+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Stein-Ingram Trade Inevitable| LAL Want Lebron Back On Any Terms (/showthread.php?tid=2444)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Mavs2021 - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 03:53 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Overreacting much? It´s not legit to look at his body of work or performance in his best run but it´s totally valid to predict his future based on one playoff series against the best player in the league. Playing on a dysfunctional team and fighting with the coach.
Still concerning because no matter what happens you cannot pull a Rondo. But I would asume that any team that considers trading for him knows more about the situation than we do. Personally I think that is more concerning than his level of play. After the last season the Mavs should stay away from anyone that could create locker room issues.
In that case stay away from Grant Williams. If Kidd got into it with Wood, I´m sure he´d enjoy Grant Williams suggesting plays for himself during meetings.
(06-27-2023, 03:53 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Overreacting much? It´s not legit to look at his body of work or performance in his best run but it´s totally valid to predict his future based on one playoff series against the best player in the league. Playing on a dysfunctional team and fighting with the coach.
Still concerning because no matter what happens you cannot pull a Rondo. But I would asume that any team that considers trading for him knows more about the situation than we do. Personally I think that is more concerning than his level of play. After the last season the Mavs should stay away from anyone that could create locker room issues.
Remember when everybody here lost their sh*t cause the Cavs gave Markkanen 16M a year. LOL.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - dirkfansince1998 - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 03:56 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: In that case stay away from Grant Williams. If Kidd got into it with Wood, I´m sure he´d enjoy Grant Williams suggesting plays for himself during meetings.
![[Image: 0_BATMAN.jpg]](https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article28378332.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_BATMAN.jpg)
With his track record Kidd should be afraid. Justice will be served.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - SleepingHero - 06-27-2023
If I could give df1998 an award I would.
[/url]
https://giphy.com/gifs/cbs-the-neighborhood-theneighborhood-he-gets-it-1BZSEGf9nGlScdksrc[url=https://giphy.com/gifs/cbs-the-neighborhood-theneighborhood-he-gets-it-1BZSEGf9nGlScdksrc]
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Mavs2021 - 06-27-2023
Can I make a bold prediction? I think the Mavs will stiff Kyrie with something like 120/3 with a team option and if he declines, they´ll find a way to go after Lillard (3-teamer with Kyrie to Clippers?) or Lavine (Kyrie directly) with the Nico and agent connections.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - SleepingHero - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:02 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: Can I make a bold prediction? I think the Mavs will stiff Kyrie with something like 120/3 with a team option and if he declines, they´ll find a way to go after Lillard (3-teamer with Kyrie to Clippers?) or Lavine (Kyrie directly) with the Nico and agent connections.
If we could only be so lucky to get Dame here.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Smitty - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:02 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: Can I make a bold prediction? I think the Mavs will stiff Kyrie with something like 120/3 with a team option and if he declines, they´ll find a way to go after Lillard (3-teamer with Kyrie to Clippers?) or Lavine (Kyrie directly) with the Nico and agent connections.
I had this same thought today. Astute.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Mavs2021 - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:04 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: If we could only be so lucky to get Dame here.
Yeah Lavine seems more realistic, but what about the Lakers.
Kyrie to the Lakers
Hachimura + Bamba + Green + Mavs 2027 +Mavs 2030 to Portland
That seems a very generous offer given Dame´s age and recent injuries.
I think I´d actually feel more comfortable with Kyrie for Lavine straight up.
Also guys never forget about Vucevic for Wood.
I think Vucevic is the perfect MLE leverage target now, and maybe you then push it to 15-17 range using Wood or Holmes in a S&T.
Vucevic is a great rebounder, good 3pt shooter and fits the center rotation well till Lively is ready.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - SleepingHero - 06-27-2023
https://twitter.com/esidery/status/1673798594963316740?s=46&t=Fmdr94oXagcEyy75KJqaFg
Evan Sidery (@esidery)
Max Strus is expected to sign with a team for at least the mid-level exception soon after free agency begins, per @ZachLowe_NBA (https://t.co/IM3g99Lu7Y):
“The amount of Max Strus buzz right now is ridiculous.”
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - mvossman - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 03:43 PM)Smitty Wrote: He’s the only one I’m interested in tbh.
Bullock + ‘27. Hornets want vets and are going to resign Bridges.
https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/news/pick-one-miles-bridges-or-p-j-washington
I like PJ, but I don't think he is worth an unprotected first.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 03:53 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Overreacting much? It´s not legit to look at his body of work or performance in his best run but it´s totally valid to predict his future based on one playoff series against the best player in the league. Playing on a dysfunctional team and fighting with the coach.
