06-25-2026, 05:44 PM
(06-25-2026, 05:18 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Agreed, and I'm guilty. I reacted in real time without taking a second to properly absorb the "money disappearing for nothing" aspect of it. All things considered, I'd say DET coming out 3 SRPs to the better kind of indicates a massive value, honestly.
...but, I also think Stewart is a more desirable player than Gafford, so there's that.
It's clearly not an apples to apples situation with Gafford vs Stewart but if it does turn out that Gafford is viewed as a negative contract across the league we may end up finding out that we can't really count on good basketball assets coming back and instead a bunch of additional bad contracts being offered instead. There is a very real reality where the best we can do is just have someone clear the books for us in exchange for an SRP or two and I think it's fair to brace for that potential reality.
Up until a couple days ago I had been on the side of "the Mavs have a much stronger asset collection than given credit for" side of the fence but it was under the assumption that guys like PJ and Gafford and even Klay to a lesser extent could bring us back assets (potentially even young players that we can try to develop). After the activity across the league, especially the lack thereof during the draft, I'm not so sure anymore. Everyone keeps saying vets didn't get moved because of how deep the class was when I'm worried it might be because these ~$20M rotation players are just really undesirable in this second apron era, even if the players are decent. The next month will be very interesting to see what the truth is there.

