Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
|
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - Mavs2021 - 04-15-2023 (04-15-2023, 01:57 AM)IamDougieFresh Wrote: Starters Yeah that is a somewhat of a best case we can realistic hope for in terms of quality and knowledge of our MBT, but even that is making one very positive assumption: the Turner trade. The suggested trade is basically only feasible, if the extension of Turner came with a very defined extend&trade framework between him and the Pacers. Something like "if we receive one 1st pick unprotected and an expiring contract, we' ll trade you to a team of your choice". RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - HAguiar95 - 04-15-2023 One trade I feel would solve most of our problems is: Turner/McConnell/Smith for #10/Bertans/Bullock/McGee Doncic/McConnell Irving/Hardy Green/Hardaway Smith/Kleber Turner/Powell RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - ItsGoTime - 04-15-2023 These 1 frp for Turner trades kinda baffle me when they were asking for 2 when he was expiring. I understand it’s a #10 pick, but now that he’s a multi year contract they have got to be asking for more, right? If in fact they are actually looking to trade him, which I don’t think is likely. Gafford seems like the best, most available option out there to me. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - Mavs2021 - 04-15-2023 (04-15-2023, 05:20 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: These 1 frp for Turner trades kinda baffle me when they were asking for 2 when he was expiring. I understand it’s a #10 pick, but now that he’s a multi year contract they have got to be asking for more, right? If in fact they are actually looking to trade him, which I don’t think is likely. Did they get the two 1sts? There is at least a world, where this handshake agreement between the Pacers and Turner exists, because it was mutually benefitial. Pacers have to hit the salary floor this season and instead of losing Turner for nothing in the summer they extend him on a tradeable contract to extract some value. Turner gets additional secure money and a trade promise. There is a chance this happened, but that does not mean, that we´d be Turner´s preferred trade destination. I like Gafford. I already liked him, when the Bulls gave him away for nothing. Was another of those "nothing"-moves people here always say don´t matter. Just like to point out that tonight. Capela 12/8/0, two stls, minus 8 Claxton 5/10/0, three blsk, minus 20 Reed 11/4/0, two stls, plus 5 Now by no means am I saying that Reed is as good as Claxton or Capela, who started the games, but from a pure asset management/roster construction standpoint, it´s simply not worth to lose first round picks for the salary and production difference between Capela/Claxton and Reed. Claxton would cost at least two 1st round picks and Capela is an expiring contract in six months. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - ItsGoTime - 04-15-2023 (04-15-2023, 05:38 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: Did they get the two 1sts? There is at least a world, where this handshake agreement between the Pacers and Turner exists, because it was mutually benefitial. Pacers have to hit the salary floor this season and instead of losing Turner for nothing in the summer they extend him on a tradeable contract to extract some value. Turner gets additional secure money and a trade promise. There is a chance this happened, but that does not mean, that we´d be Turner´s preferred trade destination.No idea, maybe they did and didn’t like the returning players. Either way, like Ujiri, they are sitting on their value, not dropping it, and with a multi-year contract, first, there’s little reason for them to actually trade him. Second, they should be asking for more value, not less. Would not have a problem with a Gafford and Reed offseason. I will say, I think Reed is more offensive than defensive kinda like a better McGee, while still young (more upside), but I think his body type at a MLE type contract would work well on this team. Then there is the added benefit that we finally have a very different big group to work with. Add in Hendricks to start at PF and this team could be promising. Kyrie/Green/Luka/Hendricks/Gafford Hardy/THJ/Bullock/Maxi/Reed That’s all assuming we could get Gafford and Reed while not losing anything significant on the team. Edit: Also, I really dislike that about those who do that around here (bolded). There have been so many gems lost for the sole purpose of chasing stars it is ridiculous. How much better off would we be if we had Gafford and Markannen on this team right now? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - loki - 04-15-2023 I think Turner could be had for #10. Two years left on his contract is the perfect time to deal him. If the Pacers wait until the trade deadline or until he's an expiring the offers will drop off significantly. Should Dallas pay that much? I wouldn't hate the move, but Turner doesn't solve their rebounding problems. I think the Mavs are better off spending their best asset on a wing, whether in a trade or taking someone in the draft, and looking for a more affordable center. I'd prefer something like Bullock + 27 1st for Gafford. Not sure that Washington would go for that deal directly so you might need to find a 3rd team or hope they have interest in a Wood S&T. I don't see Reed going anywhere. He's restricted and the Mavs don't have the ability to outbid the Sixers. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - Mavs2021 - 04-15-2023 (04-15-2023, 06:52 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: No idea, maybe they did and didn’t like the returning players. Either way, like Ujiri, they are sitting on their value, not dropping it, and with a multi-year contract, first, there’s little reason for them to actually trade him. Second, they should be asking for more value, not less.I agree 100% with you, if this was an "honest" extension. That means Turner is happy to stay in Indiana and he won´t be traded under the previous Pacers evaluation of two first round picks. There is also the possibility that Turner wants to leave. Indiana tried to trade Turner at the deadline and did not find a deal to satisfy all parties. As a result the Pacers/Turner entered this virtual "sign&trade" agreement that is highly benefitial for Turner, the Pacers and the team trading for Turner. It´s a win-win-win situation. Turner agrees to a two year extension worth 29M/year. There is no way he could have gotten such a good deal in free agency. In exchange Pacers do not lose an asset for nothing in the summer, but instead enter some pre-defined trade conditions agreement with Turner. Meanwhile the new team gets Turner on a very reasonable remaining contract. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - ItsGoTime - 04-15-2023 (04-15-2023, 07:57 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: I agree 100% with you, if this was an "honest" extension. That means Turner is happy to stay in Indiana and he won´t be traded under the previous Pacers evaluation of two first round picks.I’ve followed this line of thinking from its inception. I don’t see how it’s a win for the Pacers if they aren’t getting their asking price. Maybe it was a deal to make him happy to stay and keep Ind’s payroll low so as to be able to use the money to go shopping? We have no clue, but ever since there have been nonstop trades proposed as if your scenario is true. Turner and Haliburton look legit together, and Turner has the increased role he was asking for. Just so little evidence to say one way or another. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - Mavs2021 - 04-15-2023 (04-15-2023, 08:12 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: I’ve followed this line of thinking from its inception. I don’t see how it’s a win for the Pacers if they aren’t getting their asking price. Cause the Pacers have no asking price as long as Turner does not sign that extension. Turner is a FA and can leave for NOTHING. Pacers used the unique situation of being so far under the salary floor that they could basically pay Turner a "signing" bonus. We don´t know the underlying conditions of the extension. Obviously the Pacers and Turner will not come out and admit they have this pre-arranged trade agreement, which is at best a grey area in the CBA or highly illegal. Only the Mavs would be that stupid. One argument to be made for such an virtual S&T agreement is that Turner got a $17M bonus, that otherwise would have been equally distributed between the whole roster. So basically Turner "stole" $1.1M from every player on the roster with his extension. At least a little awkward situation going into next season, unless you are not there anymore. I agree with you that only under these circumstances, you get him for a 1st + Bertans. Overall trade proposal are always driven by fan bias. Nothing to see there. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - LukaMVP - 04-15-2023 turner ain't the defensive anchor we need and he would be too expensive. turner has a lot to contribute in offense but D and rebounding are the two things we desperately want from our bigman, while at the offensive end we'll be fine assuming kyrie stays. gafford seems like a good target and his price is reasonable. our #10 should be used to draft someone like jarace walker who can make instant impacts, dude is even more ready for NBA than wemby imho. guys like henderson and the thompsons may have higher ceilings than walker but walker is the one that can help us now, an upgraded DFS at the very least. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - Knutsen - 04-16-2023 (04-15-2023, 10:46 PM)LukaMVP Wrote: turner ain't the defensive anchor we need and he would be too expensive. turner has a lot to contribute in offense but D and rebounding are the two things we desperately want from our bigman, while at the offensive end we'll be fine assuming kyrie stays. gafford seems like a good target and his price is reasonable. our #10 should be used to draft someone like jarace walker who can make instant impacts, dude is even more ready for NBA than wemby imho. guys like henderson and the thompsons may have higher ceilings than walker but walker is the one that can help us now, an upgraded DFS at the very least. The obvious all-in move would be going after Draymond Green. I don‘t know what it would take to get him, but if the Warriors were to lose against the Kings they could decide to mix it up for next season. Or Green might pull out of his last year to chase a longer deal somewhere else. Then it depends if we wants to win titles or millions. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - dirkfansince1998 - 04-16-2023 (04-15-2023, 10:46 PM)LukaMVP Wrote: turner ain't the defensive anchor we need and he would be too expensive. turner has a lot to contribute in offense but D and rebounding are the two things we desperately want from our bigman, while at the offensive end we'll be fine assuming kyrie stays. gafford seems like a good target and his price is reasonable. our #10 should be used to draft someone like jarace walker who can make instant impacts, dude is even more ready for NBA than wemby imho. guys like henderson and the thompsons may have higher ceilings than walker but walker is the one that can help us now, an upgraded DFS at the very least. If Turner isn´t a defensive anchor I really don´t know if the player you are looking for even exists. He has been top 5 in blks and DFG% in the paint every single season since 2018. Rebounding doesn´t look as great but that´s more of a Maxi-like problem where he tries to challenge shots and takes himself out rebounding position. Two top 10 finishes in the DPOY voting. Would have been more if it wasn´t for constant injury issues and missed games. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - HoosierDaddyKid - 04-16-2023 (04-14-2023, 06:55 PM)loki Wrote: I'd agree that FVV shouldn't be the lead guard, but without him they have nothing to fall back on. That would be fine except they owe their next pick to the Spurs. I think GTJ gets overpaid by some young team with cap space. To me he looks more like a 6th man rather than a starter. I wouldn't want to be the one giving him a THJ-like deal. FVV at least plays on both ends and could have value to a ton of contenders a year or two down the road. Who the hell is GTJ? RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - IamDougieFresh - 04-16-2023 (04-16-2023, 07:05 PM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Who the hell is GTJ? Garry Trent Jr. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - DallasMaverick - 04-17-2023 (04-16-2023, 02:52 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: If Turner isn´t a defensive anchor I really don´t know if the player you are looking for even exists. He has been top 5 in blks and DFG% in the paint every single season since 2018. Rebounding doesn´t look as great but that´s more of a Maxi-like problem where he tries to challenge shots and takes himself out rebounding position. Right. You could think of Turner as a "Rudy Gobert Lite". Just for 2/3 of the price. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - HoosierDaddyKid - 04-17-2023 (04-16-2023, 07:10 PM)IamDougieFresh Wrote: Garry Trent Jr. Ok, thanks. His shooting has fallen off big time though. It's why he was coming off the bench instead of starting. He'd have to show me he can regain that stroke back before he gets a big deal. That's just me. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - dirkfansince1998 - 04-17-2023 (04-17-2023, 12:20 PM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Ok, thanks. His shooting has fallen off big time though. It's why he was coming off the bench instead of starting. He'd have to show me he can regain that stroke back before he gets a big deal. That's just me. Raptors version of THJ. Considering how the majority of people feels about THJ he is not the kind of player the Mavs should target. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - dirkfansince1998 - 04-17-2023 Mavs should take a look around the league and figure out why all teams have at least one bigmen development project on the bench. Ask themself why they aren´t doing the same. Pick up someone like Udoka Azubuike or look for cheap trades for guys like Charles Bassey (drafted with the pick that the Mavs send to Philly in exchange for Redick and Melli). In a best case scenario find a guy that isn´t getting any minutes on a rebuilding team but has already shown that he belongs in the rotation of an NBA team. Someone like Isiah Stewart or Kai Jones. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - Nowitzki Way - 04-17-2023 (04-17-2023, 12:57 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Mavs should take a look around the league and figure out why all teams have at least one bigmen development project on the bench. Ask themself why they aren´t doing the same. Pick up someone like Udoka Azubuike or look for cheap trades for guys like Charles Bassey (drafted with the pick that the Mavs send to Philly in exchange for Redick and Melli). The Mavs have been terrible at this, and maybe for a long long time. They never seem to have big men prospects. My fandom starts in the early 90s with the 3 J's and i'm not sure i can remember any young big men that we tried to develop. Of course we have Dirk. But what else have we tried in the last 30+ years? Popeye Jones? Sean Rooks? Samaki Walker? Etan Thomas? Bernard James? The list is short and its bad. RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: OG + Siakam on block. Raptors to go in another direction - dirkfansince1998 - 04-17-2023 (04-17-2023, 01:10 PM)Nowitzki Way Wrote: The Mavs have been terrible at this, and maybe for a long long time. They never seem to have big men prospects. My fandom starts in the early 90s with the 3 J's and i'm not sure i can remember any young big men that we tried to develop. Powell. But I am still convinced that they only did it to sell a positive narrative after the Rondo disaster. |