MKG

[fifteenth]

I am just stating my opinion. Why is it a problem for you if it is different than yours?

LOL, you are quite confusing. It's not a problem for me. I don't really understand what you're trying to say. 

If a line-up is positive offensively it doesn't mean that another line-up wouldn't be even better. 

I haven't seen anything contrary to this in this thread. The point of trying to find an offensive role for someone like MKG would be to attempt to create a lineup with improved defense without giving up too much offense. 

You watching 20 minutes of MKG play live is supposed to be a proof that he is a defensive beast. Me watching MKG play 20 minutes of offense is a small sample and doesn't mean anything. Don't you think this is a little offensive towards me? Not even pointing out that it was you who decided that all my MKG knowledge comes from watching him 30 minutes for the Mavs.

I think we may have a language barrier in play here. I didn't say ANY of these things. I never said that my live viewing PROVED anything. I simply reported what I saw. Also, I didn't say that you opinion was meaningless! I said that YOU essentially said that MKG's defense doesn't matter. Gargantuan meaning in difference there. Lastly, I didn't say your knowledge of MKG is based on watching him for 30 minutes, I said that you're conclusion about MKG's offensive fit with the Mavs is based on the exactly 30 minutes that he's played with the Mavs. In other words, I was suggesting that it would take more time with the Mavs for us to find out if Rick can find a role for MKG. 

I argue in support of mine. So, where is the problem?

I have never claimed you shouldn't argue your points. It's just that when I reply you conclude that I have a problem with you. 

Sorry for calling your arguments in favour of MKG hype.

Thanks

---

@"omahen", I seem to have these exact some kinds of exchanges with Psych. Maybe we have a similar language barrier in play. Either that or I'm just a flawed communicator.