(10-20-2021, 10:13 AM)luka_skywalker_77 Wrote: Read this over and over and tell me this doesn't sound weird.
[...]
Are adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine recordable on the OSHA recordkeeping log?
DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers' vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904's recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination at least through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs
www.thedesertreview.com/business/osha-suspends-reporting-adverse-covid-shot-reactions/article_29a63af8-bcd5-11eb-bb3a-b70c12715ffc.html
As an aside, Ryan Cole might be a quack, but he's an exception in a sea of reputable scientists researching this issue. The key here, is that opponents of the anti vaxx camp will use this as the symbol of the movement, the same way they use false claims of voter fraud in the past election. It's purpose is to dismiss legitimate claims of side effects and reputable research from extraordinarily accomplished individuals.
At the end of the day, people reserve the right to care for themselves in a way that protects them--not someone else--because only they have to live with the consequences of that action since the gov't and big pharma has removed themselves from liability. The lies have to end at some point, and most people are coming to that conclusion.
This entire "American experiment" is executed under the "consent of the governed", which is definitely not being adhered to and people will change what needs to be changed despite the oligarchical nature of this modern era's gov't. Authoritarianism always begins as reason, then quickly devolves into the familiar madness and chaos of "order".
@dahlsim I'd say you're almost wasting your time here, but I do come back to post and share information with you specifically and anyone else looking for it with an open mind. People will come around eventually--sooner than later--and when they do, it'll either be too late or it'll be spun so as to protect those involved; i.e. "the science is always evolving".
Good catch @"luka_skywalker_77"
Its outrageous really how openly these things are being done. This is what happen when the public literally supports suppression of expression and information, as long its against their political adversaries of course. We get more of what we support, more suppression.
They in the this case once again our government and its agencies are openly telling us what they will distort and corrupt the data inputs into the medical science statistics and the science we rely on when it comes to forcing vaccinations on the citizens.
Quote:“DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations,” the health agency says on its official website. “OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts.
As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination at least through May 2022. We will re-evaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.”
So adverse effects, as I've been posting about from the beginning of this thread, ARE openly being suppressed. I've referenced the CDC's VAERS site several times and its well known even based on a Harvard study that whatever numbers are reported on that site and similar are under reported. By some estimates as much as 10x underreporting. As recall our friend @"dirkfansince1998" tried to reply they are likely overreported? Not a chance.
Now we see (as if it wasn't already clear) that this sort of corruption and manipulation of the numbers that are reported is being done intentionally across the agencies and enforced through employers as well.
If the safety profile is so strong then why in the world would they feel the need to suppress the reporting of adverse effects / side effects?
We are supposed to trust the science knowing that this is sort of thing is being done to support the mandate of forced vaccinations?
Just recently this statement was made very publicly which also calls into the questions the science and the numbers the public is being given as to what percentage of COVID deaths are vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
https://twitter.com/bbisback_4/status/14...8897158147