Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - HoosierDaddyKid - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 10:10 AM)omahen Wrote: Interesting. I have it difficult to see Mavs starting something like Irving-Luka-GW-PJ-Center. PJ as full time small center also doesn't make a lot of sense, imagine playing that line-up against Denver giants. Moving GW (or PJ) to bench would be most logical conclusion, but we risk that the one relegated to bench is not happy with this. THJ is also redundant with Brandon Miller on the roster. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 09:13 AM)Smitty Wrote: “Dallas’ front office does not view its offseason as complete, and at least one move — JaVale McGee being traded or stretch-waived, as first reported by ESPN — is certain to happen before training camp begins. While Dallas could still trade for a big man, the team is content to enter next season with the centers currently on the roster. This is basically where I thought they were a week ago. If another move doesn’t come (getting less likely daily), I would imagine Powell is the day 1 starter. I do have more hope in Holmes making a contribution than I ever did with McGee, and it’s possible he could end up starting, but Powell and Kleber are going to be the best 5’s on the roster this season. Again. It’s pretty clear that they didn’t accomplish what they hoped with the center position, but I’m a believer in Lively’s potential and they added Williams and O-max, both of whom will be fan favorites, and both of whom are animals of a type that just wasn’t here last season. They are much better situated defensively, that’s for sure. I’m also really happy to see Bullock go, and relieved that the Thybulle thing didn’t work out. Off-season (if over today) gets an A- from me, and that becomes an A+ if they get a rotation contribution from Holmes. (07-14-2023, 08:38 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Maybe they stalled because the Pistons woke up? LOL Maybe they stalled because the MAVS woke up. Bojan is old, no longer fits with this team (bet this discussion was before the Williams domino, and would’ve resulted in him not coming here) and Hayes is not a good NBA player. That trade is gross. So happy it didn’t happen. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023 I think it’s pretty clear that one of the main motivating factors in any THJ talks, from the Mavs’ POV, is to rid themselves of McGee’s contract. Think it is and probably always was a long shot to expect something we like MORE than THJ in return from a deal set with those parameters. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - mvossman - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 09:45 AM)RoyTarpleysGhost Wrote: When THJ was in the group photos at summer league, I was resigned to the reality they couldn't flip him for a center. If he plays defense like he did last year, I don't hate starting Timmy. Green seemed more effective off the bench. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - Tyler - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 10:10 AM)omahen Wrote: Interesting. I have it difficult to see Mavs starting something like Irving-Luka-GW-PJ-Center. PJ as full time small center also doesn't make a lot of sense, imagine playing that line-up against Denver giants. Moving GW (or PJ) to bench would be most logical conclusion, but we risk that the one relegated to bench is not happy with this. Personally, I could easily see Dallas starting that lineup. Both GW and PJ are big, crazy switchable, and capable of defending 1-5. Include OMax in that rotation, and that's 3 athletic wings between 6'6" and 6'8" all 24 or younger. There would be no breaks for opposing offenses. Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 10:31 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: I think it’s pretty clear that one of the main motivating factors in any THJ talks, from the Mavs’ POV, is to rid themselves of McGee’s contract.I agree. Those are the parameters. They could be removed though for the right deal. A sort of negotiation ploy. Say the offer is THJ, Mcgee and the 2nds and they refuse. Take out Mcgee and a 2nd and get the deal done. I’m no cap expert, but we could simply waive Mcgee. Open the roster spot. If we knew there’s interest at the minimum, then he could sign with another team and we recoup the minimum amount from his dead money. I guess we would for both years? Get like $2.8MM back? We could also just not play him and treat it as dead weight until next summer when the expiring PO could be of positive value in trade matching The main thing i want to avoid is the stretch waive. I think we need to eat this now. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - SleepingHero - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 10:57 AM)Tyler Wrote: Personally, I could easily see Dallas starting that lineup. Both GW and PJ are big, crazy switchable, and capable of defending 1-5. Include OMax in that rotation, and that's 3 athletic wings between 6'6" and 6'8" all 24 or younger. There would be no breaks for opposing offenses. Issue is rebounding. Mavs would get absolutely demolished on the boards. PJ/GW/Luka are all great secondary rebounders, but out of those guys who is boxing out the Jokic/Bam/AD/etc. of the league? Heck even a step below with Capela/Ayton/JV/Adams/Robinson. I'd still get PJ, but he wouldn't be the 5. Sure he'd play spot minutes there, as well at some time at the 4, but my ideal lineup would be: Luka Kyrie PJ G-Will Rebounding Center Then when crunch time comes you have the small ball lineup if needed. Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 10:57 AM)Tyler Wrote: Personally, I could easily see Dallas starting that lineup. Both GW and PJ are big, crazy switchable, and capable of defending 1-5. Include OMax in that rotation, and that's 3 athletic wings between 6'6" and 6'8" all 24 or younger. There would be no breaks for opposing offenses.How many guys in the league are 1-5 defenders? Can’t be too many I say that after watching Grant Williams highlights where he constantly takes on the ball handler. He’s definitely on the list of 1-5 guys. Maxi is there. And i already believe in Omax being one. I’m definitely down for PJ as the starting 5. Him and Lively and Maxi would be a lethal combo for years. Add in G Will and O Max and we’re set. Very modern style of players RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - The Jom - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 10:55 AM)mvossman Wrote: If he plays defense like he did last year, I don't hate starting Timmy. Green seemed more effective off the bench. This requires an overly optimistic view of Kyrie’s defense. JG is your starting guard next to KI. Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:01 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: Issue is rebounding. Mavs would get absolutely demolished on the boards. PJ/GW/Luka are all great secondary rebounders, but out of those guys who is boxing out the Jokic/Bam/AD/etc. of the league?Kyrie Luka OMax GWill PJ That’s a massive lineup. I don’t think they would have a problem with rebounding. Maxi and Green both can team rebound RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023 After seeing that GWill can guard 1-5, I really would love to see PJ here. GWill being the POA defender probably isn’t ideal, but I think the overall team defense would be so much more improved it wouldn’t matter as much. Now, that contract, is $16M on the table if no team has approached that number? $15M? I’d include all 3 SRPs for that, maybe add a pick swap in 25 (worded so it’s legal). Maybe get SA or OKC involved as a money release valve? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - Chicagojk - 07-14-2023 If the Pistons did trade for McGee, I think we could all agree the Pistons have an unhealthy fetish on centers. What a weird roster. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:31 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: After seeing that GWill can guard 1-5, I really would love to see PJ here. GWill being the POA defender probably isn’t ideal, but I think the overall team defense would be so much more improved it wouldn’t matter as much. Now, that contract, is $16M on the table if no team has approached that number? $15M? I’d include all 3 SRPs for that, maybe add a pick swap in 25 (worded so it’s legal). Maybe get SA or OKC involved as a money release valve? I agree with your premise, and would still have some interest in PJW. But, I think $18M is the lowest you can go and still get him. I think the closer that contract inches towards the MLE, the more likely Charlotte is to just pay him and keep him. Might even take $20M to get it done. Would that change your opinion? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - SleepingHero - 07-14-2023 Ok yeah I've kind of convinced myself PJ should be the final big move, with a smaller one where the Mavs trade for a rebounder (drummond?) to finish the offseason. Getting PJ seriously opens up this team. The closing lineup of Luka/Kyrie/PJ/G-Will/Kleber is basically the Mavs version of the Warriors Death Lineup. 3-5 are all switchable and can guard 1-5. All of them can shoot 3s. The versatility is incredible to close out the 4th. Getting there is the issue. We still absolutely need a guy that can boxout and rebound for the first 3 1/2 quarters. I have very little faith in Holmes and Lively being that consistently. And Powell? Yeah lol. Either way, THJ+McGee+2 2nds for PJ should be fair. If not then just THJ+2nds and we waive McGee. (07-14-2023, 11:15 AM)Jason Terry Wrote: Kyrie DROOLING. The versatility with Omax was also something I didn't consider. So much defensive potential. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:40 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: I agree with your premise, and would still have some interest in PJW.Absolutely. No interest in WAY overpaying him. I think with the contract GWill got, $16M is even high, but because the rest of the payroll is set up well, the gamble is solid. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - Smitty - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:48 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Absolutely. No interest in WAY overpaying him. I think with the contract GWill got, $16M is even high, but because the rest of the payroll is set up well, the gamble is solid. Starting number of 15M. Gets you at ~4/65. Roughly 16M AAV. I think that’s about right for him. 15,100,000 15,885,000 16,647,750 17,480,137 65,082,887 16,270,721 AAV RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:48 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Absolutely. No interest in WAY overpaying him. I think with the contract GWill got, $16M is even high, but because the rest of the payroll is set up well, the gamble is solid. Well, no idea what he’ll get (maybe just the QO), but it seems clear that his availability starts and ends with his opinion that he’s a $20M per guy and the reluctance of Charlotte to offer that. There’s obviously a reality element where he’ll have to compromise a little, but we don’t really know where Charlotte’s comfort value is. I do remember reading somewhere that they offered $15M per already. So, it’s speculation, but if you’re only interested at $16M per, I don’t believe he’s actually available. I think if/when he wraps his head around that deal he gets it from CHA. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:51 AM)Smitty Wrote: Starting number of 15M. Gets you at ~4/65. Roughly 16M AAV. I think that’s about right for him.Give him a 3+1 PO so if he does as well as he thinks he will we can pay him earlier. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:51 AM)Smitty Wrote: Starting number of 15M. Gets you at ~4/65. Roughly 16M AAV. I think that’s about right for him. Not to belabor, but just to make clear: this is basically what Charlotte wants to pay him. He wants WAY more, witch is 100% of the reason he has not re-signed yet. This is not a situation where the player or team want to improve on one another. This is ALL about them not seeing eye to eye on the contract. The second he agrees to that price point he’s locked up as a Hornet. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023 (07-14-2023, 11:54 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: Well, no idea what he’ll get (maybe just the QO), but it seems clear that his availability starts and ends with his opinion that he’s a $20M per guy and the reluctance of Charlotte to offer that.Ah, I hadn’t paid attention enough to know he was offered that much. I wrote him off as ungettable a while ago thinking Cha would resign him eventually. Very little interest in that case. Too much risk that he is not the guy we’re thinking he is. |