01-31-2023, 01:59 PM
(01-31-2023, 01:53 PM)omahen Wrote: I think they are close in value. DFS is a decent defender, but not really elite. Vando is similar in that regard. DFS is a better 3 point shooter on a much higher volume, Vando operates closer to the basket. DFS is more expensive but cost controlled for what should be his good years. Vando is younger and cost controlled for another season.
I just think we, as fans and in an over-arching general sense, tend to overvalue youth and potential, while the professionals who have to deal with these guys every day tend to overvalue experience, professionalism and good habits.
I wouldn't be surprised if DFS is very well thought of around the league and worth quite a bit to the right team. I think the weirdness here is about our collective wondering about why Utah would be interested in such a player.