Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lineup Discussion: Good on Paper Vs Good on Court
#1
[Image: EisRcrxXYAEXkmY?format=png&name=large]


This is his explanation:


Quote:Here's what I did:
>Plug in a team's most-used lineup
(AB/Green/LeBron/AD/McGee)
>Find avg net rating for its 50 comps
(-1.1 pts per 100 poss)
>Repeat for the next 9 most-used lineups
(-2.7, +9.2, -0.4, +1.4, -4.5, +7.3, +3.5, +2.4, +8.0)
>Avg ratings weighted by poss
(+0.7)

Here is his article on his lineup similarity app:

https://fansided.com/2020/09/16/nylon-ca...mparisons/


Here is the app:

https://crumpledpaperjumper.shinyapps.io...eupFinder/

He classifies all players by three skills:

1) Floor Spacing
2) Offensive Creation
3) Rim Protection

[Image: 02-Similar-Lineup-Finder-sorted-by-load-and-3PA.jpg]
[Image: 03-Similar-Lineup-Finder-sorted-by-load-...ection.jpg]
[Image: 04-Similar-Lineup-Finder-sorted-by-3PA-a...ection.jpg]
[Image: 05-Similar-Lineup-Finder-3d-skills-chart.jpg]

[Image: 06-Similar-Lineup-Finder-PHI-DEN-lineup-...son-3d.jpg]

So Todd Whitehead put this together and asks this question:


Quote:The Lakers (and Mavs) are succeeding with player-archetype combinations that don't work for other teams. Would they be even BETTER with more optimized fit? Or are their players just unique?


What do you think?
Like Reply


Messages In This Thread
Lineup Discussion: Good on Paper Vs Good on Court - by Kammrath - 09-24-2020, 02:08 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)