(12-28-2020, 10:23 AM)Kammrath Wrote: So the dictionary definition of "impatient" is "restlessly eager" and I think that 100% describes the majority of this message board. This board tends to be "restlessly eager" to make roster upgrades....hence "impatient." If you choose to be offended by that, that is on you. I am just attempting to state the reality of the situation, I am not saying those with that position are "horrible people."

There is then a minority position on this board that is wanting to not take risks in roster moves unless it is for a very clear and obvious jump in talent. This is the "patient" group. 

That's it man, nothing else to see here.

(12-28-2020, 11:13 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: How in the world did the Nets lose to the Hornets? That's a problem, we play them next.

(12-28-2020, 11:43 AM)omahen Wrote: Or perhaps we avoid putting label marks on people and discuss ideas...

(12-28-2020, 09:43 AM)omahen Wrote: Either he is bad defensively (LaVine) or his durability is a concern (Oladipo). I am sure Mavs have way more information than we will ever have to (mor) acurately assess those risks. I would prefer to keep THJ if possible and make Johnson the salary filler. It is very likely we will be able to resign him at TDL anyway, if we like him so much. Hield can be an interesting option, also DeRozan. 

One thing is becoming very certain - Chicago will have a huge firesale in a couple of months (even sooner?) if they don't start performing way better.

(12-28-2020, 11:43 AM)omahen Wrote: Yeah, nothing to see, just like the "lazy armchair GMs" comment. Since it doesn't matter to you, I propose a little change of terminology. Lets call the "impatient" ones brave and the "patient" ones hesitant. I am in no way implying people with that position are "horrible". 

Or perhaps we avoid putting label marks on people and discuss ideas...

---

This actually makes me more comfortable. I would be more affraid if Charlotte came to us with the 0-3 record. Now it is just a perfect timing for them to register another loss

(12-28-2020, 10:56 AM)ClutchDirk Wrote: https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1343585027880349696

(12-28-2020, 12:28 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: Future Mav

(12-27-2020, 11:46 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Something at that high of a franchise altering level might not be completely up to him, less than two months into the job.

(12-28-2020, 10:07 AM)DanSchwartzman Wrote: Frank hitting 2/3'rds of his 3's so far this season.  It probably won't last

(12-28-2020, 10:23 AM)Kammrath Wrote: So the dictionary definition of "impatient" is "restlessly eager" and I think that 100% describes the majority of this message board.

(12-28-2020, 10:46 AM)vfromlmf Wrote: Thinking objectively about the Harden situation - and looking at what the Spurs got back for Kawhi - I'm ready to make a prediction.

Harden --> Pacers

Oladipo + Turner + pick --> Rockets

(12-28-2020, 11:13 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: How in the world did the Nets lose to the Hornets? That's a problem, we play them next.

(12-28-2020, 01:51 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: I think that describes every message board on the internet. People are results driven and in the age of instant gratification, want those results now.

Is it really that surprising that people want to make big shakeups for players that are perceived to be great so we can form a 'superteam' and stomp the league? I don't think this line of thinking is wrong. Maybe a bit pie in the sky, but I've seen crazier things happen in 2020. 

I don't think making a trade 5 games into the season is smart, but it's hard to believe the Mavs won't make a trade this year. The roster is wonky. We have 6 centers with KP/WCS/Powell/Boban/Johnson/Maxi. We have 2 shooting guards in the starting lineup with JRich and THJ. DFS is being played PF when he's definitely a wing.  

Dan pointed out in the game summary that RC's rotations are less platoon-ey to get around this weird construction. I don't think it qualifies as being impatient for recognizing deficiencies and try to correct them, and I don't think anyone here is saying to trade everyone tomorrow. If Donnie doesn't at least try to make deals at the TDL then he's not doing his job.

(12-28-2020, 01:51 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: All yall are sleeping on Portland. I called it a week ago. CJ+Collins+Simons and whatever picks for Harden+Tucker.

(12-28-2020, 02:29 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: Back to my Indiana idea ...

(12-28-2020, 02:29 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: they're already a sneaky good playoff team

(12-28-2020, 02:28 PM)fifteenth Wrote: Hey, lots of great posts lately,  SH! A few thoughts...

Folks that aren't in a rush to make an immediate trade would also like to build a dynasty.  And they'd probably cheer a sudden trade that made the Mavs better. I hope so  anyway.

Not sure about the "6 centers" thing. I've been a "1 big" proponent. But it looks like the Mavs like to play some of those guys you list with centers. Also, THJ and JRich both playing as wings is not unusual these days in the NBA. It doesn't seem too wonky to me. Also, it's been rare over the years for Rick to use platooned lineups. Staggered is more typical of his lineups.

All of that is to say, I don't see the need for a roster balancing trade. Always open to a talent increasing trade, as long as it doesn't make us worse by making us too top heavy.

(12-28-2020, 01:51 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: I think that describes every message board on the internet. People are results driven and in the age of instant gratification, want those results now.

(12-28-2020, 02:29 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: I think Harden is shipped East, for obvious reasons. 

(12-28-2020, 04:10 PM)Tyler Wrote: While his medical status is a bit of a gray area

(12-28-2020, 01:51 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: All yall are sleeping on Portland. I called it a week ago. CJ+Collins+Simons and whatever picks for Harden+Tucker.