Posts: 11,142
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,347 in 3,607 posts
Likes Given: 390
Likes Received: 6,347 in 3,607 posts
Likes Given: 390
Joined: Oct 2020
(05-08-2026, 08:38 AM)Smitty Wrote: @esidery
The Raptors will again attempt to move Jakob Poeltl’s contract this offseason.
Poeltl’s undesirable deal was the reason why Toronto was unable to upgrade the center position this season:
2026-27: $19.5 million
2027-28: $27.3 million
2028-29: $29.5 million
2029-30: $27.3 million
*2029-30 is $5.0 million guaranteed
I know it wasn't popular the first time I mentioned his name as a possibility for using the TPE to acquire more assets, but it has to be on the table, no? What would it take to stomach? This year's pick (#19) plus another unprotected first rounder?
Maybe then you move Gafford for a protected future first? Come away with 3 FRP's in total? Just live with Lively and Poeltl as your main Bigs next season, knowing you're not really a contender anyway? Or maybe TOR likes Gafford and it's a swap there, with all the picks coming from them, and no need to use the TPE...
I think is is going to take mulitple first round picks to move him. I don't think Toronto wants to cross that bridge, so I expect him to be in Toronto next year.
Posts: 3,355
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Joined: Oct 2019
(05-08-2026, 08:41 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: I think is is going to take mulitple first round picks to move him. I don't think Toronto wants to cross that bridge, so I expect him to be in Toronto next year.
We're on the same page then. Would you do it for #19 and next year's first though?
Posts: 5,739
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,276 in 2,696 posts
Likes Given: 3,580
Likes Received: 5,276 in 2,696 posts
Likes Given: 3,580
Joined: Dec 2020
(05-08-2026, 08:38 AM)Smitty Wrote: @esidery
The Raptors will again attempt to move Jakob Poeltl’s contract this offseason.
Poeltl’s undesirable deal was the reason why Toronto was unable to upgrade the center position this season:
2026-27: $19.5 million
2027-28: $27.3 million
2028-29: $29.5 million
2029-30: $27.3 million
*2029-30 is $5.0 million guaranteed
I know it wasn't popular the first time I mentioned his name as a possibility for using the TPE to acquire more assets, but it has to be on the table, no? What would it take to stomach? This year's pick (#19) plus another unprotected first rounder?
Maybe then you move Gafford for a protected future first? Come away with 3 FRP's in total? Just live with Lively and Poeltl as your main Bigs next season, knowing you're not really a contender anyway? Or maybe TOR likes Gafford and it's a swap there, with all the picks coming from them, and no need to use the TPE...
That contract is so bad. 19 is an Evans/Swain type player which would be really nice, and an unprotected pick from Toronto could be very valuable. I'm not sure Gafford is worth a future first (even protected) right now.
Posts: 11,142
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,347 in 3,607 posts
Likes Given: 390
Likes Received: 6,347 in 3,607 posts
Likes Given: 390
Joined: Oct 2020
(05-08-2026, 09:02 AM)Smitty Wrote: We're on the same page then. Would you do it for #19 and next year's first though?
hmm...not sure.
I am a draft guy and like to get as many chances as possible, but that contract is so bad. It would really limit finding opportunities the next few years imo. I think it would constrain you quite a bit.
Posts: 976
Threads: 7
Likes Received: 360 in 206 posts
Likes Given: 28
Likes Received: 360 in 206 posts
Likes Given: 28
Joined: Nov 2019
(05-08-2026, 09:34 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: hmm...not sure.
I am a draft guy and like to get as many chances as possible, but that contract is so bad. It would really limit finding opportunities the next few years imo. I think it would constrain you quite a bit.
I guess I look at it from the perspective of moving Martin makes it much more palatable. It definitely creates hurdles, but 2 picks and jettisoning Martin makes my tolerance go up. What I might be undervaluing is what happens after the extension goes into effect. I know it is bad, but I am also not in the camp we are a destination in the FA classes.
Posts: 3,355
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Joined: Oct 2019
(05-08-2026, 09:34 AM)mvossman Wrote: That contract is so bad. 19 is an Evans/Swain type player which would be really nice, and an unprotected pick from Toronto could be very valuable. I'm not sure Gafford is worth a future first (even protected) right now.
Yes on Evans! Replace Swain with Carr and we're in agreement there. As for Gafford, I think he's absolutely worth a lottery protected FRP for multiple teams.
