02-15-2024, 01:11 PM
(02-15-2024, 12:28 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: I am talking about things like DFG% compared to his block numbers. 5blk in a game. One would think that he is an elite rim protector. But his DFG% around the rim is average for a big. Add a below average DFG% outside the paint. Especially from 3 and the defensive impact probably isn't as high as blks+reb indicate.
That goes along with the +/-. Mavs are winning but looking at the lineup data Gafford's minutes have been among the worst. Looking at the first five games of the winnning streak Maxi lead the team in +/-. Yesterday it was Lively.
That's not Gafford bashing. Just factual information. What people do with it is up to them. For me it indicates that Gafford probably isn't as good as the boxscore suggests.
Doesn't mean that I am completly out on him. He is the big bruiser type that can give them 10-20 minutes per game depending on the matchup. Instead of having a fatal flaw that could be exposed the Mavs finally have a counter. I just don't think he is even in the same conversation as Lively (or even Maxi) when it comes to on court value for the Mavs.
The bottom line of all this for me is that Gafford is a great backup for Lively. I think he's so good at it that he really isn't overpaid as such.
On the BR board, there was this huge debate about whether Gafford should start over Lively. Thankfully, folks on this board are a lot smarter than that.
Man, do I love me some Dereck Lively. How many people thought he would be a majorly difference-making rookie? Many thought he would be a complete bust. Oops.