11-10-2023, 07:50 PM
(11-10-2023, 06:20 PM)MarkAguirreWrathofGod Wrote: I agree with you it’s a better thought out deal than most. Claxton is an UFA though. And DFS seems to be declining. Even if we could re-sign Claxton, it would cost close to 20m per year and then you almost have to start him over Lively. Which would suck for Lively and be super awkward.I don’t understand why letting Lively develop more off the bench is such a bad thing? IF he proves to be a better player than Claxton, isn’t that an amazing problem to have?