06-16-2021, 10:52 PM
(06-16-2021, 10:17 PM)Kammrath Wrote: I am just suggesting that analytics (if heavily leaned on) TEND to offer a more predictable and long term hit rate than things like human observance and intuition. Ainge was a GENIUS for a number of years and now is just a guy without a job. Ainge was on a roll that made him look like he had this huge leg up on everyone, but over time he was shown to not be that special of a GM.
I do not think a successful GM has to be an analytics guy, but I think the probability of being a successful GM goes up if you are an analytics guy.
Just want to throw my hat in the ring and say I think Ainge is still a good GM despite Boston not winning a championship recently.
Thank you Donnie.