per?

Caruso is already everything we wish Green could become

Green
Mcgee
Both 2nds?
2028 swap?

More cap friendly as well

Too rich for my blood. I prefer the deal with Hardy and not too much draft capital.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - F Gump - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:35 PM)Jason Terry Wrote: What if Green wants a crazy number like 20 per?

If that was the case, I suspect Mavs would have moved on. As you say, the trajectory on Green looks a lot like Caruso (if we assume things go right), and Caruso gets about 9.5M. A number like 20M is not even in the right universe.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - Scott41theMavs - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:43 PM)F Gump Wrote: If that was the case, I suspect Mavs would have moved on. As you say, the trajectory on Green looks a lot like Caruso (if we assume things go right), and Caruso gets about 9.5M. A number like 20M is not even in the right universe.

Most folks are presuming at minimum 4/55 or so.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - Jason Terry - 07-17-2023

Caruso
Holiday
Smart

It’s a short list


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - mvossman - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:45 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: Most folks are presuming at minimum 4/55 or so.

I wouldn't say minimum, but thats about right, and with inflation roughly equal to the 9.5 Caruso got.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - mvossman - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:50 PM)Jason Terry Wrote: Caruso
Holiday
Smart

It’s a short list

What is that list?  Maybe if your focused solely on defense but then Thybulle belongs in that list.

I feel like folks are getting carried away with Caruso.  He scores 6 points a game, starts half his games at most and generally averages in the low 20s minutes wise.  That is a good role/rotational player.  Those other guys start every game and play well over 30 minutes a game.  They are in different leagues as players and I am skeptical Caruso could keep up with those guys defensively if had to play those minutes against starting units.  He is a really good defender, but I just don't think he is someone you spend major assets on.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - mvossman - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:25 PM)F Gump Wrote: Circling back around - now would you ....

Ayton-Wainright-Camara
Holmes-McGee-THJ

Can't happen until early Sept. Money is almost identical (only about 179K diff). 3-for-3 means no one has empty slot to fill afterwards, or a need to waive someone and eat their salary to make the bodies fit. Those may be the ONLY 3 that Phx can trade until Dec (except their big 3).

Very imperfect deal. It ignores all the posturing from both camps, about who is or isn't worth what, and what they will and won't do.

But it does a lot. Besides the right money and number of bodies being swapped, it solves (to some degree) "a starting C for Dallas" and "split Ayton into smaller pieces for easier maneuvering for PHX" while still (perhaps fairly) leaving both teams with other possible needs to deal with.

So, would you?

This is another trade you would have to make due to value, which is why I don't see it happening.  When can Holmes be aggregated?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - F Gump - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 06:45 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: Most folks are presuming at minimum 4/55 or so.

That may be true. But if we get away from the rose-colored glasses on him, and look at players with his type of game, even 4/55 is incredibly rich. In relation to what he's worth, look at Thybulle (10.5M). Or Caruso at 9.5M. Batum at 11.7M. And so on.

The reality of the new CBA economics is forcing teams to abandon the "everyone half-good gets a max" mentality and take a hard look at how much a player really offers and how he can fit into a division of limited payroll. If he gives you 9M of production, you CAN'T pay him 14M or so, because you just can't afford it. Hello, loyal hard-working class citizen Powell at 4M, not the (obviously bloated) MLE+ numbers of before. Bye-bye to Theo the Cheerleader, soaking up 2-3M of payroll but adding nothing on the floor. "Most folks" assumed Kyrie wouldn't accept any deal under 200M, and we see how that ended up.

Once they hit the end of their first contract, I think the days of paying for what you only hope a player can do are probably over. It seems to me we are more likely to see teams paying for what they know he can do based on what he has done, and assess versus how it much will cost to sign someone different.


Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 07:25 PM)F Gump Wrote: That may be true. But if we get away from the rose-colored glasses on him, and look at players with his type of game, even 4/55 is incredibly rich. In relation to what he's worth, look at Thybulle (10.5M). Or Caruso at 9.5M. Batum at 11.7M. And so on.

The reality of the new CBA economics is forcing teams to abandon the "everyone half-good gets a max" mentality and take a hard look at how much a player really offers and how he can fit into a division of limited payroll. If he gives you 9M of production, you CAN'T pay him 14M or so, because you just can't afford it. Hello, loyal hard-working class citizen Powell at 4M, not the (obviously bloated) MLE+ numbers of before. Bye-bye to Theo the Cheerleader, soaking up 2-3M of payroll but adding nothing on the floor. "Most folks" assumed Kyrie wouldn't accept any deal under 200M, and we see how that ended up.

