Posts: 8,564
Threads: 12
Likes Received: 4,643 in 2,473 posts
Likes Given: 1,244
Likes Received: 4,643 in 2,473 posts
Likes Given: 1,244
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-05-2023, 12:55 PM)Jakeospikez Wrote: I don't think most people see JJJ even at the extreme ceiling outcome. JJJ is 6'10/7'4ws and over 240lbs. Hendricks is not even close to that. Most comps are like current Jerami Grant. Maybe a decent ceiling comp is Jerami Grant mixed with some John Collins. Developing to current Jerami Grant really fast isn't bad though considering it took Jerami Grant himself many years to get to this point.
Difficult to find a better comparisation than JJJ. Collins had no 3-point range in college and was a way better finisher in the paint. Grant has never been a rim protector/shot blocker. A few posts mentioned a more athletic version of Kleber. Personally I think that´s the best one.
Posts: 321
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 214 in 115 posts
Likes Given: 28
Likes Received: 214 in 115 posts
Likes Given: 28
Joined: Jun 2021
06-05-2023, 01:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2023, 01:30 PM by Jakeospikez.)
(06-05-2023, 01:03 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Difficult to find a better comparisation than JJJ. Collins had no 3-point range in college and was a way better finisher in the paint. Grant has never been a rim protector/shot blocker. A few posts mentioned a more athletic version of Kleber. Personally I think that´s the best one.
I was trying to go off of current NBA Grant/Collins as the ceiling with Collins being more of an offensive role comp. More athletic version of Kleber seems decent enough. Kleber is 240lbs too though. Is Hendricks gonna bulk up to 240? Idk about the JJJ comparison at all though. JJJ 3 blocks/g in 21 mins in college. Hendricks 1.7 blocks/g in 34.7mins. JJJ 5.5 blocks/40 mins, Hendricks 2 blocks/40mins. If Hendricks can crack 1.5-2 blocks/g in the NBA from the 4 position then he's gonna be an elite supporting rim protector. Does he have the build to play 5? Maybe for the Mavericks and that's about it. Actually the best ceiling I can think of is Jarred Vanderbilt with a 3pt shot or maybe Jonathan Isaac with a better shot?
Posts: 7,825
Threads: 72
Likes Received: 1,767 in 1,223 posts
Likes Given: 2,772
Likes Received: 1,767 in 1,223 posts
Likes Given: 2,772
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-05-2023, 01:25 PM)Jakeospikez Wrote: I was trying to go off of current NBA Grant/Collins as the ceiling with Collins being more of an offensive role comp. More athletic version of Kleber seems decent enough. Kleber is 240lbs too though. Is Hendricks gonna bulk up to 240? Idk about the JJJ comparison at all though. JJJ 3 blocks/g in 21 mins in college. Hendricks 1.7 blocks/g in 34.7mins. JJJ 5.5 blocks/40 mins, Hendricks 2 blocks/40mins. If Hendricks can crack 1.5-2 blocks/g in the NBA from the 4 position then he's gonna be an elite supporting rim protector. Does he have the build to play 5? Maybe for the Mavericks and that's about it. Actually the best ceiling I can think of is Jarred Vanderbilt with a 3pt shot or maybe Jonathan Isaac with a better shot? Jonathan Isaac with a better shot is pretty much JJJ.
Posts: 4,670
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Joined: Sep 2019
Rafael Barlowe in his latest Pod says Utah at #9 may have an interest in taking Coulibaly. Common wisdom says they want a PG, but the thinking is there will be a PG still there at #16.
That might push Black or Ausar Thompson back to 10.
Posts: 10,474
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,029 in 3,408 posts
Likes Given: 352
Likes Received: 6,029 in 3,408 posts
Likes Given: 352
Joined: Oct 2020
06-05-2023, 07:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2023, 07:50 PM by Chicagojk.)
(06-05-2023, 07:00 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Rafael Barlowe in his latest Pod says Utah at #9 may have an interest in taking Coulibaly. Common wisdom says they want a PG, but the thinking is there will be a PG still there at #16.
That might push Black or Ausar Thompson back to 10.
Thoughts on Ausar?
Probably nothing but he did work out for the Wizards yesterday.
https://twitter.com/BTRowland/status/166...5628681218
Posts: 10,474
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,029 in 3,408 posts
Likes Given: 352
Likes Received: 6,029 in 3,408 posts
Likes Given: 352
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,080
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,269 in 730 posts
Likes Given: 3,419
Likes Received: 1,269 in 730 posts
Likes Given: 3,419
Joined: Mar 2020
(06-05-2023, 08:16 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CtHoVcBu_...ODBiNWFlZA==
Hmm....
Didn't Mr. Bilas attend Duke?
I guess I'm questioning his objectivity...
Posts: 6,104
Threads: 10
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Joined: Feb 2021
(06-05-2023, 07:50 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Thoughts on Ausar?
