Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - KillerLeft - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:09 PM)Smitty Wrote: I don’t want the Mavs to trade a FRP for Capela but the fascination with not sending it for what can be considered a final piece has to stop. The Mavs are in win-now mode. Just two years ago they went to the WCF with Brunson, Luka, Bullock, DFS, Powell starting with Dinwiddie and Maxi off the bench. This year they have Kyrie, ‘23 Luka, Green, Williams, *Holmes with THJ and Maxi off the bench. I have no problems spending picks. I’m not one of those guys. I have problems spending my LAST $10 (with no income on the horizon) on a chipotle burrito when what I need is a loaf of bread, some peanut butter and jelly that could keep me going for a week or two while I look for a job. Spending 1sts like this is PRECISELY how the Mavs got into this mess. To get themselves out, they have to WIN trades. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Smitty - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:28 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I have no problems spending picks. I’m not one of those guys. I think what they’ve done so far this year has set them up for now and the future. Again, I don’t know if Capela is the one that puts them over the top this year but there’s clearly interest from the Mavs FO and if THEY think he’s IT, the FRP should not get in the way. There is a window this year to be as competitive as anyone in the West. In addition to negotiating a deal with their star player, the Celtics still have to complete the Grant Williams sign-and-trade with Dallas. Though Williams has already made his farewell and the deal has been agreed upon, the sides are still finalizing details in what appears to be a complex deal with several draft picks moving in different directions. – via Jared Weiss @ The Athletic RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - KillerLeft - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:23 PM)Smitty Wrote: This is what I would do but if we would all do it, it’s probably too good to be true. Not sure if that’s how the deal will actually look, but in THIS economy, two 1sts, Bey AND Hunter seems like enough for Siakim. Lower than what we’d thought he’d go for the past couple of seasons, but then again he’s not locked into a contract anymore. That might be even a little steep, from some people’s POV. And, I do NOT think anyone would ask for a 1st from Dallas for Capela, especially if they’re giving up THJ. I agree that the dumping of McGee has value - only reason I’m worried. I really hope Cuban’s desire to avoid the tax isn’t overriding common sense about the worth of the assets involved. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Smitty - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:33 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Not sure if that’s how the deal will actually look, but in THIS economy, two 1sts, Bey AND Hunter seems like enough for Siakim. Lower than what we’d thought he’d go for the past couple of seasons, but then again he’s not locked into a contract anymore. That might be even a little steep, from some people’s POV. This would fall short of the tax line by ~6M. I fully believe that Cuban will now try to avoid it this season. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Ghost of Podkolzin - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 01:41 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I like Bey a lot. Don’t like him as a 3. Kammrath and I argued for an entire summer about this. He thought Bey’s athletic profile was underwhelming for an NBA 3, and I argued that he’d be a 4 in the league. So far, that’s what he has been. You could start Bey next to GWill quite easily. It's moot bc I don't see TOR giving up Siakom without Bey. I'm a firm believer that when your two superstars are Luka/Kyrie, you go bigger at the 3 and 4: *A Flex SF-PF at the 3 (someone like T.Eason) --- GWill at the 4 *B Flex F-C at the 5 (someone like Z.Collins) This said, could we use GWill as our POA defender? If so, I'd love to move Green, THJ, Holmes, Outgoing Wood, McGee, and perhaps 27FRP to acquire *A and *B. Luka, Hardy Kyrie, Curry *A, OMax G.Will, Maxi *B, Powell, Lively This gives us incredible flexibility in the future. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - SleepingHero - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:19 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: This has been a great off season, and for my money, it has been great specifically because the moves made don’t overtly reek of the thinking above. The above mentality has dictated all of the mistakes of the past few years, but this summer feels different to me. We'll see. I understand where you're coming from and I actually agree the inclusion of 2027 for just Capela is an overpay. I just think the Mavs are better off being as good as they possibly can be in the short term no matter what. Capela solves the center issue in the short term quite well. And this deal does cap off basically their entire list of goals they set out to begin the summer. They'd have addressed almost every issue we had going into the summer. The only one they're lacking a bit is an additional defensive wing and maybe some more consistent bench scoring. This "insider" really trying to become the next Windy https://twitter.com/Dc3daM/status/1678487884905476119 Skyline Report (ATL news & rumors) (@Dc3daM) Why would they guarantee Bruno’s contract RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Smitty - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:39 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: We'll see. I understand where you're coming from and I actually agree the inclusion of 2027 for just Capela is an overpay.That and you’re only left with Holmes as a negative contact going forward, who’s an expiring next year and big enough salary to use in a meaningful trade. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Chicagojk - 07-10-2023 These are always fun to discuss, very rarely happen though. Any interest in Otto Porter. He seems to be the prototype this team has focused on this offseason. The issue is he very rarely is on the court. But I could see him in a DFS lite role playing with Luka RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - HAguiar95 - 07-10-2023 Hardaway, McGee, unprotected '28 DAL 1st swap for Capela. If we're giving a 1st ('27 have to be very lightly protected due to BKN or it has no value) we have to be getting one of the young ATL/TOR pieces. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Smitty - 07-10-2023 https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1678491963983806464?s=20 RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Tyler - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:47 PM)HAguiar95 Wrote: Hardaway, McGee, unprotected '28 DAL 1st swap for Capela. If the deal is truly Hunter/THJ/Bey to Toronto, Siakam/McGee to Atlanta, and Capela to Dallas, then that leaves Toronto about $3.7mm over the tax line. So my guess is that a player who makes between $3.7mm and $8.6mm (what Dallas has left under the tax) would also go from Toronto to Dallas. The guys that fit (who weren't recently signed) are Precious, Flynn, Dick (has he officially signed yet?), Porter, Young, and Barnes (haha yeah right). Anyone on that list that you'd be willing to trade a 1st for? Offhand, I think Precious would be a good fit. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - JamesConway912 - 07-10-2023 2030 unprotected 1st round pick swap to SAS for Grant Williams 2027 1st to ATL/TOR for Capela Uffff if that’s where we’re headed. Absolutely zero safety net going forward for what? Two rotation players who will never sniff an allstar game? I know we’re in full kumbaya mode here on this board right now, Lively will be the next Tyson, Grant will be the next Matrix and somebody will probably come up with a new way to look at Capela but holy smokes guys. Really not a fan if true. The unprotected pick swap for Williams doesn’t get talked about nearly enough here but moving a 1st for Capela in 2023 is a bad move Imo on another level. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Mavs2021 - 07-10-2023 These rumoured three way trades are trash. Why are we allegedly paying a 1st for Capela + OPJ for THJ + McGee. I don´t see how Capela has much higher value than THJ and the other two are just retired with valid contracts. McGee might be a knucklehead, but at least he´s no pimp. No thanks. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Tyler - 07-10-2023 I also wouldn't sleep on the possibility that the holdup with the GW deal isn't trade matching but the picks. We still have zero clarity on the two seconds we're supposed to be getting. Maybe there's some way to turn them into a late 1st to send to Toronto without parting with our own. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Chicagojk - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:55 PM)Smitty Wrote: https://twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1678491963983806464?s=20 What is the thoughts on the Indy offer? Do they have their and any other first round picks? JamesConway912 - JamesConway912 - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 02:19 PM)mvossman Wrote: Capela is not the final piece. He is a better stopgap than Holmes/Powell. Its not about being afraid to send out that first. Its about getting good value from that pick. Capela is not it. This. He’s close to what Bogut was when he got here. Minimum player on his next contract. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Mavs2021 - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 03:06 PM)Tyler Wrote: I also wouldn't sleep on the possibility that the holdup with the GW deal isn't trade matching but the picks. We still have zero clarity on the two seconds we're supposed to be getting. Maybe there's some way to turn them into a late 1st to send to Toronto without parting with our own. There better be. Teams paid 1sts to get off Valanciunas and Adams. Now we are paying a 1st for a possibly declining Capela. That´s dumb asset management again. Toronto is trying to trade Siakam on an expiring deal (pressure), Atlanta is trying to upgrade their roster while trying to get rid of Capela (pressure) and we are paying for it? Yeah no thanks. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Chicagojk - 07-10-2023 BTW, the Raptors have had a weird few years. I actually liked their team last year but it just didn't work. Massai is regarding as one of the best GM's in the league...and he probably is. But he has made some odd moves the last few years. I think the fans wanted them to tank a time or two at the end of the season, but he made win now moves. Odd fitting team. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Smitty - 07-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 03:06 PM)Tyler Wrote: I also wouldn't sleep on the possibility that the holdup with the GW deal isn't trade matching but the picks. We still have zero clarity on the two seconds we're supposed to be getting. Maybe there's some way to turn them into a late 1st to send to Toronto without parting with our own. This would be ideal and alleviate everyone’s heartburn about the cost to acquire a legit starting center. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: ATL wants Siakam?| PHI matches Reed deal - Mavs2021 - 07-10-2023 If Siakam goes to the Pacers, I´d offer to take Jalen Smith into our remaining TPE and to swap McGee + a couple of seconds for Theis. Much better deal than Capela imho. Then you can really do it by committee with Smith/Theis/Kleber/Powell/Holmes/Lively until a fitting legit starting C trade comes around. |