Once they hit the end of their first contract, I think the days of paying for what you only hope a player can do are probably over. It seems to me we are more likely to see teams paying for what they know he can do based on what he has done, and assess versus how it much will cost to sign someone different.
I’m in total agreement with you on the reality you lay out. I think we get a MLE level deal done soon and Green is my favorite not named OMax. I have Post Traumatic Brunson Disorder . PTBD


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - The Jom - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 07:25 PM)F Gump Wrote: That may be true. But if we get away from the rose-colored glasses on him, and look at players with his type of game, even 4/55 is incredibly rich. In relation to what he's worth, look at Thybulle (10.5M). Or Caruso at 9.5M. Batum at 11.7M. And so on.

The reality of the new CBA economics is forcing teams to abandon the "everyone half-good gets a max" mentality and take a hard look at how much a player really offers and how he can fit into a division of limited payroll. If he gives you 9M of production, you CAN'T pay him 14M or so, because you just can't afford it. Hello, loyal hard-working class citizen Powell at 4M, not the (obviously bloated) MLE+ numbers of before. Bye-bye to Theo the Cheerleader, soaking up 2-3M of payroll but adding nothing on the floor. "Most folks" assumed Kyrie wouldn't accept any deal under 200M, and we see how that ended up.

Once they hit the end of their first contract, I think the days of paying for what you only hope a player can do are probably over. It seems to me we are more likely to see teams paying for what they know he can do based on what he has done, and assess versus how it much will cost to sign someone different.


Looks that way 2 weeks into the new CBA. Not convinced the market won’t adjust. And even if the trend continues for awhile, how long before these now-under-control costs lead to massive profits that likely precipitate another spending-spree era? 

Cycles, man. Cycles.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - MarkAguirreWrathofGod - 07-17-2023

Why are we discussing 22 yr. old Josh Green as if he is a finished product vs. Caruso who at age 29 almost certainly is. At 22 Caruso wasn’t even in the NBA, I think he was still at A&M and then played a year in G-League or whatever it was called back then. Josh nearly doubled Caruso’s scoring per game last season on 40.2% from 3 in similar minutes. Caruso shot 36.4 Caruso shot 45% from the field, a career high. Josh shot 53% on higher volume (2 more shots per game.)

Caruso is one of the best defenders in the game, I would love him here. But in a couple of years Josh will be two tiers better offensively than Caruso will ever be. Caruso will be on his last contract.

I still think Green has all-NBA defense potential with added knowledge, experience, strength and, importantly, reputation—so that he gets the benefit of the whistle more often. If he’s willing to sign an extension for 4yr-52m, I couldn’t say yes fast enough.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - F Gump - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 08:27 PM)The Jom Wrote: Looks that way 2 weeks into the new CBA. Not convinced the market won’t adjust. And even if the trend continues for awhile, how long before these now-under-control costs lead to massive profits that likely precipitate another spending-spree era? 

Cycles, man. Cycles.

CBA.

It's a hard cap landscape, and bigger spending teams being forced to divide a limited pie among their players, that will be here until the CBA expires in 2030. There are mechanisms that apply only to over-apron teams that essentially work to force them to lower their payroll, mandating into the rules some literal inability to spend, and those are combined with tiered incentives that gives teams reasons to spend "just a bit less" to gain rewards that ensue by being below the next tier.

I agree that teams will be smarter in how they approach cuts, as they move forward. But there's no payroll point in which the bigger spenders aren't considerably incentivized to get their payroll a bit lower, and then another step lower, until you get below the tax line.

It's not a profit issue. It's a competitive balance thing, where teams start losing the ability to add talent. Each team has to figure out a way to navigate that, and "we'll just pay some tax" isn't a very good solution because of the roster-improving limits you start to face as you pass one apron, then another.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - The Jom - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 09:01 PM)F Gump Wrote: It's not a profit issue. It's a competitive balance thing, where teams start losing the ability to add talent.