Probably nothing but he did work out for the Wizards yesterday.
https://twitter.com/BTRowland/status/166...5628681218
I always felt that the Wizards were a likely landing spot for Wallace and that might determine whether one or two of Black, Hendricks and Walker fall to the Mavs. They need a (defensive-minded) PG next to Beal, but SF would also be an option. If they go with a big line-up of
Beal
Kuzma
Porzingis
Gafford
then I´d say Wallace is a natural pick. Schlenk might also have enough of midget PGs that can´t defend.
Ausar Thompson might fall, if the Magic don´t take him at #6. Maybe Utah would consider him at #9, too.
I still say odds are heavily in Mavs favour that one of Black, Hendricks and Walker will be available at #10, especially since Ainge is not afraid to reach for his guy.
Posts: 5,426
Threads: 26
Likes Received: 1,703 in 942 posts
Likes Given: 5,678
Likes Received: 1,703 in 942 posts
Likes Given: 5,678
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-05-2023, 10:55 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: I always felt that the Wizards were a likely landing spot for Wallace and that might determine whether one or two of Black, Hendricks and Walker fall to the Mavs. They need a (defensive-minded) PG next to Beal, but SF would also be an option. If they go with a big line-up of
Beal
Kuzma
Porzingis
Gafford
then I´d say Wallace is a natural pick. Schlenk might also have enough of midget PGs that can´t defend.
Ausar Thompson might fall, if the Magic don´t take him at #6. Maybe Utah would consider him at #9, too.
I still say odds are heavily in Mavs favour that one of Black, Hendricks and Walker will be available at #10, especially since Ainge is not afraid to reach for his guy.
Awwww, that's so cute that you think we aren't trading the pick (hopefully just down) for fool's good.
Posts: 4,670
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-04-2023, 05:59 PM)IamDougieFresh Wrote: My favorite source for scouting videos is releasing his Coulibaly video at 11pm.
Spins had Hardy as a Top Six guy in last year's draft. Thought everyone might want a little positivity to start their day...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhkQ0-pS02k
Posts: 4,670
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-05-2023, 10:55 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: I always felt that the Wizards were a likely landing spot for Wallace and that might determine whether one or two of Black, Hendricks and Walker fall to the Mavs. They need a (defensive-minded) PG next to Beal, but SF would also be an option. If they go with a big line-up of
Beal
Kuzma
Porzingis
Gafford
then I´d say Wallace is a natural pick. Schlenk might also have enough of midget PGs that can´t defend.
Ausar Thompson might fall, if the Magic don´t take him at #6. Maybe Utah would consider him at #9, too.
I still say odds are heavily in Mavs favour that one of Black, Hendricks and Walker will be available at #10, especially since Ainge is not afraid to reach for his guy.
There was talk yesterday of Coulibaly going as high as nine.
It makes sense for Orlando to either go Black or the lesser Thompson. I think two of the PF's go to Detroit (probably Whitmore) and Indy. So, the way I might put it (if Utah reaches and Wallace goes to Washington) is Dallas would have a shot at the lesser of Hendricks/Walker and the lesser of Thompson/Black. Utah could use any of those guys, so if they don't reach then it is likely one of those four is left at #10.
Posts: 1,062
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 227 in 138 posts
Likes Given: 721
Likes Received: 227 in 138 posts
Likes Given: 721
Joined: Oct 2019
(06-04-2023, 05:59 PM)IamDougieFresh Wrote: My favorite source for scouting videos is releasing his Coulibaly video at 11pm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTgTyA04dWg
Watching it, I am really worried about this one.
Looks like a guy with all athletic tools, but doesn't have a single reliable way to score in the next level.
Not a fan of those tbh.
Posts: 6,104
Threads: 10
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Joined: Feb 2021
(06-06-2023, 08:27 AM)khaled1987 Wrote: Watching it, I am really worried about this one.
Looks like a guy with all athletic tools, but doesn't have a single reliable way to score in the next level.
Not a fan of those tbh. Yeah could easily be the next Frankie Smokes. That´s a pick you make, when you are loaded with picks and can afford a miss. As usual we cannot.
Posts: 4,670
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Joined: Sep 2019
TE's available for teams we might trade down with:
OKC (12) 10,183,800
ATL (15) 6,292,440
UTH (16) 9,614,379
8,800,000
6,745,122
HOU (20) Cap Space
BRK (21/22) 18,131,146
Brooklyn is the only team with a TE big enough to absorb Bertans, but they won't because they have tax issues of their own.
Atlanta has even worse cap issues than Brooklyn, so isn't likely to use their TE
OKC could absorb and keep Reggie if they wanted.
Everyone else could take on McGee, or Reggie's guarantee (rather than us using the S/W). The best trade down candidates are Utah and OKC based on cap space still available after taking on salary. If we employ this strategy, as some in the media have suggested, the trick is to do this as part of a larger trade. That way it doesn't look like we gave up #10 for salary space under the apron(s).
