01-18-2020, 08:21 AM
I really wonder what rulebook these refs are using ... 3 reviews, 3 times wrong. I can understand getting a call wrong in the flow of the game, but on a review they have to get the calls right.
Although i think they were wrong on the fllagrant call on Luka vs. Whiteside and the non-flagrant on Whiteside vs. Kleber, i can live with that as "excessive contact" is a judgement call. But the last one (non-foul Whiteside on THJ) is just terrible and there's no way to call it this way in the game of basketball. THJ jumps into clear space, Whiteside comes from the side, moving into THJ and there's contact on the boady and then the arm. Yet they look at it for a minute and decide non-foul, WTF?
Although i think they were wrong on the fllagrant call on Luka vs. Whiteside and the non-flagrant on Whiteside vs. Kleber, i can live with that as "excessive contact" is a judgement call. But the last one (non-foul Whiteside on THJ) is just terrible and there's no way to call it this way in the game of basketball. THJ jumps into clear space, Whiteside comes from the side, moving into THJ and there's contact on the boady and then the arm. Yet they look at it for a minute and decide non-foul, WTF?