![]() |
Trade & FA 2025-26: Free Agency Starts 5pm CST/6pm EST - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Trade & FA 2025-26: Free Agency Starts 5pm CST/6pm EST (/showthread.php?tid=3856) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
|
RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - cow - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 12:23 PM)michaeltex Wrote: Obviously, the team is thin at PG, but re-signing a healthy Exum and seeing if BWill can continue developing while waiting on Kyrie's return might be enough. Agree with all you said, but this will almost certainly not be enough. It's also why the pet cat idea of Ball is bothersome, as even with him in the mix, that's probably not enough. I loved Ball before his nightmare injury, but he seems a lot more like a luxury experiment rather than someone you'd need to depend on. And even if Exum/Ball could stay healthy and with BWill, I'm not sure they'd keep you competitive and, foolish or not, the organization is going to want to be competitive as Nico is certainly on the hot seat. It's a tricky situation given our cap/asset situation. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - DallasMaverick - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 12:39 PM)cow Wrote: Agree with all you said, but this will almost certainly not be enough. It's also why the pet cat idea of Ball is bothersome, as even with him in the mix, that's probably not enough. I loved Ball before his nightmare injury, but he seems a lot more like a luxury experiment rather than someone you'd need to depend on. And even if Exum/Ball could stay healthy and with BWill, I'm not sure they'd keep you competitive and, foolish or not, the organization is going to want to be competitive as Nico is certainly on the hot seat. It's a tricky situation given our cap/asset situation. Every scenario involves risk of injury. There is NO scenario in which you can say with 100% certainty "We've got that covered." We're dealing with uncertainty at every moment. Who could have foreseen that the Mavs would be playing a substantial number of games with no bigs available last year? Really? What are the odds? Because it happened once, do you feel compelled to mitigate against it now? So, maybe the Mavs should be trying to trade for another center right now, just so they can be "certain" that it won't be a problem. Sometimes injuries happen. Sometimes you lose as a result. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - michaeltex - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 12:39 PM)cow Wrote: Agree with all you said, but this will almost certainly not be enough. It's also why the pet cat idea of Ball is bothersome, as even with him in the mix, that's probably not enough. I loved Ball before his nightmare injury, but he seems a lot more like a luxury experiment rather than someone you'd need to depend on. And even if Exum/Ball could stay healthy and with BWill, I'm not sure they'd keep you competitive and, foolish or not, the organization is going to want to be competitive as Nico is certainly on the hot seat. It's a tricky situation given our cap/asset situation. I know this sounds dense, but which Ball are we talking about? Lonzo or LaMelo? Lonzo Averages - 48 gms, 11.4/5.5/5.8 shooting .398/.362/.599 (7 seasons) LaMelo Averages - 47 gms, 21.0/6.0/7.4 shooting .421/.365/.837 (5 seasons) In my mind it's LaMelo, but I remember CHI giving Lonzo a 2yr contract to help make him more "tradeable". TBH, nothing really inspirational about either. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - cow - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 01:20 PM)michaeltex Wrote: I know this sounds dense, but which Ball are we talking about? Lonzo or LaMelo? Lonzo is the name being floated around as an inexpensive trade target. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - michaeltex - 06-03-2025 I know the NBA writers don't have a lot to write about right now. Everything is pretty much on hold until after the championship series and you can only preview the draft so many times. So they have fallen to dreaming up trade scenarios to keep the clicks coming. Mostly I ignore these except for the amusement of "what were they smoking when coming up with this?" One that is kind of annoying (in that it shows the depths of idiocy some will bend to) because it has popped up a few places is DAL's 2025 #1 to PHX for Booker, 2025 #29 and least favorable pick swaps in 2028 (NYK/WAS) and 2029 (CLE/MIN/UTA). I mean you would expect a writer covering the league to have some concept of real value of the components of a trade. Booker is a hell of a talent, but (given the history) why would anyone expect him to happily settle in DAL and play productively? Anybody sense I don't have much patience with most beat writers? RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - FireNicoHarrison - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 12:49 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Every scenario involves risk of injury. Trade Luka Doncic for street clothes is a perfect example that sometimes you are searching a lot of injuries... RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Winter - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 01:55 PM)michaeltex Wrote: I know the NBA writers don't have a lot to write about right now. Everything is pretty much on hold until after the championship series and you can only preview the draft so many times. So they have fallen to dreaming up trade scenarios to keep the clicks coming. Mostly I ignore these except for the amusement of "what were they smoking when coming up with this?" Someone else posted this - maybe Knutsen - that this particular draft\trade article is a standard, cookie-cutter article that comes out at this time every year. You just switch around a draft pick and some trade fodder, and plug it into an article generator. It's ESPN filler. It's like a merangue topping. Most of it is just air. No one actually believes it, but apparently those articles are popular - just like they are on a message board. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Chicagojk - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 12:23 PM)michaeltex Wrote: I agree. There is something to be said for drafting Flagg and then seeing what can be done farther down the bench with Powell/Hardy/Martin. Wouldn't mind making a spot to see if Jones can continue to contribute. Obviously, the team is thin at PG, but re-signing a healthy Exum and seeing if BWill can continue developing while waiting on Kyrie's return might be enough. I know the Mavs think this team is ready to win now. I am less doubtful they can return to a contender next year. There just seems to be too many unknowns and moving parts. Therefore, if things go right this year, I think the following year is when they could be a contender. That is why I am a little uneasy making a big move now. Who knows what this thing looks like when we see them on the court. Maybe the needs change. If you see a clear upgrade, make the move. Although don't be pressured to make a move. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Chicagojk - 06-03-2025 I have been thinking how this Mavs team can become a contender again. I think the league is really deep right now (espcially in the West). The current Mavs team also have some weird fitting parts and finding a perfect fit will be challenging. I have also had trouble finding a prototype they can compare to. Today I was thinking what about the 2009 and 2010 Lakers. Obviously the Mavs don't have Kobe and it is tough to win without a top 7-8 player in the league. Could Kyrie give you 75-80 percent of what Kobe did? If you look at the rest of the Lakers roster, they were a big physical team. One without a real point guard either. Derek Fisher started at point. He was a smaller guard but was strong and physical. Gasol played PF. could AD match that production? Bynum was the starter. Ron Artest for one of those championships was a starter. I believe Trevor Ariza was on the other championship. They got bigger with Lamar Odom as the 6th man. I just wonder if that will be the prototype Nico looks to mimic. They don't have a Kobe but you could argue they have a deeper team than that Laker team. The NBA has changed since this championship and maybe playing without elite floor spacing is a losing battle, but just got me thinking. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Winter - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 07:05 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: The Mavericks, in my opinion, are need of some players who can put the ball on the floor. Speaking of floor spacing, while watching the Pacers, it appeared to me every player was 2-3 feet farther away from the paint than I was used to seeing. I couldn't tell if I imagining it or not. If it was intentional, Carlisle has created a different look for his offense.... one that is trying to take advantage of good perimeter shooters. I never heard any comment about this, but I didn't have the volume turned up. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - FireNicoHarrison - 06-03-2025 (06-03-2025, 04:58 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: I know the Mavs think this team is ready to win now. I am less doubtful they can return to a contender next year. There just seems to be too many unknowns and moving parts. Therefore, if things go right this year, I think the following year is when they could be a contender. That is why I am a little uneasy making a big move now. Who knows what this thing looks like when we see them on the court. Maybe the needs change. If you see a clear upgrade, make the move. Although don't be pressured to make a move. The question is different, can Harrison survive to another mediocre/bad Mavs season? I don't think so. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - F Gump - 06-04-2025 (06-03-2025, 11:27 PM)FireNicoHarrison Wrote: The question is different, can Harrison survive to another mediocre/bad Mavs season? I don't think so. Sorry, but to me the question is never about Nico. I don't really care about NTI. He is who he is (an idiot in a job that needs a genius). He needs to be fired. Nothing changes that. And whatever happens (in spite of him here), I'm not interested in factoring in how that impacts him still being here. I hope the Mavs are already looking for his replacement, or maybe even having talks to find a true expert for the job. He should have been fired a month ago, and tomorrow isn't soon enough (but it's better than two days from now). He's gotta go period. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - david75090 - 06-04-2025 (06-04-2025, 12:01 AM)F Gump Wrote: Sorry, but to me the question is never about Nico. I don't really care about NTI. He is who he is (an idiot in a job that needs a genius). He needs to be fired. Nothing changes that. And whatever happens (in spite of him here), I'm not interested in factoring in how that impacts him still being here. I'm having trouble with the discussions of this Mavs move and that Mavs move, because I don't want Nico making any of 'em. The first move is to fire Nico. There can be no other move until that happens. Myself, I don't want Nico doing anything else to the team. He's done enough. I cringe at the thought of what else he might do. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Winter - 06-04-2025 (06-04-2025, 06:22 AM)david75090 Wrote: I'm having trouble with the discussions of this Mavs move and that Mavs move, because I don't want Nico making any of 'em. The first move is to fire Nico. There can be no other move until that happens. Myself, I don't want Nico doing anything else to the team. He's done enough. I cringe at the thought of what else he might do. The question for me, which hasn't been answered, is what will he be allowed to do? If he isn't fired, then it's very hard to believe that everything is just as it was a few months ago. His every move should be scrutinized during this off-season. The owners have a huge investment in Dallas. Huge. I have hard time believing they just allow him to trade and draft with no oversight. Not now. The only way an investor recovers losses, which I'm guessing were substantial, is to make sure it doesn't repeat itself. They caught a break with Cooper Flagg. But if they're not firing Nico, they better damn well have a lot more oversight. They could still screw this up, but I seriously doubt this a solo operation anymore. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - david75090 - 06-04-2025 Saw something on YouTube. It was a radio station interview with Chuck Cooperstein after The Trade. It wasn't a DFW station but a Mavs network station. Among other things they were talking about Mavs sales people having to call up folks, trying to sell tickets and renewals of tickets and the abuse these innocents were having to take from those that they were talking to on the phone. It was something I hadn't considered. I imagined myself in that position, both ways. As the person trying to make the sale, and the fan they were trying to sell to. Immediately after The Trade, I can't imagine myself being any kind of polite had anyone tried selling me tickets at that point in time. How much better has it gotten, since? Management has to be aware of the issue. It would still be an issue, with me, I'm wondering if it's still an issue fanbase wide. The Trade screwed the pooch with fans. How deep does it go? How long does ownership let this drag out before they do, what I think, is the right thing, and fire Nico? RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - numnuts23 - 06-04-2025 (06-04-2025, 08:39 AM)david75090 Wrote: Saw something on YouTube. It was a radio station interview with Chuck Cooperstein after The Trade. It wasn't a DFW station but a Mavs network station. Among other things they were talking about Mavs sales people having to call up folks, trying to sell tickets and renewals of tickets and the abuse these innocents were having to take from those that they were talking to on the phone. It was something I hadn't considered. I imagined myself in that position, both ways. As the person trying to make the sale, and the fan they were trying to sell to. Immediately after The Trade, I can't imagine myself being any kind of polite had anyone tried selling me tickets at that point in time. How much better has it gotten, since? Management has to be aware of the issue. It would still be an issue, with me, I'm wondering if it's still an issue fanbase wide. The Trade screwed the pooch with fans. How deep does it go? How long does ownership let this drag out before they do, what I think, is the right thing, and fire Nico? Winning the lotto helped quite a bit for many fans. I thought I saw a number some where that in the 3 days after the lotto, their ticket sales went up like $7 million. They just got extremely lucky (or got what they were "owed" for some). It still won't erase the Luka trade immediately. Luka meant so much to this town, not just because he was a generational talent - but because of how he seemed off the court. Was always joking around, making the game fun. He seemed like someone you could go have some beers with and not some larger than life superstar that wouldn't give you the time of day. I have no idea personally if that was true or not, but it's the perception that I always felt. Same for my kids, he was just a grown kid, having fun playing the game of basketball....that could turn into a stone cold killer at the drop of a dime. Was great to watch, but also might end up being the downfall of his career as he gets older. Flagg on the other hand seems like a professional....more like Dirk in a way. He's going to work his butt off trying to be the best player he can. Two different players but given a little time and success, I think the fans will ease right into cheering on another drafted Superstar towards Championship. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Winter - 06-04-2025 There will likely be a day sometime in the future where we can forget Luka as a missing player. There will never be a day, not even one, where Nico will be forgiven for allowing the franchise to get robbed. These two things will eventually separate and become two issues. Cooper Flagg can't fix the second one. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - FireNicoHarrison - 06-04-2025 (06-04-2025, 10:20 AM)Winter Wrote: There will likely be a day sometime in the future where we can forget Luka as a missing player. This. Thank you. RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Ghost of Podkolzin - 06-04-2025 I keep going back to Dyson Daniels; I'd take him over Herbert Jones. Younger, plays better D, and is precisely what we need in a PG. IMO, we overvalue DLive and undervalue AD. This works, and I think gives us a chip. DLive/OMax for Daniels works Daniels, Exum Kyrie, Klay, Christie Flagg, Matin PJ, Naji AD, Gafford RE: Trade & FA 2025-26: - Razzmatazz_Hopskidillydoo - 06-04-2025 (06-04-2025, 05:53 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: I keep going back to Dyson Daniels; I'd take him over Herbert Jones. Younger, plays better D, and is precisely what we need in a PG. I like him too, but there's no way he is a better player than DLive. And he isn't "precisely"what the Mavs need at PG -- can't shoot. Below average 3 ball, abysmal free throw shooting that isn't likely to improve. Good D, but would be subject to a hack-a-shaq and you wouldn't want that in your ball handlers. The Hawks has a tall 6'8" PG who is playing out of position. IMHO, if Vit Krejci gets significant minutes at the 1 in Dallas, his numbers would be better. That's who to trade for on the Hawks. |