+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: 2020-2021 AROUND the NBA: Archived (/showthread.php?tid=622)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - omahen - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 04:23 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Isn't the simplest thing in the world CJ and one year from expiring Nurkic for KP and one year from expiring JRich?
I would say Portland would also be looking to save some money and CJ is arguably a better player than KP and Nurkic is better than JRich. So I would say KP+Brunson for CJ and Nurkic.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Hypermav - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 04:32 PM)omahen Wrote: I would say Portland would also be looking to save some money and CJ is arguably a better player than KP and Nurkic is better than JRich. So I would say KP+Brunson for CJ and Nurkic.
Need a little more salary like Melli. At least that is what the trade machine says. Portland is -14 wins though with that trade...
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - omahen - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 04:38 PM)Hypermav Wrote: Need a little more salary like Melli. At least that is what the trade machine says. Portland is -14 wins though with that trade...
We have cap space
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - burekemde - 06-26-2021
How good is CJ McCollum?
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Kammrath - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:02 PM)burekemde Wrote: How good is CJ McCollum?
Good enough to easily be the best teammate Luka has ever had in the NBA.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - audiosway - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:06 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Good enough to easily be the best teammate Luka has ever had in the NBA.
I disagree. He is an undersized 2 guard that has heavily benefitted from playing with Dame. He is too small and a liability on defense.
KP is better. Not healthier but better.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Jommybone - 06-26-2021
Yeah, hard to say with confidence because there are so many what ifs with KP. But I lean towards believing he’s better than the other big-contract, for-sale guys:
1. Love
2. Wall
3. Kemba
4. Westbrook
5. CJ
In that order, I think.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - KillerLeft - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:25 PM)Jommybone Wrote: 1. Love
2. Wall
3. Kemba
4. Westbrook
5. CJ
In that order, I think.
What order? Is this worst to best (I hope)?
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Jommybone - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:26 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: What order? Is this worst to best (I hope)?
That’s not obvious? Yes. I think I’d put KP next.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Kammrath - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:20 PM)audiosway Wrote: I disagree. He is an undersized 2 guard that has heavily benefitted from playing with Dame. He is too small and a liability on defense.
KP is better. Not healthier but better.
He is 6'3.25" with a 6'6.25" wingspan.
His on/off the last three seasons:
20-21: +4.8 O, +2.8 D
19-20: +7.3 O, -2.2 D
18-19: +7.3 O, -0.7 D
Luka is an oversized PG, so having an undersized SG works with Luka.
McCollum is a decent defender by the numbers (not horrible) and a consistently big impact on the offensive side of things.
I would take McCollum over KP because I know the fit with KP and Luka is garbage.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - KillerLeft - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:31 PM)Jommybone Wrote: That’s not obvious? Yes. I think I’d put KP next.
Well...you confused me by putting your pick for worst #1 and your pick for best at the bottom...maybe I'm dumb, but I feel like most people would've done the opposite? Sorry to ask a dumb question!
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Jommybone - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:31 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Luka is an oversized PG, so having an undersized SG works with Luka.
Can’t agree with this. Luka needs a backcourt mate who can defend waterbug PGs. I thought the days of DFS having to cover the point, rather than the best wing, were behind us. This is why Richardson seemed like such a great acquisition 11 months ago. (Oops on that one.)
(06-26-2021, 05:34 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Well...you confused me by putting your pick for worst #1 and your pick for best at the bottom...maybe I'm dumb, but I feel like most people would've done the opposite? Sorry to ask a dumb question!
No, no! Not dumb! Sorry my reply sounded derisive. Just thought, yikes, you don’t really think I’d be advocating for Love, do you? (Of course, you don’t know me. And I’ve probably posted stupider things. So sure, makes sense.)
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - HoosierDaddyKid - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 03:58 PM)Dova Wrote: I wonder if Portland wants a 7'3" unicorn for CJ or Dame
He's 7'3 but he lost his unicorn status. He has to re-apply under Kidd.
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCullom "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Dova - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 05:42 PM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: He's 7'3 but he lost his unicorn status. He has to re-apply under Kidd.
Unicorns dont exist and neither does twig so i think it applies
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCollum "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Kammrath - 06-26-2021
https://twitter.com/mcten/status/1408911610760945665
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCollum "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Kammrath - 06-26-2021
https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/1408926479061340163
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCollum "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Kammrath - 06-26-2021
https://twitter.com/AmicoHoops/status/1408924215408041984
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCollum "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - KillerLeft - 06-26-2021
(06-26-2021, 06:15 PM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/AmicoHoops/status/1408924215408041984
BE PREPARED
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCollum "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - Hypermav - 06-26-2021
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/5mBE2MiMVFITS/giphy.gif)
RE: AROUND the NBA: CJ McCollum "probable" if not "certain" to be traded - DrMav - 06-26-2021
What?!