Still concerning because no matter what happens you cannot pull a Rondo. But I would asume that any team that considers trading for him knows more about the situation than we do. Personally I think that is more concerning than his level of play. After the last season the Mavs should stay away from anyone that could create locker room issues.
OK, so how should he have performed against Powell 2 years ago? Did he punish us? Did we have to worry about him and not double CP3? I really thought Ayton was going to eat us up. Shame on PHX for matching IND after that instead of taking Turner+ in exchange.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - DallasMaverick - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:02 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: Can I make a bold prediction? I think the Mavs will stiff Kyrie with something like 120/3 with a team option and if he declines, they´ll find a way to go after Lillard (3-teamer with Kyrie to Clippers?) or Lavine (Kyrie directly) with the Nico and agent connections.
I kinda think if they don’t sign him, they’ll look for young players on value contracts.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Smitty - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:26 PM)mvossman Wrote: I like PJ, but I don't think he is worth an unprotected first.
I disagree. I think he's worth the '27 for this Mavs team. It will get traded at some point with the Mavs other picks getting unlocked after this year. Getting a higher upside, younger, better Maxi for this team is ideal.
Reggie is addition by subtraction, as he was literally one of the worst NBA players last year based on advanced stats.
If the Mavs can have a future PJ/OMax rotation at the 4 and Lively/PJ at the 5, then I'm ecstatic!
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - DallasMaverick - 06-27-2023
Another prediction:
Teams are going to start letting their own high-performing veterans walk at the ends of their contracts rather than re-sign them to max or near-max contracts.
In the old days, teams believed they could always dump a high-priced vet with a lot left on the contract, if they were creative. There would always be plenty of other teams with bloated contracts that didn’t fit, or were substantially negative.
But the new CBA changes that dynamic. Overpays really, really hurt. Atlanta shouldn’t have signed John Collins. Phoenix shouldn’t have signed Ayton, and probably Chris Paul. GS shouldn’t have signed Poole.
If someone pays Kuzma $30m, I think they’ll rue the day.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:26 PM)mvossman Wrote: I like PJ, but I don't think he is worth an unprotected first.
PJ is precisely who the Mavs should be looking at. A flex F/C who could eventually start with Lively. PJ or Z.Collins suffices. That and a flex SF/PF like Tate, Hunter, or Eason and we're there. I would be willing to trade Green for either PJ/Z.Collins or Eason, ditto on the 27FRP.
Luka, Hardy
Kyrie, THJ
Bullock, OMax
Eason, Maxi
PJ/Z.Collins, Lively
That's a a balanced 10-man rotation who could compete now, yet has a ton of future. THJ and Bullock are eventually kicked to the curb. When Lively is ready to start, PJ/Z.Collins move to PF, Eason to SF.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - SkenfromLMF - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:30 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: Shame on PHX for matching IND after that instead of taking Turner+ in exchange.
That is NOT how Restricted Free Agency works.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:41 PM)SkenfromLMF Wrote: That is NOT how Restricted Free Agency works.
If they had worked out a S&T prior to IND signing the offer sheet it does. Bottom line is Ayton's performance against the Mavs should have been a buyer beware. As someone already said, he's like Dorothy's friends in one: No Heart, No Courage, No Brain.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - dirkfansince1998 - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:30 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: OK, so how should he have performed against Powell 2 years ago? Did he punish us? Did we have to worry about him and not double CP3? I really thought Ayton was going to eat us up. Shame on PHX for matching IND after that instead of taking Turner+ in exchange.
First of all. Maxi was the primary matchup. Ayton was efficient but the volume wasn´t anywhere close to what it should have been considering that he was shooting nearly 60% from the floor. But as Killerleft already stated. He isn´t a post scorer and relies on guards to create for him. Can score in the pick and roll/pop (midrange).
Looking at the defensive end he was the only guy on the Suns roster that wasn´t getting cooked in isolation against Luka. What would you say if I told you that among all players that defended more than 20 FGA from Luka in the playoffs no one (including Jazz and Warriors) held Luka to a lower FG%.
Or to play your favorit game of selective sample sizes. What about the first round against the Pelicans. 20/10 on 70% from the field. Doesn´t count because it doesn´t fit into the narrative of Ayton´s steady decline?
