07-21-2023, 12:25 AM
(07-20-2023, 11:36 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I wish they could have done more, but not at the expense of that unprotected ‘27.
I do NOT criticize on still having the 2027 pick for use on a draft pick in 2027, or whatever. That's not a litmus test for me, for them to strip all the assets bare, and I actually think it's a poor way to operate. No matter what they do, there will be needs in the future, and there need to be assets on hand too. In fact, as they did this season, they need to both use some assets in one place, and add some new ones in another.
But I DO criticize that, for the 2nd year in a row, they saw a specific need, told us they would be sure to fix it very well, and then (either due to utter incompetence, or an inability to be honest) they simply didn't do it. I find that inexcusable, and don't think that sort of problem-solving management is how you run a successful business. Nor is it the right way to treat your customers.