01-18-2021, 05:36 PM
(01-17-2021, 08:05 PM)Dahlsim Wrote: Similar to the supreme court, evidence was actually not examined pretty much across the board.
Cases were dismissed and not taken to trial for various reasons having nothing to do with alleged evidence much of which would require trials to investigate.
Without trials, public trials and investigation, how could anything at all definitive be said about evidence?
Judges hear evidence in hearings before trials take place in order to determine if there is a case to be tried. These cases never made it to trial because there was not enough evidence to justify even having a case.