09-20-2020, 02:26 PM
(09-20-2020, 11:09 AM)aguiar95 Wrote:(09-20-2020, 10:10 AM)Mapka Wrote: Does anybody else see Vassel being in danger to be the biggest "underachiever" in this draft.
He is raising the boards high above where he should be picked, because he seems to fit the 3&D wing mold everyone is looking for.
I can see him be very good if he is set between a competent PG and a playmaking SF. But otherwise he will be asked to do to much and might crumble.
Especially if he is drafted at the 8th spot xD.
By the way just 3&D seems really overrated to me in a wing. Without another offensive skill this seems pretty uninspireing.
Teams drafting him have to know he has a low ceiling. He'll never be a 2nd/3rd option. But if you already have a 1st/2nd option, he'll be a hell of a good complimentary piece.
(09-20-2020, 10:46 AM)omahen Wrote:(09-20-2020, 10:10 AM)Mapka Wrote: Does anybody else see Vassel being in danger to be the biggest "underachiever" in this draft.
I think that might happen to all four glorified 3-D potentials: Vassell, Williams, Nesmith and Bey.
Agree on Williams/Nesmith, disagree on Bey/Vassell.
Reading the fansides you normally get a good feeling how a draft unfolds.
And right now I see a dynamic that Vassel will not be picked for his good fit, or for being bpa but for having the highest "value". To me he seems to be to dependend on playmaking around him to surge in this situation.
Williams is a ? with potential.
I think Nesmith will stick for his shooting. And what I heard about Bey, he is more of an all-around-player who shouldn't have problems to find a way to contribute.