04-15-2023, 07:18 PM
I think Turner could be had for #10. Two years left on his contract is the perfect time to deal him. If the Pacers wait until the trade deadline or until he's an expiring the offers will drop off significantly.
Should Dallas pay that much? I wouldn't hate the move, but Turner doesn't solve their rebounding problems. I think the Mavs are better off spending their best asset on a wing, whether in a trade or taking someone in the draft, and looking for a more affordable center.
I'd prefer something like Bullock + 27 1st for Gafford. Not sure that Washington would go for that deal directly so you might need to find a 3rd team or hope they have interest in a Wood S&T.
I don't see Reed going anywhere. He's restricted and the Mavs don't have the ability to outbid the Sixers.
Should Dallas pay that much? I wouldn't hate the move, but Turner doesn't solve their rebounding problems. I think the Mavs are better off spending their best asset on a wing, whether in a trade or taking someone in the draft, and looking for a more affordable center.
I'd prefer something like Bullock + 27 1st for Gafford. Not sure that Washington would go for that deal directly so you might need to find a 3rd team or hope they have interest in a Wood S&T.
I don't see Reed going anywhere. He's restricted and the Mavs don't have the ability to outbid the Sixers.