06-20-2026, 09:36 PM
I'm probably one of the very tiny minority in here who likes Nate Ament.
I mellowed down a bit on him and now I have the guards above him (except for Burries).
For me, Burries would be a PG-study who won't be a PG after all things are said and done.
Mavs would get another PG in the next 2 years regardless if its Ament or Burries as the pick.
Burries plays 1 and 2, Nate plays 2 and 3. But as an SG? I'd take Ament.
Burries would have a better impact on year 1, and probably would be a constant with incremental improvements.
With Ament? year 1 would probably be "pull-yer-hair" type of play, but year 2? I expect him to better than Burries.
I mellowed down a bit on him and now I have the guards above him (except for Burries).
For me, Burries would be a PG-study who won't be a PG after all things are said and done.
Mavs would get another PG in the next 2 years regardless if its Ament or Burries as the pick.
Burries plays 1 and 2, Nate plays 2 and 3. But as an SG? I'd take Ament.
Burries would have a better impact on year 1, and probably would be a constant with incremental improvements.
With Ament? year 1 would probably be "pull-yer-hair" type of play, but year 2? I expect him to better than Burries.