I've wondered about Wiggins for two months. Certainly seems like a Mavs-type buy-low move. One thing about Wiggins, his value is low and he's still an awesome talent.
- A wing scorer that would allow the Mavs to play small;
- Adds size on the wing and tremendous athleticism;
- Mavs transition offense is near the bottom of the league (as the DFS article in The Athletic today notes);
- Mavs have a history of rehabilitating players like Wiggins (Stackhouse)
- Do the Mavs really need another good role player? Wiggins could be so much more, especially as a secondary weapon ...
- Is Wiggins less risky than going all-in on another dynamic talent like John Wall?
- A wing scorer that would allow the Mavs to play small;
- Adds size on the wing and tremendous athleticism;
- Mavs transition offense is near the bottom of the league (as the DFS article in The Athletic today notes);
- Mavs have a history of rehabilitating players like Wiggins (Stackhouse)
- Do the Mavs really need another good role player? Wiggins could be so much more, especially as a secondary weapon ...
- Is Wiggins less risky than going all-in on another dynamic talent like John Wall?