Posts: 5,739
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,276 in 2,696 posts
Likes Given: 3,580
Likes Received: 5,276 in 2,696 posts
Likes Given: 3,580
Joined: Dec 2020
(05-08-2026, 10:59 AM)Smitty Wrote: Yes on Evans! Replace Swain with Carr and we're in agreement there. As for Gafford, I think he's absolutely worth a lottery protected FRP for multiple teams.
I don't know. He is making a lot of money and he had a very down year. Maybe a team needs a P&R center and realizes his poor fit on the roster. I would be very happy to get any asset for him at this point.
Posts: 10,324
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 4,395 in 2,553 posts
Likes Given: 382
Likes Received: 4,395 in 2,553 posts
Likes Given: 382
Joined: Sep 2019
(05-08-2026, 08:38 AM)Smitty Wrote: @esidery
The Raptors will again attempt to move Jakob Poeltl’s contract this offseason.
Poeltl’s undesirable deal was the reason why Toronto was unable to upgrade the center position this season:
2026-27: $19.5 million
2027-28: $27.3 million
2028-29: $29.5 million
2029-30: $27.3 million
*2029-30 is $5.0 million guaranteed
I know it wasn't popular the first time I mentioned his name as a possibility for using the TPE to acquire more assets, but it has to be on the table, no? What would it take to stomach? This year's pick (#19) plus another unprotected first rounder?
Maybe then you move Gafford for a protected future first? Come away with 3 FRP's in total? Just live with Lively and Poeltl as your main Bigs next season, knowing you're not really a contender anyway? Or maybe TOR likes Gafford and it's a swap there, with all the picks coming from them, and no need to use the TPE...
I'd rather chase Braun if that's the direction, but I think he has reclamation potential unlike Poeltl.
The following 1 user Likes cow's post:1 user Likes cow's post
• Smitty
Posts: 4,458
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 5,274 in 2,240 posts
Likes Given: 4,596
Likes Received: 5,274 in 2,240 posts
Likes Given: 4,596
Joined: Nov 2020
(05-08-2026, 08:38 AM)Smitty Wrote: I know it wasn't popular the first time I mentioned his name as a possibility for using the TPE to acquire more assets, but it has to be on the table, no? What would it take to stomach? This year's pick (#19) plus another unprotected first rounder?
IMO Poeltl is going nowhere. I think TOR would have to give up way too much in draft capital and talent, to get some team to choke down that contract, and will instead opt to ride it out. He first needs to get back on the floor and play well, and stay healthy, so that he is seen as having some value for the team who might trade for him (rather than just being dead money).
Posts: 2,168
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,305 in 755 posts
Likes Given: 3,545
Likes Received: 1,305 in 755 posts
Likes Given: 3,545
Joined: Mar 2020
(05-08-2026, 12:31 PM)F Gump Wrote: IMO Poeltl is going nowhere. I think TOR would have to give up way too much in draft capital and talent, to get some team to choke down that contract, and will instead opt to ride it out. He first needs to get back on the floor and play well, and stay healthy, so that he is seen as having some value for the team who might trade for him (rather than just being dead money).
The only possibility I could envision is a trade involving another bad contract, perhaps with a mismatch of the length of the contract plus draft compensation.
Posts: 3,355
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Joined: Oct 2019
(05-08-2026, 12:31 PM)F Gump Wrote: IMO Poeltl is going nowhere. I think TOR would have to give up way too much in draft capital and talent, to get some team to choke down that contract, and will instead opt to ride it out. He first needs to get back on the floor and play well, and stay healthy, so that he is seen as having some value for the team who might trade for him (rather than just being dead money).
I get it. I agree. The report is the report. That's why I asked the hypotheticals.
Posts: 3,355
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Joined: Oct 2019
@TheDunkCentral
Keep an eye on the Magic potentially moving on from Jalen Suggs this offseason, per @BrettSiegelNBA
“Keep an eye on Orlando possibly looking to cut some salary and make a minor adjustment to their starting lineup, possibly moving on from two-way guard Jalen Suggs after Anthony Black's breakout 2025-26 campaign.”
Posts: 10,515
Threads: 27
Likes Received: 3,495 in 1,948 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Likes Received: 3,495 in 1,948 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Joined: Sep 2019
(05-08-2026, 07:55 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Yeah it will be intersesting to see what they do? Are they keeping money open for 27? I thought they plan to be aggressive this year. I guess they can be flexible.
Rui has played himself into a nice contract this year. No idea what range. They have flexibility with Reaves before he signs. Less so after he signs. Smart can opt out and may very well do that as he is only making 5 million. I think Lebron staying LAL is the best for him. Could he sign for 20-25 million on a short deal? I think the Lakers are good. Not sure they can get to the OKC/SA level anytime soon, but they are definitely in the next group. Being one of the top 5 teams is not a bad place to be. One more thing, I assume they make a move for a center this summer. That seems in the cards.
