MavsBoard
Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - HoosierDaddyKid - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:10 AM)omahen Wrote: Interesting. I have it difficult to see Mavs starting something like Irving-Luka-GW-PJ-Center. PJ as full time small center also doesn't make a lot of sense, imagine playing that line-up against Denver giants. Moving GW (or PJ) to bench would be most logical conclusion, but we risk that the one relegated to bench is not happy with this. 

On top of that, I seriously doubt Charlotte has much interest in THJ, as long as they are overpaying Rozier on the position. I don't see the two SRP moving the needle and I certainly don't want to include 2027 with all the doubts stated in first paragraph. Charlotte would be probably more interested if we would take Rozier, but Mavs don't have matching contracts for Rozier and PJ.

This SnT would be more possible if Mavs would have the whole Bertans TE. But that train is gone.


THJ is also redundant with Brandon Miller on the roster.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 09:13 AM)Smitty Wrote: “Dallas’ front office does not view its offseason as complete, and at least one move — JaVale McGee being traded or stretch-waived, as first reported by ESPN — is certain to happen before training camp begins. While Dallas could still trade for a big man, the team is content to enter next season with the centers currently on the roster.

If that’s the case, Dwight Powell would be the favorite to retake his starting spot. But multiple team employees have expressed optimism in a rejuvenated Richaun Holmes after the 29-year-old center fell out of the Sacramento Kings’ rotation last season. As Nico Harrison said on Wednesday’s summer league broadcast, “(Holmes) told me he was in jail the last couple years.” The thinking, those sources say, is that Holmes only lost his rotation spot after Sacramento’s offense was reimagined around Domantas Sabonis and will fit better into Dallas’ guard-based schemes.”

This is basically where I thought they were a week ago. 

If another move doesn’t come (getting less likely daily), I would imagine Powell is the day 1 starter. I do have more hope in Holmes making a contribution than I ever did with McGee, and it’s possible he could end up starting, but Powell and Kleber are going to be the best 5’s on the roster this season. Again.

It’s pretty clear that they didn’t accomplish what they hoped with the center position, but I’m a believer in Lively’s potential and they added Williams and O-max, both of whom will be fan favorites, and both of whom are animals of a type that just wasn’t here last season. They are much better situated defensively, that’s for sure. I’m also really happy to see Bullock go, and relieved that the Thybulle thing didn’t work out. 

Off-season (if over today) gets an A- from me, and that becomes an A+ if they get a rotation contribution from Holmes.

(07-14-2023, 08:38 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Maybe they stalled because the Pistons woke up?  LOL

https://twitter.com/mavsfilmroom/status/1679847451455356928?s=46&t=iwQP5yZoJF3Ulzfb9MH7Cg

Maybe they stalled because the MAVS woke up. Bojan is old, no longer fits with this team (bet this discussion was before the Williams domino, and would’ve resulted in him not coming here) and Hayes is not a good NBA player.

That trade is gross. So happy it didn’t happen.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023

I think it’s pretty clear that one of the main motivating factors in any THJ talks, from the Mavs’ POV, is to rid themselves of McGee’s contract.

Think it is and probably always was a long shot to expect something we like MORE than THJ in return from a deal set with those parameters.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - mvossman - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 09:45 AM)RoyTarpleysGhost Wrote: When THJ was in the group photos at summer league, I was resigned to the reality they couldn't flip him for a center.

Gonna be interesting if he or Josh Green starts.  THJ and Hardy playing together doesn’t seem like an ideal fit.

If he plays defense like he did last year, I don't hate starting Timmy.  Green seemed more effective off the bench.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - Tyler - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:10 AM)omahen Wrote: Interesting. I have it difficult to see Mavs starting something like Irving-Luka-GW-PJ-Center. PJ as full time small center also doesn't make a lot of sense, imagine playing that line-up against Denver giants. Moving GW (or PJ) to bench would be most logical conclusion, but we risk that the one relegated to bench is not happy with this. 

Personally, I could easily see Dallas starting that lineup. Both GW and PJ are big, crazy switchable, and capable of defending 1-5. Include OMax in that rotation, and that's 3 athletic wings between 6'6" and 6'8" all 24 or younger. There would be no breaks for opposing offenses.


Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:31 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: I think it’s pretty clear that one of the main motivating factors in any THJ talks, from the Mavs’ POV, is to rid themselves of McGee’s contract.

