+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - Chicagojk - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 05:32 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Saw some rumors that the Clippers would like to reduce the payroll. But that was prior to the Harden/Lillard trade demands. Right now they are 3.9m over the 2nd apron.
Zubac + RoCo for THJ would get it done. Clippers save 4.7m. Mavs get stop gap solutions for the front court. Obviously takes the Mavs out of any MLE free agent discussion.
Thanks. So would the thinking be the Clippers keep Plumlee then? Not sure THJ would really get a ton of minutes there unless they move some more guys. Right?
Question: which one would you prefer if they were possible (probably not possible)
Sign Williams, trade for Zubac
or
Sign Plumlee to 1 plus 1 and trade for Williams
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - omahen - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 05:37 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Thanks. So would the thinking be the Clippers keep Plumlee then? Not sure THJ would really get a ton of minutes there unless they move some more guys. Right?
Question: which one would you prefer if they were possible (probably not possible)
Sign Williams, trade for Zubac
or
Sign Plumlee to 1 plus 1 and trade for Williams
I don't think Plumlee is significantly better than Powell or Holmes.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - dirkfansince1998 - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 05:37 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Thanks. So would the thinking be the Clippers keep Plumlee then? Not sure THJ would really get a ton of minutes there unless they move some more guys. Right?
Question: which one would you prefer if they were possible (probably not possible)
Sign Williams, trade for Zubac
or
Sign Plumlee to 1 plus 1 and trade for Williams
I think option one is cheaper. But also more difficult to pull off. Trading for Williams is going to cost more than a 2030 2nd round pick.
RoCo/Zubac isn´t the only possible combination. It´s possible to expand the trade or exchange a couple of names. Could even try to work them into the Holmes trade.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 07-02-2023
Can we include Wood in any sort of Allen hypothetical?
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - mvossman - 07-02-2023
Don't get the idea of spending our remaining assets on another 5. We already spent significant assets there. If we don't expect Lively to play heavy minutes by year 2, then he made no sense at 12. In my mind a Holmes/Powell/Maxi stopgap should be fine for one season.
The Timmy for Zubac/Roco does make some sense except there would be no point in signing Powell in that scenario.
Assuming we don't use 27 this offseason, then we basically started with 10 and exceptions. We spent 10 on our biggest needs (4/5) but it will take a little patience. After that move, we were not going to remake the starting lineup this season with exceptions. Getting one of those two RFAs we are targeting with the MLE would be the most we can hope for. It would also make sense if we could send out one of our small wings for a bigger wing, but don't know if that is in the cards.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - StrandedOnBeauboisHill - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 06:00 PM)mvossman Wrote: Don't get the idea of spending our remaining assets on another 5. We already spent significant assets there. If we don't expect Lively to play heavy minutes by year 2, then he made no sense at 12. In my mind a Holmes/Powell/Maxi stopgap should be fine for one season.
The Timmy for Zubac/Roco does make some sense except there would be no point in signing Powell in that scenario.
Assuming we don't use 27 this offseason, then we basically started with 10 and exceptions. We spent 10 on our biggest needs (4/5) but it will take a little patience. After that move, we were not going to remake the starting lineup this season with exceptions. Getting one of those two RFAs we are targeting with the MLE would be the most we can hope for. It would also make sense if we could send out one of our small wings for a bigger wing, but don't know if that is in the cards.
If you traded for Allen you are most likely including Lively, not the 27 firsts (or maybe it takes both?)
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - dirkfansince1998 - 07-02-2023
Should also mention that if it really comes down to it the Clippers could simply stretch/waive RoCo.
Jason Terry - Jason Terry - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 04:28 PM)StrandedOnBeauboisHill Wrote: I feel like both those RFAs make sense and can be had for the MLE. Thybulle at the MLE is an overpay and I don’t see Boston spending money on Williams (I believe stein said something similar).This is where I’m at right now. Williams/Thybulle are the top options in SnT. If we miss out on those I’m looking at Oubre/Saric
Curious how the board feels about one of those player vs the other. I love Thybulle and we got an Aussie thing going already but Williams is probably a better fit because his size although at the end of the day you’re probably asking either to guard the same guys.
Either one plus a trade for a center with the scraps (Nurk is starting to make a lot of sense) is a good offseason but still not easy to pull off.
