(02-06-2020, 04:38 PM)fifteenth Wrote:(02-06-2020, 04:31 PM)Baller AI Wrote: You do realize he won a ring with the Warriors as their 4th best player in a 3D role? He was our best player when he was taking more shots because we were literally tanking. But on this team he would be moved back to his ideal role, 3D player. It's not rocket science lol. I agree we should have traded him IF we were going to use the TPE and trade Lee. But for whatever reason, I can't even begin to guess what that is, we did not trade Lee and wasted the TPE.
We didn't pay Barnes to be a 3&D player, LOL. He no longer sees himself as that. That actually matters. And I'll say it again, though you guys couldn't care less, the fact that no trade materialized does not make gathering the ammunition wrong.
Go find hakeemfan's last post and read it. Maybe he'll make more sense to you that I do.
Illogical. Luka is paid less than KP, does that make KP our best player? Luka is paid less than THJ, does that make THJ the primary playmaker and go to guy? Use some common sense. Harrison Barnes in a 3D role is exactly what this team needs. Yes trading him was a good call, but only if we completed the plan by trading Lee's expiring contract and using the TPE to absorb salary back. We did not do this, making the trade for Lee completely pointless. Are you familiar with the term "opportunity cost"? Look it up, and you will understand the opportunity cost of trading Barnes for Justin Jackson and not using the TPE and LEe's expiring.