05-11-2021, 01:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2021, 01:08 AM by khaled1987.)
(05-10-2021, 11:12 PM)dynamicalVoid Wrote: I am not arguing that you might be on to some scenario where Kemba overachieves with the Mavs. I think some questioned Chris Pauls age and longevity...he has proved the doubters wrong. Paul is a different level than Walker no doubt. You could be very right that Kemba comes to the Maves and provides 2 years of secondary play making that the Mavs need.
But...does a Front Office take that risk on a player of his age, size, injury history and overall game?
Im in the camp of get someone injury free and younger. Your suggestion of getting a gray beard that fits a need for this team might end up being the choice that might reap the best rewards....but does an organization take this risk?
It is all about how do they perceive KP.
Are we really better with him? Do they think he can be healthy in 2 playoff appearances out of 3 in his remaining contract year?
Because if answer is no, which is very possible, then the risk we take on someone like Kemba isn't that much of a risk.
You take a chance on a player who could be very good fit and if it fails, he is an expiring contract.
It is the question if the Mavs think KP is going to be positive or negative value throw near future, if he negative value then cutting one year of his contract is worth it.
(05-10-2021, 11:01 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: https://gph.is/g/ZrGvAJ1
Well, Kemba has been playing well lately too.