12-20-2023, 04:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2023, 04:39 PM by MarkAguirreWrathofGod.)
(12-20-2023, 03:46 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: The proposal I made did not have any picks attached, leaving it up to the reader to finish out the remainder of the compensation. Dan and I agreed that WE would be willing to give up the 27, before that conversation though I said 2 SRPs would be too little, but maybe 1 or 2 pick swaps does it.
Like I said, you guys go CRAZY once the 27 is a glimmer of a thought. It’s mine, my precious.
Why is it going CRAZY to say you wouldn’t trade the pick for Stewart? There are some people that would, and some who wouldn’t. For me, it would depend on the parameters (what protections on the pick, what salary and how much we are dumping) but I would lean towards “no.” Essentially because I want us to save assets for the elusive 3rd best player— preferably a big wing aka our very own Aaron Gordon. And I’d like to keep Omax (especially) and Green while doing that, if possible.
It’s not a non-starter for me to deal the ‘27. And I like Stewart. But would probably want someone more skilled to include ‘27, unless the protections were quite favorable or the savings created allowed for more maneuvering. Or some combination of both.