Is the disagreement here about symantics, or no?
ML's point, if I can be so bold as to speculate on that, is that a team can get outscored while playing well, and can outscore it's oponent while playing poorly. Therefore, the numbers only tell you who scored the most, not how they performed.
It looks like Kam is possibly saying that "outscoring your oponnent", or not, suggests something about your performance often enough that it should be looked at, even though it doesn't give you the details about why you outscored or got outscored.
Is there a place to land between those two takes? Or is it a "never the twain shall meet" situation?
ML's point, if I can be so bold as to speculate on that, is that a team can get outscored while playing well, and can outscore it's oponent while playing poorly. Therefore, the numbers only tell you who scored the most, not how they performed.
It looks like Kam is possibly saying that "outscoring your oponnent", or not, suggests something about your performance often enough that it should be looked at, even though it doesn't give you the details about why you outscored or got outscored.
Is there a place to land between those two takes? Or is it a "never the twain shall meet" situation?
![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)