At 8 or 9, the Mavs choice could be having to pick from among leftovers that aren't that enticing.
Ament - To me, he's too much "projection" (he looks like a player should look like, long and agile) and not enough of a guy who is getting there. His (imagined) upside isn't any more special than those who are farther along and making more progress, and in most cases it's lower (because he has to make more future progress than they do, just to catch up).
Okorie - I'm not interested. I see him as a very small SG (he is not really a PG in game style or in AST%) who brings all the issues of a small player, and does NOT have a plus ability to make 3s.
The best solution? The NBA needs to ping-pong the Mavs into the top 4, which solves the problem of having iffy players to pick from. I vote for that.
Ament - To me, he's too much "projection" (he looks like a player should look like, long and agile) and not enough of a guy who is getting there. His (imagined) upside isn't any more special than those who are farther along and making more progress, and in most cases it's lower (because he has to make more future progress than they do, just to catch up).
Okorie - I'm not interested. I see him as a very small SG (he is not really a PG in game style or in AST%) who brings all the issues of a small player, and does NOT have a plus ability to make 3s.
The best solution? The NBA needs to ping-pong the Mavs into the top 4, which solves the problem of having iffy players to pick from. I vote for that.
![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)