![]() |
AROUND the NBA: - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: AROUND the NBA: (/showthread.php?tid=2171) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
|
RE: AROUND the NBA: - Chicagojk - 07-20-2025 (07-19-2025, 07:10 PM)Smitty Wrote: I have a sneaky suspicion that Martin WILL start the season in the Mavs 10-man rotation. Really, Kidd plays 11-man rotations in the regular season. Still, when everyone is healthy, I see B-Will being the odd man out. I like him, but DLO and Exum are better and Flagg will play some point-forward also. In those instances, B-Will doesn’t provide the same off-ball advantages that DLO and Exum do.I have similar thoughts. You mention, if everyone is healthy. That is key. When they are, someone is going to be left out. Someone probably deserving who should be playing. Kidd is going to have his work cut out for him. I will be disappointed if Christie is the one who is left out. I liked what I saw last year. He still needs plenty of work and I am not sure what he is yet. I do think potentially he could be a really good high minute bench player. There are things he definately needs to improve on though. He just feels like a smart player though. RE: AROUND the NBA: - mvossman - 07-20-2025 (07-19-2025, 08:12 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Despite fairly good numbers at times, no one seems to want to pay Grimes and the assets it takes to get him when he's traded are less than impressive. At the time it all happened, it made sense to move from Green to Grimes and from THJ to Klay. Green finally got to start and saw his usage actually go down on a bad team. And, as mentioned, THJ was a rental and is now a Vet Min. But, Klay and Martin don't seem to be the answer either...especially at guard. Because of his status around the league, you can't just ship Thompson off to some cellar dweller. Meanwhile, Martin looks like someone who is going to really be costly from a tax standpoint if he's indeed the 12th man or so on the depth chart. The problem is they never replaced DJJ. They really need that high level point of attack defender (which they still don't have). If Grimes had been able to play that role it would have made a lot of sense, but he is a lot more like Klay than DJJ. They would have been better off paying DJJ his 10 mil to start and sign Grimes (instead of a 10 year older Klay) to the MLE as THJ replacement. Then Grimes gets plenty of minutes because he is not competing with Klay for the same role. I'm not sure what the deal is with Grimes. There is enough evidence to have concerns that he might have coachability issues, but there are also reasonable alternative explanations for that evidence. I'm going to be very curious how it plays out in Philly. RE: AROUND the NBA: - HoosierDaddyKid - 07-22-2025 https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45790173/all-30-nba-teams-roster-mistakes-2020 All 30 teams roster mistakes since 2020 RE: AROUND the NBA: - ballsrchr - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 06:59 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45790173/all-30-nba-teams-roster-mistakes-2020 I especially like #1... It was pretty spot on. RE: AROUND the NBA: - HoosierDaddyKid - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 07:53 AM)ballsrchr Wrote: I especially like #1... Regardless of how the future plays out between both teams, this has to be top five for the worst trade ever, no matter what sport. RE: AROUND the NBA: - numnuts23 - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 02:12 PM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Regardless of how the future plays out between both teams, this has to be top five for the worst trade ever, no matter what sport. Yup...it's not just that they traded him (that's bad enough to be one of the worst), it's the focus on 1 sole team who didn't even have to give up the farm to get him. FU Nico RE: AROUND the NBA: - DallasMaverick - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 02:12 PM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Regardless of how the future plays out between both teams, this has to be top five for the worst trade ever, no matter what sport. Hmm… Isn’t the big question about how the future plays out? For example, Luka ruptures an Achilles in November, and never plays again. AD wins 4 championships with the Mavs. Do you still believe it was a bad trade? RE: AROUND the NBA: - Jmaciscool - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 04:08 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Hmm… Yes, it was a bad trade. There aren't any what-ifs or what-abouts that can happen that will change that. To me the above scenario is like saying "if you bet your life savings on one roll of the dice in Vegas and win a ton of money then doesn't that make it a good decision?" It's still a bad decision even if an unlikely positive outcome is the result. RE: AROUND the NBA: - Mavs2021 - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 04:08 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Hmm… I wanted to write: We should ban the first person that will defend-troll Nico´s top spot and we all know which clown that it will be. You did not disappoint. RE: AROUND the NBA: - Winter - 07-22-2025 I was listening to Jason Timpf's podcast about the Lakers moves this off-season. Essentially, he said this could go pretty bad given the history. The Lakers are relying on the health and professionalism of LeBron who's over 40, Doncic who is frequently out of shape, Ayton who has real maturity issues, and Smart who had had trouble playing half a season for the last six years. Even LaRiva has had trouble staying healthy in his short career. The Lakers are relying on perfect health to be competitve in the playoffs. And of course, none of the players mentioned have played a full season together. RE: AROUND the NBA: - DallasMaverick - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 04:53 PM)Jmaciscool Wrote: Yes, it was a bad trade. There aren't any what-ifs or what-abouts that can happen that will change that. I guess I’m stuck. Aren’t results the only real measure of a value-based decision? Back in 1990, I kept my Novell stock and sold my Microsoft stock. In retrospect, it was a really bad trade - because of the results. I suppose that, if you’re using some other measure than team success, you could render an absolute and immediate judgment. So, let me try to state your position: “The Luka trade was a bad trade because I don’t like it.” I certainly can’t argue with that! RE: AROUND the NBA: - DallasMaverick - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 08:06 PM)Winter