I don't think Lakers plan is 2027 FA. It is building around Luka. But, they will have huge decisions to make and I think their offseason will be one of the most interesting ones. They have huge flexibility and many different paths they could choose. They could bring the team back and operate over the cap or they can have 50 mil (or even more) of cap space. They could target right role players or they could target a star (through trade using their cap relief and 3 FRPs), filling rest of the team with small contracts.
I think it is clear that this current Lakers team is at least a tier or two behind OKC (and likely San Antonio too). I don't think things would be much different if Luka would be healthy. So, just bringing back this team makes little sense, especially because in that case their options to upgrade would be very much limited. While individually a bunch of players in their main rotation look really good, the sum of all parts just isn't on a high enough level due to many overlapping skillsets, lack of athleticism and two-way ability.
1. LeBron. He is really awesome in the playoffs. But, his skillset overlaps so much with Luka on both ends of the floor that imho it doesn't make sense to invest anything substantial (lets say above MLE) in him when building around Luka. He definitely outplayed that number and should demand more if he decides to play for another season. Lakers can't afford to wait for him.
2. Hachimura. He is one of the best shooters. If he is open, he is deadly accurate and has even been a playoff riser. He is shooting almost 60 % from three this season in the playoffs on a very solid volume. However, he is more or less average defender, athlete, rebounder,... Lakers problem was, when Luka, Reaves and LeBron were all playing, there were simply not enough shots for him to make sense to invest anything substantial in his top ability. If all three remain with Lakers, they need hard nosed defender(s), which Rui is not. He would still be great coming off the bench, but will probably want too much money for such a role. If one of the "big three" goes, than it would make sense to keep him around his current salary.
3. Ayton and Smart player options. I think both had good seasons relative to their salaries. Ayton has been hot and cold as usual, but is playing generally well since all stars. However, he seems to have problems against OKC. Smart has been one of the most valuable players on the team and is exactly the type of player needed next to Luka (a bit better shooting would be a bonus). I kind of hope they both pick their options, but especially Smart has significantly outplayed his 5 mil salary.
Posts: 10,515
Threads: 27
Likes Received: 3,495 in 1,948 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Likes Received: 3,495 in 1,948 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Joined: Sep 2019
(05-08-2026, 01:28 PM)Smitty Wrote: @TheDunkCentral
Keep an eye on the Magic potentially moving on from Jalen Suggs this offseason, per @BrettSiegelNBA
“Keep an eye on Orlando possibly looking to cut some salary and make a minor adjustment to their starting lineup, possibly moving on from two-way guard Jalen Suggs after Anthony Black's breakout 2025-26 campaign.”
This will also be an interesting deal, if it happens. Suggs is a very good two way player, but he is probably overpaid and has problems staying healthy. Still only 24 though.
From Orlando perspective, the prototype of a deal is imho what Denver did with MPJ last offseason. Get a cheaper player that is within at least 80 % of what Suggs is (might be different position) and pay a FRP. Shooting is still Orlando's biggest need. They could offer 2032 FRP or some second rounders.
Suggs is young enough to be interested both for rebuilding teams as well as established enough to be interesting for competing teams.
Posts: 3,355
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Likes Received: 3,450 in 1,638 posts
Likes Given: 3,731
Joined: Oct 2019
The Rockets could get “aggressive” to acquire Donovan Mitchell if he’s available this summer, per @BannedMacMahon
“They’ve got assets… If Donovan Mitchell’s available, that is a guy I could see the Rockets being aggressive to go get.”
(h/t @SleeperRockets)
Posts: 6,727
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 1,410 in 1,034 posts
Likes Given: 1,579
Likes Received: 1,410 in 1,034 posts
Likes Given: 1,579
Joined: Oct 2019
(05-08-2026, 10:19 PM)Smitty Wrote: The Rockets could get “aggressive” to acquire Donovan Mitchell if he’s available this summer, per @BannedMacMahon
“They’ve got assets… If Donovan Mitchell’s available, that is a guy I could see the Rockets being aggressive to go get.”
(h/t @SleeperRockets)
If he fails again to get to the conference finals, everything could be on the table. Coaching and management included. They're in a 0-2 hole.
Posts: 1,238
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 718 in 374 posts
Likes Given: 420
Likes Received: 718 in 374 posts
Likes Given: 420
Joined: Oct 2020
Ajay Mitchell will be a UFA in 2028. Just saying.
I'm sure Presti will find a way to avoid losing him for nothing, but the cost of that roster is going through the roof.
|