What I know about the CBA mostly comes from you. But I think you may have stated this a little too narrowly. Another part of the balance seems to be mortgaging the future to maximize the present (which isn’t new). I’m going to go out on a limb and say outrageous overpays aren’t entirely extinct.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - F Gump - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 08:55 PM)MarkAguirreWrathofGod Wrote: Why are we discussing 22 yr. old Josh Green as if he is a finished product vs. Caruso who at age 29 almost certainly is. At 22 Caruso wasn’t even in the NBA, I think he was still at A&M and then played a year in G-League or whatever it was called back then. Josh nearly doubled Caruso’s scoring per game last season on 40.2% from 3 in similar minutes. Caruso shot 36.4 Caruso shot 45% from the field, a career high. Josh shot 53% on higher volume (2 more shots per game.)

Caruso is one of the best defenders in the game, I would love him here. But in a couple of years Josh will be two tiers better offensively than Caruso will ever be. Caruso will be on his last contract.

I still think Green has all-NBA defense potential with added knowledge, experience, strength and, importantly, reputation—so that he gets the benefit of the whistle more often. If he’s willing to sign an extension for 4yr-52m, I couldn’t say yes fast enough.

That's a reasonable assessment in a lot of ways. At the same time, I'm not easily accepting that JG will suddenly be X or Y, that he has never been, and we pay the amount that's reasonable for THAT player that we wishfully hope will appear one day.

And if you want a player to comp offensively, do Austin Reaves, whose offensive production is way better, whose defense is similar or better, and who has only had 2 seasons to improve and looks like he will keep getting better. That's a 4/54 player in this market.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - F Gump - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 09:14 PM)The Jom Wrote: What I know about the CBA mostly comes from you. But I think you may have stated this a little too narrowly. Another part of the balance seems to be mortgaging the future to maximize the present (which isn’t new). I’m going to go out on a limb and say outrageous overpays aren’t entirely extinct.

Thank you. And I do agree, that the rules are one thing, but their impact on behavior (and how teams try to game the system) is still to be written.

There are ALREADY wild overpays imo. See Rockets, Houston. Bad teams with huge cap room to spend, those will happen, and some are going to push the envelope. But those overpays imo are less likely to move the general market, and they do take a team out of the mix to overpay the next time.

The bigger issue I see is that the NBA put some real thought into preemptively closing the workarounds that would allow teams to keep and increase a bloated payroll. Lots of little things --
1 losing TPE's 
2 no MLE at all
3 no ability to aggregate 2+ players to get 1
4 must take less back in trade, can't raise payroll
5 can't stack minimum-salary players to get a more expensive (and presumably more talented) in return.
6 you pick at the bottom if you are over apron 2
7 you can't trade those picks
8 you can't use cash either.

If you draft/develop well and want to PAY YOUR OWN an inflated deal, you can do that. Otherwise, you are out of the game to replace anyone who gets away.

I think teams like GS, LAC, and PHX (and perhaps a couple others) will go as far as they can on the "bust the aprons" road, until their star talent ages out, because they have little choice. But I don't think it's sustainable. And with the way the new rules limit additions to payroll and roster flexibility in trying to get the next pieces you need, I think it will be hard for more teams to jump up and join them, or to want to.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - KillerLeft - 07-17-2023

I’m no CBA expert, but what I learned the last time this happened, when fish was selling “nuclear winter”, is that the brunt of this will take place during the first couple of seasons. Kudos to the Mavs for striking right away and taking advantage of SAC’s poor planning, but the cap only goes up.

Even that Jerami Grant deal, which I hate, won’t be terrible by the time it expires. In fact, nothing signed this summer will look as bad as the last years of Dame, KAT, Gobert or Ayton, imo. The worst move of this summer might end up being that Sabonis extension, actually.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - Reunion Mav - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 08:27 PM)The Jom Wrote: Looks that way 2 weeks into the new CBA. Not convinced the market won’t adjust. And even if the trend continues for awhile, how long before these now-under-control costs lead to massive profits that likely precipitate another spending-spree era? 

Cycles, man. Cycles.

I have been thinking since the new agreement came out that of all the players the over MLE guys really got hurt. The owners now get to balance their spending at their expense. The super Max guys still get paid though the number of not really maximum players will probably go down. I don’t think this cycle will go back. The owners and the players couldn’t do things in a balanced way which led to the Durant Warriors. The owners will never let that happen again IMO.

In addition recent attempts at super teams haven’t worked out well. Built from within teams like Denver look good moving forward. That is the positive incentive not to be tempted to over spend.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Embiid says he'd like to win in PHI "or anywhere else" - cow - 07-17-2023

(07-17-2023, 08:55 PM)MarkAguirreWrathofGod Wrote: But in a couple of years Josh will be two tiers better offensively than Caruso will ever be. 

[Image: doubt-press-x.gif]