01-17-2024, 10:42 AM
(01-17-2024, 10:36 AM)mvossman Wrote: Just to clarify, I argued that it was not necessary to get off him now, that I thought it would likely cost an asset to do so, and that I would not want to pay that asset now. If they manage to get from under that contract without paying anything, then more power to them.You were replying to a guy advocating for the Tate and Landale for Holmes trade. In that trade the writer says perhaps a SRP or 2. In that case, the asset would be added determined by Tate’s worth, not because of Holmes.