1 hour ago
Not a fan of Burries, but if all the other guards are taken, I'd be okay with him at 9.
Not excited, just okay-ish.
The thing that worries me is if the Mavs are presented with a choice of Burries and Flemmings and the Mavs went with Burries.
Not the end of the world type of disappointment, but still would be.
From all of what I have seen and heard of Flemmings is that this dude is cerebral, and you'd need that in a PG.
And in this draft, I'd like to walk away with a better PG than hoping for a good SG who can one day share PG duties.
Not excited, just okay-ish.
The thing that worries me is if the Mavs are presented with a choice of Burries and Flemmings and the Mavs went with Burries.
Not the end of the world type of disappointment, but still would be.
From all of what I have seen and heard of Flemmings is that this dude is cerebral, and you'd need that in a PG.
And in this draft, I'd like to walk away with a better PG than hoping for a good SG who can one day share PG duties.
![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)