Think it is and probably always was a long shot to expect something we like MORE than THJ in return from a deal set with those parameters.
I agree. Those are the parameters. They could be removed though for the right deal. A sort of negotiation ploy. Say the offer is THJ, Mcgee and the 2nds and they refuse. Take out Mcgee and a 2nd and get the deal done. 

I’m no cap expert, but we could simply waive Mcgee. Open the roster spot. If we knew there’s interest at the minimum, then he could sign with another team and we recoup the minimum amount from his dead money. I guess we would for both years? Get like $2.8MM back? 

We could also just not play him and treat it as dead weight until next summer when the expiring PO could be of positive value in trade matching

The main thing i want to avoid is the stretch waive. I think we need to eat this now.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - SleepingHero - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:57 AM)Tyler Wrote: Personally, I could easily see Dallas starting that lineup. Both GW and PJ are big, crazy switchable, and capable of defending 1-5. Include OMax in that rotation, and that's 3 athletic wings between 6'6" and 6'8" all 24 or younger. There would be no breaks for opposing offenses.

Issue is rebounding. Mavs would get absolutely demolished on the boards. PJ/GW/Luka are all great secondary rebounders, but out of those guys who is boxing out the Jokic/Bam/AD/etc. of the league?

Heck even a step below with Capela/Ayton/JV/Adams/Robinson.

I'd still get PJ, but he wouldn't be the 5. Sure he'd play spot minutes there, as well at some time at the 4, but my ideal lineup would be:

Luka
Kyrie
PJ
G-Will
Rebounding Center

Then when crunch time comes you have the small ball lineup if needed.


Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:57 AM)Tyler Wrote: Personally, I could easily see Dallas starting that lineup. Both GW and PJ are big, crazy switchable, and capable of defending 1-5. Include OMax in that rotation, and that's 3 athletic wings between 6'6" and 6'8" all 24 or younger. There would be no breaks for opposing offenses.
How many guys in the league are 1-5 defenders? Can’t be too many

I say that after watching Grant Williams highlights where he constantly takes on the ball handler. He’s definitely on the list of 1-5 guys. Maxi is there. And i already believe in Omax being one. 

I’m definitely down for PJ as the starting 5. Him and Lively and Maxi would be a lethal combo for years. Add in G Will and O Max and we’re set. Very modern style of players


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:Harden adamant for LAC| Potential 3-teamer for Siakam lined up? - The Jom - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 10:55 AM)mvossman Wrote: If he plays defense like he did last year, I don't hate starting Timmy.  Green seemed more effective off the bench.


This requires an overly optimistic view of Kyrie’s defense. JG is your starting guard next to KI.


Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:01 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: Issue is rebounding. Mavs would get absolutely demolished on the boards. PJ/GW/Luka are all great secondary rebounders, but out of those guys who is boxing out the Jokic/Bam/AD/etc. of the league?

Heck even a step below with Capela/Ayton/JV/Adams/Robinson.

I'd still get PJ, but he wouldn't be the 5. Sure he'd play spot minutes there, as well at some time at the 4, but my ideal lineup would be:

Luka
Kyrie
PJ
G-Will
Rebounding Center

Then when crunch time comes you have the small ball lineup if needed.
Kyrie 
Luka 
OMax
GWill
PJ

That’s a massive lineup. I don’t think they would have a problem with rebounding. Maxi and Green  both can team rebound


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023

After seeing that GWill can guard 1-5, I really would love to see PJ here. GWill being the POA defender probably isn’t ideal, but I think the overall team defense would be so much more improved it wouldn’t matter as much. Now, that contract, is $16M on the table if no team has approached that number? $15M? I’d include all 3 SRPs for that, maybe add a pick swap in 25 (worded so it’s legal). Maybe get SA or OKC involved as a money release valve?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - Chicagojk - 07-14-2023

If the Pistons did trade for McGee, I think we could all agree the Pistons have an unhealthy fetish on centers. What a weird roster.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:31 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: After seeing that GWill can guard 1-5, I really would love to see PJ here. GWill being the POA defender probably isn’t ideal, but I think the overall team defense would be so much more improved it wouldn’t matter as much. Now, that contract, is $16M on the table if no team has approached that number? $15M? I’d include all 3 SRPs for that, maybe add a pick swap in 25 (worded so it’s legal). Maybe get SA or OKC involved as a money release valve?

I agree with your premise, and would still have some interest in PJW.