Wrote: I was listening to Jason Timpf's podcast about the Lakers moves this off-season. But wait… Aren’t you saying that we need to see results before we render a judgement on the trade? Can’t we just render an opinion and be done with it? RE: AROUND the NBA: - Winter - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 08:14 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: But wait… Yes. Yes, you can. RE: AROUND the NBA: - myconsumerclub - 07-22-2025 Three Questions: What are the odds we have to expose Brandon in order to create roster space for Exum before we give him our 3rd two way contract? Who do you think another team will take interest in from our end of the bench pieces to give us a shot at moving them off for roster space so we do not need to expose Brandon? By what date does such a trade need to take place? RE: AROUND the NBA: - Jmaciscool - 07-22-2025 (07-22-2025, 08:12 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: I guess I’m stuck. Aren’t results the only real measure of a value-based decision? Sorry, I guess I didn't explain my position very well if that's what you got from it. My feeling is that you have to factor in the risks and likely outcomes. So for me it's not "The Luka trade was bad because I didn't like it" but instead "the Luka trade was bad because it traded a younger generational talent for an older generational talent without getting compensated accordingly for the difference in talent and age of the players." That's not even taking into account the lack of shopping for other offers, the fact the Mavs sent back a second round pick, etc. Put another way, and to use a variation of your example, let's say the Mavs traded Gafford for Jokic, and in the first game Jokic gets a career ending injury and never plays another game for the Mavs while Gafford helps Denver win four rings. Would that be a good trade? I would argue the trade itself was still good but had an unfortunate outcome that wasn't likely (but not impossible). Hopefully that helps better explain where I'm coming from. RE: AROUND the NBA: - mvossman - 07-23-2025 (07-22-2025, 08:06 PM)Winter Wrote: I was listening to Jason Timpf's podcast about the Lakers moves this off-season. Sounds like the Mavs. RE: AROUND the NBA: - omahen - 07-23-2025 (07-22-2025, 08:06 PM)Winter Wrote: I was listening to Jason Timpf's podcast about the Lakers moves this off-season. You picked a very pessimistic interpretation of what he said ![]() He said that Lakers have a big variety of possibilities, extremely high variance. Everything goes well, they are a contender. Things don't go well, they can even miss the play-in. Timpf is a bit dissapointed because he thinks Lakers are holding back pick and Knecht, saving them for potential star trade (Giannis or Jokic) next season. I am not so sure that really is their plan. I mean, they already traded those assets in the unsuccessful Williams trade. I think it is totally possible, that a high level starter was never available. You don't use these assets on guys like Thybulle. You need a high(er) level starter. One such player that was traded was Bane and he cost 4 FRP. Perhaps Cam Johnson would be an upgrade (I am not convinced he is a good enough defender for what Lakers need) as he was traded for 1 FRP, but not sure what value BKN saw in MPJ. There was no other high level starter that was traded this summer that Lakers could afford and would make sense on Lakers. For example Collins, Simons - none of them makes much sense for Lakers. Lakers biggest need is an athletic 3-D wing that is at least decent on offense. What player that fits this description would be available? It was reported Miami wanted FRP and Knecht (and Hachimura) for Wiggins and I doubt anyone thinks that would be a good move for Lakers. What kind of wing can you get for a FRP and Knecht? Do the Lakers become surefire contenders if they trade the FRP for Thybulle? I think Lakers would trade for such a guy immediately if the price was lower, but it just seems it is not. Part of the problem is, that there are only three clear tanking teams in Utah, Washington and BKN. None of them has a player that would fit what Lakers need. Everyone else is at least hoping they can compete for play-in at this point. Based on that, they are only willing to do business if they get a very good price in return. My guess is, we will see more opportunities closer to TDL, when some teams will inevitabely see their season sucks and might start selling off some pieces for more future assets. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e69Abx03lzY RE: AROUND the NBA: - Winter - 07-23-2025 Would you consider "extremely high variance" optimistic? ![]() Yes, I agree it's pessimistic. When he says the Lakers will need very good health from all those players, that sounds pessimistic - as it should be. I think the same thing for the Mavericks really. They will need good health to compete in Western Conference. RE: AROUND the NBA: - Chicagojk - 07-23-2025 Mavs at #19 in the athletic rankings post draft and most of free agency. San Antonio at 20 Dallas Mavericks Last ranking: 17 Free agency: PG Kyrie Irving (re-signed), SF Dante Exum (re-signed), C Dwight Powell (exercised option) Additions: SF Cooper Flagg (draft), PG D’Angelo Russell Departures: PG Spencer Dinwiddie Midsummer summary: Dallas has something of a crowded roster and needs to shed a standard contract. But whoever that player might be, No. 1 pick Flagg replaces them. Automatic upgrade! The only other roster change of note is that Russell is here to replace Dinwiddie, which should be another upgrade for the Mavericks, although Russell had a forgettable season that saw him drop below 40 percent from the field for the first time in his career. It will be up to Flagg and Russell to run Dallas’ offense and find Anthony Davis, who is recovering from surgery to repair a detached retina. Elsewhere in the surgery department, center Dereck Lively II had foot surgery this month. While Davis and Lively should be ready for camp, it underscores the lack of availability both players have had. Availability, of course, is a major concern for Kyrie Irving as well, who re-signed about four months after tearing his ACL. There is more than enough size here, but Irving isn’t saving the shaky guard play that this team projects to have. RE: AROUND the NBA: - numnuts23 - 07-23-2025 (07-23-2025, 09:17 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Mavs at #19 in the athletic rankings post draft and most of free agency. Wait, so adding Flagg and Russell - while losing only Dinwiddie drops them in the rankings? Dang, didn't know Spencer was that highly thought of. |