(07-20-2023, 11:34 PM)cow Wrote: Except I didn't say this. Read next time.
Yeah you did. Read what YOU said (and read what YOU responded to) the next time.
A trade was suggested in which the Mavs give up 1sr R Pick (of which they only have 1) as part of the outgoing, as was McGee. Post 5374.
I replied with the idea I would love to see McGee traded, but no interest in a trade with the Mavs only 1st outgoing [and more picks were mentioned too], even if McGee is outbound.
YOU chose to object, and say that you HAVE TO pay something to get rid of McGee (you made it a point to say "McGee's contract might require a FRP ..."), so ....
And I responded I wasn't interested. (" Not interested in the least. He can be trade filler. He can be parked on the bench. Maybe be of help in practices. I see no reason to use draft capital too, in addition to paying him, and I think the media assertions that he is definitely gone are misguided (either by over-assuming media, or by short-sighted front office people, if there's not a trade coming where he will be filler). It would NOT surprise me if he actually ends up going nowhere, despite what we are being told by media.")
YOU countered again, upping your argument by adding that "getting off of McGee's contract inexpensively is just a dream."
And again, I said I'm still not interested in such a deal -- don't have any real need to move McGee, and certainly not at that sort of price where Dallas' 1st is being mentioned.
That was my point all along. It never changed. You started in arguing with me. And kept on arguing. My point never changed.