05-28-2026, 02:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2026, 02:41 PM by RasheedsBigWhiteSpot.)
(05-28-2026, 02:02 PM)mvossman Wrote: Holland is a forward, a better defender, three years younger and less than half the cost of Kuminga. Neither of them can shoot (although Holland is particularly bad). I also worry Kuminga has some attitude issues. If I were going to take a flyer on one of them, it would probably be Holland due to age and contract. I do like Risacher better than both.
I think the one v. one comp is Holland vs. Risacher (considering they were both from 2024 and are, essentially, the same age), not Holland vs. Kuminga.
Edit: At the end of the day, the basic root of basketball is putting the ball in the basket. In other words, if you can't really do that, you really have to be pretty bad ass at other things. I just don't see that with Holland to see him like a McDaniels or, a Robert Covington.

