03-08-2020, 08:13 PM
(03-08-2020, 08:03 PM)hakeemfan Wrote:(03-08-2020, 07:35 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: hakeemfan
I don’t know how Bron’s fade-away shots off his post ups are being classified. Maybe that’s not counted as a midrange game. I know his post ups late in games where he gets much better shots are not classified as mid range shots.
If Luka were doing any of those things well I would not be asking him to change a thing.
You have been going for a few years now on how it is better to shoot a certain percentage from3 as opposed to a higher percentage from 2. That might be good for 3 quarters. In the clutch, teams that win know how to get better shots. Throw GS out of that conversation with 3 generational shooters on the court together.
Teams that rely on their leader shooting a high volume poor 3 pt percentage will have a ceiling on their growth unless that leader changes his game to add an element that he currently does not have.
Because it is the truth. 33% from 3 equals 50% from 2. That´s a fact. To quote Mark Cuban. You are just talking generalities.
"In the clutch teams that win know how to get better shots." What is a better shot? Best possible shot is a dunk/layup or FT. Followed by corner 3s. Midrange shots are way down the list. I want the Mavs to take the best possible shot. Obviously a different story if you are talking about a single possession.
GS is a bad example because the actually had a high midrange volume in recent years.
I don´t want Luka to rely on a high volume from 3. I want him to have the highest possible volume in the paint.