![]() |
Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) (/showthread.php?tid=3770) |
RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - cow - 03-16-2025 (03-16-2025, 06:32 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: Dennis Lindsay would like a word with you. I'll only talk to our past or present GMs. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - khaled1987 - 03-16-2025 (03-16-2025, 07:10 PM)cow Wrote: I'll only talk to our past or present GMs. Rosas? Wasn't he actually the one who had the official title of GM? I think Donnie was president of basketball operations most of the time here, without someone being "GM" , Nico is called both, which is a bit weird. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - mvossman - 03-16-2025 (03-16-2025, 04:56 PM)bubbler86 Wrote: He has had 4-5 seasons where he was above 30%. When I said 30-40 I meant between it, not actual 40. 30-34% is fine. A low volume, low 30s percent shooter is completely useless. The only reason you would have AD out there is to help spread the floor, but nobody is going to guard him when he is that bad (why should they?). If this team ever gets healthy and plays two centers, defenses are going to pack the paint. Its going to be very difficult for perimeter players who thrive on getting into the paint. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - audiosway - 03-17-2025 (03-16-2025, 04:52 PM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Damn, seems like Phoenix doesn't want the 10th spot either. They're stinking it up vs the Lakers minus LeBron, and Rui. Luka is making Jaxson Hayes look like a All Star. Mavs might make the play-in by default. Phoenix is horrible, yet they have limited options to get better..They need to blow it up in the worse way. Matt Ishbia has destroyed that team trying to build a superteam of players that don't mesh. Man I feel terrible for you guys. I really do. As fans we were sold a lie. I've been watching the Luka and he is looking great. He is getting to the rim fine playing solid D and getting back into game shape for the playoffs. I couldn't deal with it once I realized Nico straight up lied. Luka is fine and the trade with Grimes were more of his nonsense. Grimes looks great as well. I've been on board for over 20 years with the Mavs but I couldn't deal with this one. Frustrating that I was backing it at first thinking there must be something wrong with Luka that we weren't seeing. Instead, it was just Nico making stuff up to cover up being an idiot. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - Knutsen - 03-17-2025 Grimes is averaging 26.1 points, 5 rebounds and 4.4 assists along with 2.1 steals in 8 games in March, with excellent percentages. How can you throw such a player away? He‘d be easily able to get these numbers on this depleted Mavs team right now, then you have great asset in the summer to sign and trade or keep while getting rid of someone else. It‘s so sad how we destroyed a team on the brink of winning it all without reason. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - Nowitzki Way - 03-17-2025 (03-17-2025, 04:00 AM)Knutsen Wrote: Grimes is averaging 26.1 points, 5 rebounds and 4.4 assists along with 2.1 steals in 8 games in March, with excellent percentages. How can you throw such a player away? I'd like to know if the reports are true that Grimes asked to be traded after we traded Luka. I can see him saying he would not re-sign here no matter what and Nico getting what he could for him. But why give up the valuable 2nd rounder too? That trade made absolute zero sense. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - cow - 03-17-2025 Trading Grimes is fine if you don't think you can afford him. Sending compensation along with him was silly in the first place and a lot worse now that Kyrie's knee gave out and Day-to-Davis lived up to his nickname. To be charitable, hindsight is 20/20 so it's fair to say the trade was merely silly. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - mvossman - 03-17-2025 (03-17-2025, 09:51 AM)Nowitzki Way Wrote: I'd like to know if the reports are true that Grimes asked to be traded after we traded Luka. The rumor is his agent asked for the trade, but Grimes said he was surprised to be traded. He was a restricted free agent, so Mavs could match any other offer. He could threaten to take the qualifying offer (very unlikely) but there is no hint he wanted out that badly. As in the Luka trade, Occam's Razor says it was simply GM incompetence. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - Chicagojk - 03-17-2025 I have said multiple times that I think it is fair to say some good teams would prefer Martin over Grimes. Grimes was good here. His passing and self creation was a nice surprise. He would have fit in real well when it was just Kyrie and no big guys. I also thought Grimes defense was god. In my limited viewing I think Martin is better there though. His offense is the big swing skill there. Not sure if he is going to be able to shoot well enough for what we need. I don’t think Grimes is an 18 pt a game scorer on a good team. Probably between 10-13. The issue for me was always the second round pick. I guarantee you I will like several guys at pick 36. That pick with a player may have been enough for a guy like Coby white. Now, besides our first round pick, we really don’t have the ammo for trades. I don’t think white is with pick number 10 plus a player. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - DallasMaverick - 03-17-2025 (03-17-2025, 01:24 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: I have said multiple times that I think it is fair to say some good teams would prefer Martin over Grimes. Grimes was good here. His passing and self creation was a nice surprise. He would have fit in real well when it was just Kyrie and no big guys. I also thought Grimes defense was god. In my limited viewing I think Martin is better there though. His offense is the big swing skill there. Not sure if he is going to be able to shoot well enough for what we need. Let’s face it: very, very few second round picks make it in the NBA. Every once in awhile there’s an outlier. More like a lottery ticket than a meal ticket. Don’t overvalue them. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - mvossman - 03-17-2025 (03-17-2025, 02:21 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Let’s face it: very, very few second round picks make it in the NBA. Every once in awhile there’s an outlier. More like a lottery ticket than a meal ticket. Early second round picks have legit value. The quality of player is not that different from late first rounders, and you have more options from a contract perspective. Lets also not forget that Brunson was an early second round pick. Even if you miss on several chances, it only takes one hit to make a big difference, but that can't happen if your GM keeps giving them away like candy. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - DallasMaverick - 03-17-2025 (03-17-2025, 02:55 PM)mvossman Wrote: Early second round picks have legit value. The quality of player is not that different from late first rounders, and you have more options from a contract perspective. Lets also not forget that Brunson was an early second round pick. Even if you miss on several chances, it only takes one hit to make a big difference, but that can't happen if your GM keeps giving them away like candy. Yes, they have some value. https://fansided.com/posts/nba-draft-pick-value#:~:text=Between%201980%20and%202020%2C%20the,came%20in%20at%2022.1%20VORP. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - mvossman - 03-17-2025 (03-17-2025, 03:37 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Yes, they have some value. One issue I have with that analysis is that they are including negative VORP. Most non lottery guys are going to get negative VORP in their first couple of seasons (usually in garbage time). That negative VORP will blunt the actual value when hit on the pick. That being said, notice there is a much bigger drop from 1-18 to 19-30 than there is from 19-30 to 31-48 (and it would be even less so if they ignored negative VORP). The narrative has always been that first round picks are valuable assets and 2nd round picks are throw away. What this suggests is that not all firsts are the same, and not all seconds either. I would rather have two early 2nd round picks than one late round first. RE: Game 69: Dallas Mavericks (33-35) vs. Philadelphia 76ers (22-44) - Chicagojk - 03-18-2025 (03-17-2025, 01:06 PM)mvossman Wrote: The rumor is his agent asked for the trade, but Grimes said he was surprised to be traded. He was a restricted free agent, so Mavs could match any other offer. He could threaten to take the qualifying offer (very unlikely) but there is no hint he wanted out that badly. As in the Luka trade, Occam's Razor says it was simply GM incompetence. I haven't listened to DLLS podcast from today but supposedly Stein says there was no Grimes trade request. Nico just liked Martin. BTW, I have seen a few of the games but the DLLS and Locked on Mavs podcasts have really helped me. Whether I am a fan moving forward is TBD, but they are doing really nice work. I have not been able to listen to any of the regular NBA podcasts that I enjoy. I have been instead listening to a lot of news podcasts....and that is going just great ![]() |