Posts: 6,104
Threads: 10
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Joined: Feb 2021
This is a great moment to trade down to dump the contract of Bertans. After all everybody brings a present to your anniversary. And this is the 10th anniversary of trading down from Giannis to add 100k to reach Dwight Howard´s max salary. I hope they do an anime video, too.
Posts: 21
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 2 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 0
Likes Received: 2 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2019
If Dick or HENDRICKS is available at 10 I’d take one of them. If not, I’d trade down and unload Bertans or THJ
Posts: 4,670
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Likes Received: 5,392 in 1,900 posts
Likes Given: 2,549
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-07-2023, 08:10 AM)Mavs2021 Wrote: This is a great moment to trade down to dump the contract of Bertans. After all everybody brings a present to your anniversary. And this is the 10th anniversary of trading down from Giannis to add 100k to reach Dwight Howard´s max salary. I hope they do an anime video, too.
I don't expect the fan base to get the difference, but this isn't Plan Powder (if it happens). You can keep the pick and either not get more than a 10% trade spread and not get the MLE (maybe both) and probably have to S/W someone and impact your cap for years to come. These restrictions are daunting.
Or, you can find a way to sell this as an asset play that made the such-and-such trade and/or the such-and-such signing legal when it wouldn't have been otherwise. Just a few million makes a huge difference.
Posts: 6,104
Threads: 10
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Joined: Feb 2021
(06-07-2023, 08:26 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I don't expect the fan base to get the difference, but this isn't Plan Powder (if it happens). You can keep the pick and either not get more than a 10% trade spread and not get the MLE (maybe both) and probably have to S/W someone and impact your cap for years to come. These restrictions are daunting.
Or, you can find a way to sell this as an asset play that made the such-and-such trade and/or the such-and-such signing legal when it wouldn't have been otherwise. Just a few million makes a huge difference.
Also makes a difference whether you draft the next Giannis or the next Shane Larkin.
Doesn´t make much of a difference whether you spend the MLE on the next Reggie Bullock, Delon Wright or Josh Richardson, when your team is in desperate need of more high end talent. When you have no assets the only way is the draft.
The only reason to trade down is that you are 100% convinced that your BPA will be available 4-5 spots later and you can extract extra value from a trade down. Doing it to gain some short-term financial flexibility is once again atrocious short-sighted decision-making.
Posts: 1,673
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 812 in 431 posts
Likes Given: 4
Likes Received: 812 in 431 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Sep 2020
06-07-2023, 09:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2023, 09:17 AM by Jason Terry.)
(06-07-2023, 07:44 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: TE's available for teams we might trade down with:
OKC (12) 10,183,800
ATL (15) 6,292,440
UTH (16) 9,614,379
8,800,000
6,745,122
HOU (20) Cap Space
BRK (21/22) 18,131,146
Brooklyn is the only team with a TE big enough to absorb Bertans, but they won't because they have tax issues of their own.
Atlanta has even worse cap issues than Brooklyn, so isn't likely to use their TE
OKC could absorb and keep Reggie if they wanted.
Everyone else could take on McGee, or Reggie's guarantee (rather than us using the S/W). The best trade down candidates are Utah and OKC based on cap space still available after taking on salary. If we employ this strategy, as some in the media have suggested, the trick is to do this as part of a larger trade. That way it doesn't look like we gave up #10 for salary space under the apron(s). This is where I’m at as well. Utah and OKC make sense. Utah especially. There’s the front office connection there. Both of those teams could be motivated to grab the player that falls to 10. And both could facilitate a 3 team deal
On top of that, i like the idea of trading down and staying in the top 16. Leonard Miller and Lively are 2 guys that could be there around then
Any of OKC’s young players make sense to you? I feel like it would be more like 12 and a few 2nds coming back. Maybe Bullock into the TPE
Posts: 6,104
Threads: 10
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Likes Received: 2,920 in 1,685 posts
Likes Given: 959
Joined: Feb 2021
(06-07-2023, 09:16 AM)Jason Terry Wrote: This is where I’m at as well. Utah and OKC make sense. Utah especially. There’s the front office connection there. Both of those teams could be motivated to grab the player that falls to 10. And both could facilitate a 3 team deal
On top of that, i like the idea of trading down and staying in the top 16. Leonard Miller and Lively are 2 guys that could be there around then
Any of OKC’s young players make sense to you? I feel like it would be more like 12 and a few 2nds coming back. Maybe Bullock into the TPE
So you guys are advising Mark Cuban, the moron king, to facilitate trade downs with Sam Presti and Danny Ainge, two of the premium talent evaluators of the last two decades? I´d rather figure out why Presti or Ainge desperately want to trade up to #10. Who is the players they can´t wait for at #12 or #15. Then pick that guy.
|