Not even all that interested in the Ayton topic but the narratives that are being pushed are ridiculous. Suns needed a scapegoat. CP3 and Bridges played worse but Ayton took most of the blame. There´s legit criticism. For example his limited offensive move set or inability to punish mismatches. And obviously a lack of consistent effort on the defensive end and the boards. But there is also a lot to like. Especially if the asking price is as low as the trade talks between the Mavs and Suns suggest.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - cow - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 05:05 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: There´s legit criticism. For example his limited offensive move set or inability to punish mismatches. And obviously a lack of consistent effort on the defensive end and the boards. But there is also a lot to like. Especially if the asking price is as low as the trade talks between the Mavs and Suns suggest.
This is a nice summation. I'm pretty against Ayton, but that mostly has to do with his lack of consistent effort/checking out mentally combined with his contract. If he was on his rookie deal, it would be a much easier sell. And you could still push me into the "sure, why not" camp if we got rid of McGee, THJ, and Bullock. There is always a chance a change of scenery and coaching does him good and while you figure that out, you are going to eat up a year+ of his contract which will make him easier to move. There is potential upside to Ayton both in making the team better and turning him into an asset.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - mvossman - 06-27-2023
(06-27-2023, 04:41 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: PJ is precisely who the Mavs should be looking at. A flex F/C who could eventually start with Lively. PJ or Z.Collins suffices. That and a flex SF/PF like Tate, Hunter, or Eason and we're there. I would be willing to trade Green for either PJ/Z.Collins or Eason, ditto on the 27FRP.
Luka, Hardy
Kyrie, THJ
Bullock, OMax
Eason, Maxi
PJ/Z.Collins, Lively
That's a a balanced 10-man rotation who could compete now, yet has a ton of future. THJ and Bullock are eventually kicked to the curb. When Lively is ready to start, PJ/Z.Collins move to PF, Eason to SF.
I didn't say we shouldn't be looking at PJ, I said an unprotected first is too much, especially considering its coming around the time Luka might force himself out if things go south. That pick is crazy valuable and my preference would be that it gets used to add the final piece, not for another quality rotational player.
He is a good young player, but he is not elite defensively and I don't think you want him to play the 5 unless you want another Powell situation (can't rebound or rim protect like you would want from a 5).
I also don't know why you have Bullock in your starting lineup. He was terrible last year. Timmy was better on both ends of the floor.
And finally, this team has been desperately trying to find a point of attack defender for years (Delon Wright, JRish, ...). Now that we finally have one, not sure why we would be in such a hurry to toss him into a trade.
RE: Trade & FA 2023-24:HOU likes FVV+Brooks| MIA to S/W Lowry if no trade? - DanSchwartzgan - 06-27-2023
There is some confusion about new CBA "aggregation" rules regarding Ayton on another board. It was suggested that after 7/1/23, Ayton can't be traded with multiple players coming back. This is not a concern for 2023. It is a second apron thing, but it doesn't start until the 24/25 season.
In that season, if you are over the second apron, you can't aggregate up or down (can't turn two players into one in a trade and can't turn one into two). That is a big deal because not only are you competitively punished for spending that much, but you have few avenues to fix your mistake. But again, a 24 thing, not a 23 thing. If they really were relatively close to an Ayton trade that included Holmes we know:
1. All the positioning about new coach looking forward to working with him is BS.
2. This was after the drafting of Lively (or we wouldn't have had Holmes to trade).
I did the match and with Irving at $40mm to start, we cross the first apron if we don't include McGee as outgoing (not by much though, so it could be fixed by fine tuning Kyrie down a bit more (though we don't even know if $40mm is a real thing or not). If McGee is outgoing, then we can have the N-TP MLE. In fact, there are a few extra dollars to give to Kyrie or use in a trade spread with Bullock outgoing or use to keep a 15th player on the roster.
Clock is ticking on Reggie. If you don't pick up his guarantee, it has a similar impact to trading McGee if you don't S/W him. You have to account for dead money and a minimum slot to replace him. But with Irving at $40mm, 14 spots and Reggie just straight waived, I have us at $169mm. We will have moved off of two wings in THJ and Reggie, but we only need one and the MLE can provide that.
(06-27-2023, 05:19 PM)mvossman Wrote: I didn't say we shouldn't be looking at PJ, I said an unprotected first is too much, especially considering its coming around the time Luka might force himself out if things go south. That pick is crazy valuable and my preference would be that it gets used to add the final piece, not for another quality rotational player.
Absolutely. PJ attractive? Sure. But at that cost. No way.