(01-05-2026, 05:06 PM)Smitty Wrote: CJ would likely go to Dallas in this deal, if we're looping in AD? This works on the trade machine, but I'm sure there are plenty of other ways to go...
Hawks: Davis, Martin
Wizards: Young
Mavs: McCollum (expiring), Coulibaly, Risacher, Pick(s)
(01-05-2026, 05:41 PM)F Gump Wrote: That set of players to Dallas is so meh, and DAL taking back more players than they send causes a big issue (Mavs are already needing more open spots).
The deal would have to include NO pick and another FRP. Else, why bother? I think I'd rather keep AD, and work to maximize the Mavs pick.
I don't disagree necessarily, but I've been pretty consistent that I expect AD's value to land around [Expiring + Young Player(s) + Pick(s)]. The discussion for me lies with who those players are and how good the perceived value of the pick(s) package is. I posted that fantasy trade minutes after the Stein tweet. It meets the requirement for what I believe AD to be "worth", but it was my first attempt, and I was just making a legal trade that could make sense.
Since then, I've thought it through some and found something that seems to be good from all 3 sides.
Hawks: Davis, Naji, DLO
Wizards: Young, Martin
Mavs: McCollum, Kispert, Risacher, Newell, Pick(s)
The Hawks stay just under the tax, which we know is a requirement in all of this. With this move the Mavs actually avoid the tax entirely this season, which is where a tanking team should be. I guess for me the argument is do I think the Mavs will be good next year with those young guys and draft picks added to Year 2 Cooper Flagg? Meh. Kispert is a good 3PT shooter, which Flagg needs more of around him. Risacher is the #1 overall pick from last year that seems to be slumping a bit his sophomore season. Newell is intriguing and has ties to Coop already but is an unknown rookie FRP. The draft pick selection(s) will be unknown(s) also. All of it is underwhelming but this is the bed they made...



![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)