Then finish it off by taking Nurkic in the Dame trade
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - Okstate819 - 07-02-2023
One thing to note is the new rule where you can accept a player via trade using the MLE. This could theoretically happen with Boston if they decided to match Grant but we’re leary of the tax to the point of looking for someone to offload Rob Williams or Horford.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - Luka77 - 07-02-2023
Does a rebuilding Portland team really need an almost 27 yo Thybulle? Mavs should just trade for him somehow.
Then offer GW the MLE if possible. Both of those guys on the roster fit into the culture and fill a void.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - F Gump - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 06:57 PM)Okstate819 Wrote: One thing to note is the new rule where you can accept a player via trade using the MLE.
Not until July 2024
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - Okstate819 - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 07:12 PM)F Gump Wrote: Not until July 2024
Ah ok. Will add an interesting dynamic next year.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - Jason Terry - 07-02-2023
Portland wants to get off of Nurkic. He has negative value and it would be an Ayton like move
Dallas gets: Nurkic and Thybulle SnT
Portland gets: THJ and expiring Bullock
Portland could then flip THJ and pickup whatever assets(2nds?) he generates. It could be an even match salary-wise with Thybulle at just under MLE price. Still preserving the full MLE for a G Williams offer
Nurkic/Lively/Powell/Maxi is a decent center rotation for how cheap it would come. Use the Holmes and Mcgee contracts as the next trade matching pieces
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - omahen - 07-02-2023
Personally, I am really out on Nurkic. Can't switch on anyone. I think there is no chance to build a decent defense with him next to Luka and Kyrie. He also has a not so small contract for three more years. I would really have to believe in Thybulle big time, to take Nurkic money. I don't believe in Thybulle that much.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - SleepingHero - 07-02-2023
Zubac would be a personal favorite. Of course my first choice would be for Allen and would make the 2027 1st available. Don't see a realistic deal unless they want Maxi+McGee which I'm not sure they would at all.
If the Mavs could somehow someway grab Zubac acting as a 3rd team in the Harden deal, and Thybulle acting as a 3rd team in the Lillard deal, this summer could still be great.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - dirkfansince1998 - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 07:52 PM)omahen Wrote: Personally, I am really out on Nurkic. Can't switch on anyone. I think there is no chance to build a decent defense with him next to Luka and Kyrie. He also has a not so small contract for three more years. I would really have to believe in Thybulle big time, to take Nurkic money. I don't believe in Thybulle that much.
Probably comparable to other big bodies for the regular season like Adams or Valanciunas. They cannot switch but are willing and able to do the dirty work for 25-30 minutes per game. If Nurkic isn´t throwing a tantrum when he gets benched in late game siuations he would be a good fit.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - KillerLeft - 07-02-2023
Have to say…Thybulle talk is scaring me to death.
He’s literally another Ntilikina. A little bigger, but imo he’s NOT a Brown type who can guard bigger guys. Great point of attack defender, but as we’ve discussed at length there are currently like 6-7 players on the roster who will soak up guard minutes. On offense, he’s not much of a shooter and cannot handle the ball to play-make or even dribble. Not the kind of guy I want clogging the books, personally. Full MLE? No, thank you.
Grant Williams would be infinitely better.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - cow - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 08:15 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Grant Williams would be infinitely better.
I'll make them both.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - mvossman - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 06:03 PM)StrandedOnBeauboisHill Wrote: If you traded for Allen you are most likely including Lively, not the 27 firsts (or maybe it takes both?)
Can we send Lively in a trade? If its Lively and one of our salary filler guards then I am all in. I don't think it makes sense to send both Lively and the 27. That is too much. There are not a lot of options out there where I would send the unprotected 27. Not for Grant's bloated contract and not for a center. Siakam would make sense, but I don't think we have the assets to get that done.
We are not going to be a contender this coming season. Lets get a young defensive player with the MLE and see where we are at after the season. Then we will have a much younger roster and 3 firsts to trade. That is when we make the big move.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Dame Requests Trade, Wants MIA only. - cow - 07-02-2023
(07-02-2023, 09:05 PM)mvossman Wrote: Can we send Lively in a trade?
Don't think so. I read that the Heat signed their draft pick so he wasn't eligible to be included in Dame trade.