01-17-2024, 10:46 AM
(01-17-2024, 10:42 AM)ItsGoTime Wrote: You were replying to a guy advocating for the Tate and Landale for Holmes trade. In that trade the writer says perhaps a SRP or 2. In that case, the asset would be added determined by Tate’s worth, not because of Holmes.
I was replying specifically to the statement that we "need to get off Holmes contract". I'm simply arguing that I don't believe its necessary to do that now. I would argue that the asset cost would be at least as much about taking on Holmes as Tate's worth, but my reply was specifically to that statement. I should probably have bolded it.