DRAFT: #18 [Green] & #31 [Terry] & trade for #36 [Tyler Bey]

[Dundalis]

This is my last reply on this particular issue:

I think you are dead wrong about TBey. He was listed as a GUARD in college and is listed as a G/F or wing in mock drafts. He is NOT a "big."

Reed on the other hand is MUCH more of a big, a F/C.

I understand your view on the subject, I just flatly disagree. I didn't think my post warranted a reply, as we've discussed this already. Not sure why you wrote this.

I think that the need for a defensive "wing" could be met by a "four wing," which could involve a "big man" who can hit a three and successfully defend the perimeter. I think such a player would fit in the starting lineup much better than Powell would given KP's flourishing in what used to be Powell's role. I have said many times that the Mavs need another creator next to Luka (more than anything else, including that defensive wing), but I don't expect that guy to be available in the draft (unless we trade up for Haliburton, perhaps?), so I'm fine with Achiuwa, Reed, Tiger, Smith, et al.

Tyler Bey is a SF/PF, while Achiuwa, Reed and Smith are PF/C. I´m fine with taking one of them at #31, but at #18 such projected low-ceiling players would be disappointing. Of course if Achiuwa turns into Bam I always knew.

What do you expect to get at 18? I think if the Mavs keep their pick, when they have such a significant need to upgrade their roster, they should think in terms of the highest floor possible. They need someone who can be part of the rotation right away (even with some learning curve/growing pains), because our current rotation is Luka, KP, doesn't-really-fit-because-defense-and-creation THJ, can-be-your-fifth-best-starter DFS, and a bunch of bench players.

BTW, I consider T. Bey a clear-cut four.

What? I have no idea why people are stuck in win now mode. This team has one of the longest open windows in the league. The idea that we absolutely have to upgrade the roster to be in a spot of contention next season has no basis in the reality of the team. IMO that's just an emotional short term gratification fan response. Acquire assets so we can build over the next 2-3, even 4 seasons. This team is garbage at acquiring valuable trade assets (young players with upside and draft picks), and being in win now mode for so long is only a partial excuse, because other teams have done way better at it while also being winning teams. Not every player we bring in HAS to be able to fit seemlessly into the team, you can bring players or picks in because they are or will become valuable trade assets that you can then upgrade again later, or use in big trade moves. That's how good teams go about roster building (at least the teams that aren't FA destinations that can always attract the best FA's). So many of the up and coming teams have built rosters with way better tradeable assets than the Mavs, which you want, if you want to be able to manouver yourself into position to make trades for high level talent that becomes available (since that's our one area of strength as we have never proven a FA destination). When Dirk is at the back end of his relative prime between the age of about 30-35, it makes a bit more sense, but not now and not for a number of years. You can make all the excuses about why that's the case, but for me it starts at how garbage this team has treated the draft. Plenty of teams have done far better jobs at it than we have without having constantly great draft position. If you can bring in imediate help, great, but do it through trades or FA. This team almost always goes with supposed high floor type players with non lottery picks in the first round of the draft, and it almost never works out. We have what is effectively two low end first round picks. I'm not even saying Bey would necessarily be a bad pick (certainly not at 31), but let's not make the same dumb draft mistakes we've made in the past by purposefully not picking BPA.

---

12 Kings - 12, 35, 43, 52

THJ+Wright+18+31 for Buddy+12+43? 

Who says no? 

I'm never getting off the Buddy train.

Would do that in a heatbeat. With the way the Mavs system seems to elevate shooters the way we do, Hield would probably shoot 45% like Curry just did here, but on super high volume. The kind of offensive warping affect that would have with the likes of Luka and KP around would be insane, and more than offset the defensive issues. You draft BPA at 12, and focus on acquiring a wing defensive specialist in FA or trade for the other starter spot, with much less need for offensive production from that position. Kings would have to be mad to do it though, Hield surely would attract better offers with his shooting ability, despite the down year.