08-17-2023, 02:04 PM
(08-17-2023, 01:36 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: Well, I think by going with historical cost Holmes is worth a negative FRP (we got OMax by taking on Holmes). Any inclusion of Holmes in a trade proposal would have to include a FRP just to equal out his negative worth.
Its been pointed out multiple times to you how that is not the way to look at his value. That first was for taking on his entire salary, which is different than using him as a salary match fodder as in all proposed trades involving him. Just like its also not reasonable to compare a late round first pick during the draft to an unprotected first years away. I think I am going to join the block party as well, otherwise I am contributing too much to the noise.