But, I think $18M is the lowest you can go and still get him. I think the closer that contract inches towards the MLE, the more likely Charlotte is to just pay him and keep him. Might even take $20M to get it done.

Would that change your opinion?


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - SleepingHero - 07-14-2023

Ok yeah I've kind of convinced myself PJ should be the final big move, with a smaller one where the Mavs trade for a rebounder (drummond?) to finish the offseason.

Getting PJ seriously opens up this team. The closing lineup of Luka/Kyrie/PJ/G-Will/Kleber is basically the Mavs version of the Warriors Death Lineup. 3-5 are all switchable and can guard 1-5. All of them can shoot 3s. The versatility is incredible to close out the 4th.

Getting there is the issue. We still absolutely need a guy that can boxout and rebound for the first 3 1/2 quarters. I have very little faith in Holmes and Lively being that consistently. And Powell? Yeah lol.

Either way, THJ+McGee+2 2nds for PJ should be fair. If not then just THJ+2nds and we waive McGee.

(07-14-2023, 11:15 AM)Jason Terry Wrote: Kyrie 
Luka 
OMax
GWill
PJ

That’s a massive lineup. I don’t think they would have a problem with rebounding. Maxi and Green  both can team rebound

[Image: 200.gif]

DROOLING.  The versatility with Omax was also something I didn't consider. So much defensive potential.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:40 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: I agree with your premise, and would still have some interest in PJW.

But, I think $18M is the lowest you can go and still get him. I think the closer that contract inches towards the MLE, the more likely Charlotte is to just pay him and keep him. Might even take $20M to get it done.

Would that change your opinion?
Absolutely. No interest in WAY overpaying him. I think with the contract GWill got, $16M is even high, but because the rest of the payroll is set up well, the gamble is solid.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - Smitty - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:48 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Absolutely. No interest in WAY overpaying him. I think with the contract GWill got, $16M is even high, but because the rest of the payroll is set up well, the gamble is solid.

Starting number of 15M. Gets you at ~4/65. Roughly 16M AAV. I think that’s about right for him.

15,100,000
15,885,000
16,647,750
17,480,137

65,082,887

16,270,721 AAV


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:48 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Absolutely. No interest in WAY overpaying him. I think with the contract GWill got, $16M is even high, but because the rest of the payroll is set up well, the gamble is solid.

Well, no idea what he’ll get (maybe just the QO), but it seems clear that his availability starts and ends with his opinion that he’s a $20M per guy and the reluctance of Charlotte to offer that. 

There’s obviously a reality element where he’ll have to compromise a little, but we don’t really know where Charlotte’s comfort value is. I do remember reading somewhere that they offered $15M per already.

So, it’s speculation, but if you’re only interested at $16M per, I don’t believe he’s actually available. I think if/when he wraps his head around that deal he gets it from CHA.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:51 AM)Smitty Wrote: Starting number of 15M. Gets you at ~4/65. Roughly 16M AAV. I think that’s about right for him.
Give him a 3+1 PO so if he does as well as he thinks he will we can pay him earlier.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - KillerLeft - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:51 AM)Smitty Wrote: Starting number of 15M. Gets you at ~4/65. Roughly 16M AAV. I think that’s about right for him.

15,100,000
15,885,000
16,647,750
17,480,137

65,082,887

16,270,721 AAV

Not to belabor, but just to make clear: this is basically what Charlotte wants to pay him. He wants WAY more, witch is 100% of the reason he has not re-signed yet.

This is not a situation where the player or team want to improve on one another. This is ALL about them not seeing eye to eye on the contract. The second he agrees to that price point he’s locked up as a Hornet.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:CHA prefers to SnT Washington| 3-teamer for Siakam? - ItsGoTime - 07-14-2023

(07-14-2023, 11:54 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: Well, no idea what he’ll get (maybe just the QO), but it seems clear that his availability starts and ends with his opinion that he’s a $20M per guy and the reluctance of Charlotte to offer that. 

There’s obviously a reality element where he’ll have to compromise a little, but we don’t really know where Charlotte’s comfort value is. I do remember reading somewhere that they offered $15M per already.

So, it’s speculation, but if you’re only interested at $16M per, I don’t believe he’s actually available. I think if/when he wraps his head around that deal he gets it from CHA.
Ah, I hadn’t paid attention enough to know he was offered that much. I wrote him off as ungettable a while ago thinking Cha would resign him eventually. Very little interest in that case. Too much risk that he is not the guy we’re thinking he is.